iZotope Iris

[TwoToneshuzz]

OK, basic question:

How does one interpret a sonogram? Maybe a video explaining that to potential users might be helpful.

Left to right = time
Top to bottom = frequency (highest at top)
Light to dark = volume (bright = loud, dark = quiet)

HTH

It does!

Ok: As a user, I like to have as much control over the individual elements that constitute a 'patch' as possible- thus: the minimoog reference-it's as straight-forward a interface as they come. So the $64,000 question for any synth-hardware or software-is do I have direct control in an intuitive way over the elements that fit together to make a sound?



The sonogram looks like fft-is it an additive in disquise (I'm asking this respectfully; this is not a slight)

BTW: If Jeremy is reading: hi! I was one of the original Ozone beta testers BITD!

if you only use one voice or track then it's not additive, it's subtractive but extremely easy to be selective so it can also function as a type in situ granular that is the small snippets of sound don't get moved around in time in relation to it's immeadeate surroundings. For examples you could easily isolate just the metallic percussion in a synphonic exerpt.. then bring up the bass drum frequencies without the attack to create a weird but interesting yet connected soundscape.

The glue to make things gel is the Sub bas and some pretty high quality effects that can be used as master effects or sends effects.


Global filter and a macro control with 8 pots add realtime tweakabilty..

Pretty well fleashed out for making things gel together. You could add a compressore at the output. Though there is a loadness control at the master out.

I think the key with Iris is bringing in sounds that are already fairly complementry in some way. Though this is just speculation at this point.

Also just because there are three tracks plus sub it doesn't mean you need to use three diffrent sound files you can use the same file three times and treat it differently like staggered loop points different effects, and of course different painted patterns.

Carefully used there's no doubt that you can make your sound gel..

[goldenanalog]

[TwoToneshuzz]

Deleted.

All gone? What to do.

Hope you have a good evening then..

[aMUSEd]

Anyone got the Voice bank? I liked the idea of it but the demo's are not very good, but maybe it's just not the best patches?

So far Simon's are by far the best patches for it - Simon you should do some vocal patches, please

Sure, so much still to explore, but actually I already did several vocal patches, just check your subscription folder and you'll find some.

I know but I would love for you to do a vocal themed bank for Alchemy or Iris (or both)

[goldenanalog]

[Caine123]

this is protected by iLok? if so im out. crap protection system.

[Shabdahbriah]

this is protected by iLok? if so im out. crap protection system.

"iLok ~ the cure for GAS"

[werp]

this is protected by iLok? if so im out. crap protection system.

"iLok ~ the cure for GAS"

Nope, I purchased an Iris +5 serial number a couple of days a go and registered it by serial number. No iLok required.

[goldenanalog]

[Caine123]

is there a mode or option in iris to let 2 samples played simultaneously but synced?

[werp]

is there a mode or option in iris to let 2 samples played simultaneously but synced?

yes, three separate samples plus a 'sub' as the 4th sample.
can adjust the mix on the mix page..

[goldenanalog]

[goldenanalog]

[Sampleconstruct]

Anyone got the Voice bank? I liked the idea of it but the demo's are not very good, but maybe it's just not the best patches?

So far Simon's are by far the best patches for it - Simon you should do some vocal patches, please

Sure, so much still to explore, but actually I already did several vocal patches, just check your subscription folder and you'll find some.

I know but I would love for you to do a vocal themed bank for Alchemy or Iris (or both)

I see, well my todo list is getting longer every day

[whyterabbyt]

It's the general spirit of the debate about the so called Slow development (lie)

There have only been two new versions of Ozone in 8 years, Trash is just about to go to its second version after 9 years, A couple of thir ten-year-old products are still on V1.

And Ive been using all of them, and most of their other software, for all of that time with not a single complaint, ever, about that timescale. Its not a lie that they're slow, its not even a complaint. Its just an observation, easily substantiated.

and the crippled feature set (lie) that has soured this thread.

more straw man shite.

I cant help but see red when you bring this up once again nth time in just this thread and on the heels of some positive input.

what a crass, petty and downright stupid interpretation of my statement.

'On the heels of positive input?' I bought Iris the day it came out, and I bought the Voice and Toys pack about fifteen minutes before I posted, and what I posted was because I was looking forward to using that, and the future of the tool, despite your bullshit bizarro-world reading of it.

If anything has soured this thread its your bullshit.

My post was my positive input before you tried to twist it in an attempt to play on your high horse. You're the one revelling in the negative.

The issue you bring up is nothing new your imput didn't add anything we didn't already know.

what 'issue'? it was entirely opinion. and the opinion was 'this has so much scope im looking forward to seeing more of it, hopefully soon'.

how the f**k can you get to what you're claiming I said from there I have no f**king idea, but you're a million miles off the mark.

And even though Ive told you you're million miles off the mark, and you have everything backwards, you're still trying to characterise what I said according to your completely innacurate misreading of it.

you got it entirely wrong, and you've already been told that, but you're still going instead of apologising. ttrying to 'look good' are you?

Therefore it classifies as a type of trolling or more rightly flaming, even if it's your first post about this issue then think about how the timing and the repetition of the negative(falsehood), such a selfish act really, that is repugnent and againt the spirit of the forum rules..

Wow. You need some f**king medication.

I would again urge you to contact iZotope directly with your concerns

What 'concerns' would those be? Did I express some concerns? Well, actually, no. You took my positive opinion about the future of something, and turned this thread into a negativity fest, seemingly to bolster your own ego.

And you're still going, despite being told you got it entirely wrong.

Here it's just making yourself look good, showing the forum that you know it all. Your glory here is at the expense of the quiet guy who does the actual work and takes the risks..

You need help. Seriously. That's your response to someone who's excited about Iris and its potential? Projection, every f**king word.

You know what, you've actually been the most negative poster in this entire thread. Maybe you should come back when you've got something positive to say, and you're not so determined to try and pretend you're on the moral highground when you've been explicitly told that what you're reacting to means the exact opposite of what you're claiming.