Hey, that sounds good. Dmitry seems to be a top guy (obsessed with guitar sounds and DSP perhaps even more than me) and Diversion... is now my go-to place for sound design unless it's sample based. Nothing else comes close to me.Sampleconstruct wrote:I started a moderated group for Diversion sounds on Soundcloud, check it out here:
http://soundcloud.com/groups/sounds-of-diversion
Diversion for MacOS released
-
- KVRian
- 996 posts since 14 Jun, 2012 from Toronto, Canada
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 455 posts since 3 Nov, 2009
Thanks guys for your kind words! I'm checking the crash Simon. Excellent sounds as always. 
-
- KVRist
- 78 posts since 19 Apr, 2010 from Amsterdam, Holland
Hi Dmitry,
I'm demoing the Diversion and I really like the synth.
I was just wondering...Does Diversion support multi-core CPU?
Can we expect more optimalisation for CPU-usage?
It brings my system down to its knees very quickly.
I was also wondering if the is any difference in quality when you render a track or realtime performance....In other words is the oversampling rate the same for rendering as in realtime?
Thanks in advance
I'm demoing the Diversion and I really like the synth.
I was just wondering...Does Diversion support multi-core CPU?
Can we expect more optimalisation for CPU-usage?
It brings my system down to its knees very quickly.
I was also wondering if the is any difference in quality when you render a track or realtime performance....In other words is the oversampling rate the same for rendering as in realtime?
Thanks in advance
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
It is a bit of a CPU monster, but the sound quality is amazing! 
One possible bug I've noticed is that changing the oversampling cause the Logic CPU metre to spike severely. Because the oversampling setting is saved with each preset, changing presets is causing regular CPU spikes.
I have not tested the Mac/VST or Win version yet.
Peace,
Andy.
One possible bug I've noticed is that changing the oversampling cause the Logic CPU metre to spike severely. Because the oversampling setting is saved with each preset, changing presets is causing regular CPU spikes.
I have not tested the Mac/VST or Win version yet.
Peace,
Andy.
... space is the place ...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 455 posts since 3 Nov, 2009
Hi Martin, the plugin is single-threaded. There are too many dependencies between voices and no algorithms which can be straightly split up into threads. So Diversion won't be multi-threaded. Also real-time playing and rendering have the same settings, no difference here. Diversion has already optimized, there will be no further performance improvements. The synth's architecture is heavy on CPU by design, not by lack of optimizations. The only way is to change architecture in order to reduce CPU load.
Thanks Andy, I'll check the spike in Logic. It shouldn't be severe, something around 5-10% CPU on my PC.
Thanks Andy, I'll check the spike in Logic. It shouldn't be severe, something around 5-10% CPU on my PC.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
Something dreamy with 2 patches:
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/d ... -diversion
and something edgy with 1 patch:
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/t ... -diversion
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/d ... -diversion
and something edgy with 1 patch:
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/t ... -diversion
-
- KVRist
- 78 posts since 19 Apr, 2010 from Amsterdam, Holland
Thanks for your response Dmitry.
Actually, I found out that the thing which stresses my CPU the most is the AMP release parameter.
When I turn the amp decay and sustain up to max nothing really happens CPU wise...maybe increase of about 5%. But when the release is turned up it turns haywire.
Is this the way it should work? I'm working with Live 8.3.4(32 bit)
Thanks
Actually, I found out that the thing which stresses my CPU the most is the AMP release parameter.
When I turn the amp decay and sustain up to max nothing really happens CPU wise...maybe increase of about 5%. But when the release is turned up it turns haywire.
Is this the way it should work? I'm working with Live 8.3.4(32 bit)
Thanks
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
Chiming in here - higher release->more voices used as each voice is still active until it has fully decayed, so when e.g. playing a 4 note chord and then another one, 8 voices will be active until the first chord has fully decayed.Martin Simon wrote:Thanks for your response Dmitry.
Actually, I found out that the thing which stresses my CPU the most is the AMP release parameter.
When I turn the amp decay and sustain up to max nothing really happens CPU wise...maybe increase of about 5%. But when the release is turned up it turns haywire.
Is this the way it should work? I'm working with Live 8.3.4(32 bit)
Thanks
-
- KVRist
- 78 posts since 19 Apr, 2010 from Amsterdam, Holland
Ah yes,
But isn't that happening when the decay is turned up as well?
Obviously, this gets worse with high voice count, unison and rapidly played notes.
I'm a bit whining about this CPU thing, I know.
I guess I really like the synth, but it should be usable in a production, right?
But isn't that happening when the decay is turned up as well?
Obviously, this gets worse with high voice count, unison and rapidly played notes.
I'm a bit whining about this CPU thing, I know.
I guess I really like the synth, but it should be usable in a production, right?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 455 posts since 3 Nov, 2009
Sure Martin, number of voices played depends on AmpEnv release, while decay doesn't affect voice management. The longer release the more voices are playing simultaneously. This is very important for unison. High unison count plus long release is a real CPU killer. Try to keep release and unison count as lower as possible, otherwise DAW freeze function is the only way to deal. 
-
- KVRAF
- 2747 posts since 13 Feb, 2012 from Amsterdam
No worries Dmitry, in a few years CPU's will be even faster and it won't be as much of an issue. Look at Massive, when it came out, people thought it was heavy on the CPU, but now, it's considered quite light.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
I'm still having the "vanishing sound" problem, especially with temposyned sequences, sound drops out completely, then one has to flip through some other patches several times until sound is retrieved, then it drops out again and so on.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
3 new patches in one Urban SciFi Fusion Calypso whatever demo:
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/u ... usion-demo
http://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/u ... usion-demo
- KVRist
- 487 posts since 30 May, 2002 from Scotland
yeah, I've noticed that happening too, but not found a definite way to reproduce it yet, altho it seems to happen more with some patches than others.Sampleconstruct wrote:I'm still having the "vanishing sound" problem, especially with temposyned sequences, sound drops out completely, then one has to flip through some other patches several times until sound is retrieved, then it drops out again and so on.
"Its my firm belief that its a mistake to hold firm beliefs"
https://soundcloud.com/biomechanoid
https://soundcloud.com/biomechanoid
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 455 posts since 3 Nov, 2009
I also got it few times and working on it. Something strange here, soon will fix that.

