Windows 8: update or not
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
some months ago i saw that win 8 is much more customisable than win 7,you can change the look a lot.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
In what way? I've been using a Win8 VM for over a year and exclusive on my laptop since the RTM. It seems neither more nor less customizable than 7 to me. The metro part is new and I guess you could say that allows for "extra" customization ... That would really be staring at the lipstick on the pig.t3toooo wrote:some months ago i saw that win 8 is much more customisable than win 7,you can change the look a lot.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
Yeah, good point. It's just that the blog author's comment about data corruption being extremely rare is nonsense. I've experienced it plenty. My current process of platform migration has revealed hard drive data corruption several times in files I don't access frequently. A couple years back I lost a good photo to file corruption. The TIFF has proven impossible to repair with all those BS image file repair utilities too. And I keep backups. Backups are worthless if you don't have endless money to throw at media and if you're backing up corrupted data.bmrzycki wrote:Jace-BeOS wrote:New file system with data corruption avoidance features ... in Server only.(original article)Surendra Verma wrote: we will implement ReFS in a staged evolution of the feature: first as a storage system for Windows Server, then as storage for clients, and then ultimately as a boot volume. This is the same approach we have used with new file systems in the past.
It's how they rolled out NTFS and I agree with the approach. Corruption at the filesystem level can be particularly insidious. Give it time to mature. Heck, Linux has been working on ext4 since 2006 and they just discovered a corruption bug in the stable branches of 3.4,3.5,3.6.
I'd be a lot more concerned if MS decided to add their new filesystem ReFS 1.0 to Win 8 as the default choice.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
SJ_Digriz wrote:In what way? I've been using a Win8 VM for over a year and exclusive on my laptop since the RTM. It seems neither more nor less customizable than 7 to me. The metro part is new and I guess you could say that allows for "extra" customization ... That would really be staring at the lipstick on the pig.t3toooo wrote:some months ago i saw that win 8 is much more customisable than win 7,you can change the look a lot.
aaahw,people are struggling,i know.
-
- KVRian
- 589 posts since 16 Jun, 2003
I wasn't going to do it, but I couldn't resist and now I've updated my DAW too.
So far the only problem that I've encountered is that all of my SonicCharge plugins (Microtonic 3, Synplant, Bitspeek and Permut8) needed to be re-registered.
Running Cubase 6.5 in 32bit mode, tracks from my album have played back with pretty much the same CPU usage as they did on Windows 7.
Plugins that I've briefly tested so far, and in no particular order:
Albino 3
Nexus
Omnisphere
Stylus RMX
Massive
ARP 2600V
Maschine Mikro
Korg Legacy Cell
Absynth 5
Rapture
ElektraX
Sylenth
plus the 4 SonicCharge plugins mentioned above.
I've only very briefly tested them, but so far there are no performance issues.
My audio interface is an M-Audio ProjectMix I/O running over Firewire. This is running on an i5 based system with 7Gb of memory and a single 1900*1080 monitor. To anyone concerned about the Start screen, once I had launched Cubase, I had no reason to switch back to it and it was just like running on Windows 7, or even XP.
Like the AMD Athlon X2 system I upgraded previously, Windows 8 seems a bit nippier than 7.
So far the only problem that I've encountered is that all of my SonicCharge plugins (Microtonic 3, Synplant, Bitspeek and Permut8) needed to be re-registered.
Running Cubase 6.5 in 32bit mode, tracks from my album have played back with pretty much the same CPU usage as they did on Windows 7.
Plugins that I've briefly tested so far, and in no particular order:
Albino 3
Nexus
Omnisphere
Stylus RMX
Massive
ARP 2600V
Maschine Mikro
Korg Legacy Cell
Absynth 5
Rapture
ElektraX
Sylenth
plus the 4 SonicCharge plugins mentioned above.
I've only very briefly tested them, but so far there are no performance issues.
My audio interface is an M-Audio ProjectMix I/O running over Firewire. This is running on an i5 based system with 7Gb of memory and a single 1900*1080 monitor. To anyone concerned about the Start screen, once I had launched Cubase, I had no reason to switch back to it and it was just like running on Windows 7, or even XP.
Like the AMD Athlon X2 system I upgraded previously, Windows 8 seems a bit nippier than 7.
LooneyJetman - Follow me on Spotify | Bandcamp
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
You can do all that in W7t3toooo wrote:SJ_Digriz wrote:In what way? I've been using a Win8 VM for over a year and exclusive on my laptop since the RTM. It seems neither more nor less customizable than 7 to me. The metro part is new and I guess you could say that allows for "extra" customization ... That would really be staring at the lipstick on the pig.t3toooo wrote:some months ago i saw that win 8 is much more customisable than win 7,you can change the look a lot.
aaahw,people are struggling,i know.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
and FWIW you could do that stuff on XP and Win95 too. I used a highly customized version of this desktop about 12 years ago or so...


If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRian
- 1321 posts since 26 Mar, 2004 from UK
I know it's only a small thing, but you can set custom images for your lock screen easily in Windows 8. In windows 7 you had to use a registry hack / group policy setting, and name a custom image specifically in a specific folder.
On the flip side, it seems a glaring omission that OOTB you can't change the start screen background to something bespoke.
my2c.
On the flip side, it seems a glaring omission that OOTB you can't change the start screen background to something bespoke.
my2c.
ABLETON LIVE 12 & PUSH3
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
SJ_Digriz wrote:and FWIW you could do that stuff on XP and Win95 too. I used a highly customized version of this desktop about 12 years ago or so...
well that improved that you're not insane but really challenged.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
I challenge YOU to do that on XP with the tools of the dayt3toooo wrote: well that improved that you're not insane but really challenged.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 7903 posts since 24 May, 2009 from Nationalism isn't my thing...
Do you have a link to that one?SJ_Digriz wrote:and FWIW you could do that stuff on XP and Win95 too. I used a highly customized version of this desktop about 12 years ago or so...
Blue Phase Music
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
i still try to figure out how to get this look but with aero enabled!
i might upgrade to win 8 then.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
It's on Win Customize. I haven't used Rainmeter or Desktop X in a LONG time though. Not sure if all the plugs, icons, graphics, macros and scripts are still hosted anywhere.
Since we are so far OT, I'd just add that the mod community from XP, which included companies like Stardock, really led to a lot of the task bar functionality you see in W7 and W8. Launch lists, app favorites, app groups, etc... I vastly prefer the task bar concept to the Launch Pad concept. But, that is like arguing white spaces and tabs (tabs people are idiots though )
Since we are so far OT, I'd just add that the mod community from XP, which included companies like Stardock, really led to a lot of the task bar functionality you see in W7 and W8. Launch lists, app favorites, app groups, etc... I vastly prefer the task bar concept to the Launch Pad concept. But, that is like arguing white spaces and tabs (tabs people are idiots though )
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
hehehe, that's what everyone around me was using while I had the one I linked. Some of the new desktops are F'n artistically amazing, but functionally they are useless. Unless, all you do is e-mail, stream mp3s and watch youtube.t3toooo wrote:![]()
i still try to figure out how to get this look but with aero enabled!
i might upgrade to win 8 then.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
yes,i love shortcuts on the taskbar but the desktop itself is just boring empty black.
for me it will stay like this,psychological it is so much more balancing.
for me it will stay like this,psychological it is so much more balancing.