This is INCREDIBLE !

Keb' Mo' All albums good, but these three is fantastic sound !
Suitcase

Peace...Back By Popular Demand

The Door





I actually answered this with a thought I had in mind a few days back, and it was essentially the second part of what you said - I don't think that the past decade or two has had much to offer in the way of production values. As you said, it's all about "a sound".herodotus wrote:I agree, with a caveat. The problem is that you are right, 'best' is indeed subjective.
Not all evaluations of recordings have to be that subjective, though. The idea of 'fidelity' is nowhere near as subjective as 'best'. And there are definitely some recordings that have better fidelity than others.
But fidelity is almost gone as a standard in recording (except for orchestral recordings). Most people are going after a 'sound' that is highly artificial, so there is no standard to judge this sound against like there always was in the days if high fidelity (e.g. 'Is it live or is it Memorex?). This is all well and good, but people still want a simple standard even though there really isn't one.
I don't know. I'm sure Waves must make a one knob turd polisher by now.The Telenator wrote:We've seen that all these new methods and potential advantages do not necessarily guarantee better music, neither will it 'save' one's music -- still hard to 'polish turds'.
Wow! I've got that Philip Bailey album - It's really good! (Didn't expect to see it on this forumolepro wrote:Philip Bailey: Soul On Jazz
This is INCREDIBLE !
Keb' Mo' All albums good, but these three is fantastic sound !
Suitcase
Peace...Back By Popular Demand
The Door
I have it too, and you're absolutely right; This type of music doesn't seem to catch much attention on KVR. I usually use specialist forum when discussing soul/jazz/funk music. As for the sound, I never really noticed - and my Hi-Fi setup is rather good even.dune_rave wrote:Wow! I've got that Philip Bailey album - It's really good! (Didn't expect to see it on this forum
Stuff like "Higher and Higher" by Jackie Wilson and "Sugar Pie Honey Bunch" sound amazing to this day despite the fact that they were usually recorded on a 2-track and released in glorious mono (versions you hear these days have been stereo-ized.robojam wrote:I actually answered this with a thought I had in mind a few days back, and it was essentially the second part of what you said - I don't think that the past decade or two has had much to offer in the way of production values. As you said, it's all about "a sound".herodotus wrote:I agree, with a caveat. The problem is that you are right, 'best' is indeed subjective.
Not all evaluations of recordings have to be that subjective, though. The idea of 'fidelity' is nowhere near as subjective as 'best'. And there are definitely some recordings that have better fidelity than others.
But fidelity is almost gone as a standard in recording (except for orchestral recordings). Most people are going after a 'sound' that is highly artificial, so there is no standard to judge this sound against like there always was in the days if high fidelity (e.g. 'Is it live or is it Memorex?). This is all well and good, but people still want a simple standard even though there really isn't one.
In particular I was listening to 'In the Year 2525' and 'Spirit in the Sky' and thought that one of the things that makes them such good songs is the imperfections in the recordings. They're not recorded in digital perfection on the highest quality hardware, they're organic products of the time with a sound determined by the situation. There's no element of trying to make it sound like a reference mix or any of that bullshit, it's just get the ideas and feelings down on tape.
Why I mentioned low fidelity is that it sometime makes something amazing to listen to. Could you imagine the Throbbing Gristle material recorded and produced in the way that modern recordings are made? Or 'Third' by Soft Machine? It would ruin them.
I couldn't agree more. Considering how rushed people were to get in and out of the studio because of the expense and the fact that they had such limited equipment, it's amazing that things got recorded anywhere near as well as they did.SODDI wrote:Stuff like "Higher and Higher" by Jackie Wilson and "Sugar Pie Honey Bunch" sound amazing to this day despite the fact that they were usually recorded on a 2-track and released in glorious mono (versions you hear these days have been stereo-ized.
The guys who recorded, produced and mastered those tracks were fu**ing geniuses. I am in total awe of them.
thesehibidy wrote: Jeff Buckley, GRHS.........wow, some FAB stuff there
Rumors? Might be the BEST EVER. I mean, I don't care if you like FM or not....that was mixed and sounds f**king superb.
Steely Dan "Aja" could be a close second. That is a real benchmark in sonic quality imho.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026