FLAC?
-
- KVRAF
- 7672 posts since 9 Nov, 2003 from Netherlands
I was searching earlier an open source audio link earlier today where I downloaded a 53 min piece in flac-format.
I had not heard of it before and found this site:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/
They claim free lossless audio coding, and I noticed the 300+ Mb file became 500+ Mb wav-file after decoding.
My question: How can they claim lossless?
Are they saying those 200 Mb difference are wasted info anyhow?
I had not heard of it before and found this site:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/
They claim free lossless audio coding, and I noticed the 300+ Mb file became 500+ Mb wav-file after decoding.
My question: How can they claim lossless?
Are they saying those 200 Mb difference are wasted info anyhow?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7672 posts since 9 Nov, 2003 from Netherlands
Perhaps I could read deeper into it, but I guess perhaps someone here has a bit more indepth knowledge.
I think if this is as flawless as they claim I could free up quite some room on my HD seeing my last song taking up close to half a Gig allready.
I think if this is as flawless as they claim I could free up quite some room on my HD seeing my last song taking up close to half a Gig allready.
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
yes its lossless - its a compression format
you would lose 200 MB using zip or rar too !
the difference is flac (and shorten and ape) can all be read compressed into winamp - so yep youll save yourself some space too !
you would lose 200 MB using zip or rar too !
the difference is flac (and shorten and ape) can all be read compressed into winamp - so yep youll save yourself some space too !
-
- KVRist
- 65 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Deep South, Finland
it's 1:1 with the original. i just spent the weekend flaccing my old backup cds (audio&wav) to flac, saved a lot of space without losing quality. if it wasn't lossless, they shouldn't call it FLAC, anywayMystahr wrote:I think if this is as flawless as they claim I could free up quite some room on my HD seeing my last song taking up close to half a Gig allready.
http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html might not clear things up too much but its worth a read if you're into tech specs n details...
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7672 posts since 9 Nov, 2003 from Netherlands
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7672 posts since 9 Nov, 2003 from Netherlands
Well that toot-willy wrote:nah, its to let others go through the hassle....Mystahr wrote:Thanks you both...
I guess the best way to find out is try*jj
lates
t-willy
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
There are a number of lossless compression tools available that achieve similar compression ratios with no loss in sound quality. Of those, Monkey's Audio and Shorten are probably the most popular. Generally lossless compression gives 2:1 compression at best, less for very noisy material, better for quieter stuff (classical, for instance).Mystahr wrote:I was searching earlier an open source audio link earlier today where I downloaded a 53 min piece in flac-format.
I had not heard of it before and found this site:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/
They claim free lossless audio coding, and I noticed the 300+ Mb file became 500+ Mb wav-file after decoding.
My question: How can they claim lossless?
Are they saying those 200 Mb difference are wasted info anyhow?
Flac is excellent. Fast, free, well supported (except on Macs, but what is?), good developer community. Give it a try!
If you're interested in this subject you can find it discussed in exhaustive detail at http://www.hydrogenaudio.org.
