KVR Audio

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:05 am

DrWashington wrote:
So, all in all, I'd say it's a really competently crafted analog emulation capable of some really solid, impressive sounds. It can definitely be rough on the CPU with the more sophisticated presets, but I also expect that to improve in the coming months. The sound of just a single, raw oscillator though is so rich and satisfying (really!) that I couldn't possibly fault them for it. D16 is known for paying obsessive attention to sound quality, and this thing is probably their masterpiece in that regard so far. It really is up there with the very best at the moment, sonically.

That is what I like to hear...

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:35 am

electro wrote:Lush is a Polyphonic SH-101. Supposed to sound the same.

The blurb seems to say otherwise:

D16 wrote:countless hours have been spent analyzing classic analogue synthesizers

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:12 am

@D16

D16 wrote:massive bases

basses

D16 wrote:imminently tweakable

eminently

That's all the free proof reading you're getting.

-

core · Post by **core** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:15 am

hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:massive bases

basses
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently

That's all the free proof reading your getting.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:19 am

core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent

It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very

Mushy Mushy · Post by **Mushy Mushy** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:20 am

hakey wrote:
core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very

But it is imminently tweakable

Shabdahbriah · Post by **Shabdahbriah** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:22 am

Mushy Mushy wrote:
hakey wrote:
core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very
But it is imminently tweakable

Eminently.

Mushy Mushy · Post by **Mushy Mushy** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:24 am

Shabdahbriah wrote:
Mushy Mushy wrote:
hakey wrote:
core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very
But it is imminently tweakable
Eminently.

Well yes it is imminently eminently tweakable.

Shabdahbriah · Post by **Shabdahbriah** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:25 am

Mushy Mushy wrote:
Shabdahbriah wrote:
Mushy Mushy wrote:
hakey wrote:
core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16 eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very
But it is imminently tweakable
Eminently.
Well yes it is imminently eminently tweakable.

Evidently.

core · Post by **core** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:26 am

oh right, I missed the context

hakey wrote:
core wrote:
hakey wrote:@D16
D16 wrote:imminently tweakable
eminently
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:37 am

you also missed my your/you're substitution

trimph1 · Post by **trimph1** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:38 am

Shabdahbriah wrote:
Mushy Mushy wrote:
Shabdahbriah wrote:
Mushy Mushy wrote:
hakey wrote:
core wrote: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/imminent
It's not a question of spelling - the sense doesn't fit.

imminent = about to happen

eminent = very
But it is imminently tweakable
Eminently.
Well yes it is imminently eminently tweakable.
Evidently.

Is very semantical of you....

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:59 am

Perhaps they meant immediately tweakable?

ENV1 · Post by **ENV1** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:02 pm

Nah, im sure they meant immensely tweakable.

(lol)

Shabdahbriah · Post by **Shabdahbriah** » Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:06 pm

hakey wrote:Perhaps they meant immediately tweakable?

"Eminently" is more (contextually) appropriate.

LuSH-101