There is an interesting discussion about visual representation of sound and it's quality.
Would be great if anybody could give some feedback.
The main talk is about sound morphing based on visual representation and I think experiences with Photosounder could help.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 76#5250376
The main point is, do we loose significant sound quality, if we convert audio into a picture and vice versa?
Quality of sound?
-
- KVRist
- 138 posts since 31 Mar, 2004 from Nuremberg
-
- KVRian
- 1057 posts since 6 May, 2008 from Poland
Yes we dotweiss2000 wrote:The main point is, do we loose significant sound quality, if we convert audio into a picture and vice versa?
-
- KVRAF
- 4380 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
To me though, this gives to the resynthesized sounds the nice digital & characteristic spectral feel that is unachievable otherwise.
-
- KVRian
- 1057 posts since 6 May, 2008 from Poland
Do you mean that you actually like the effect it gives to sound when Photosounder resynthesises them? I figured this day would come haha, I just never could get to like that effect.Neon Breath wrote:To me though, this gives to the resynthesized sounds the nice digital & characteristic spectral feel that is unachievable otherwise.
-
- KVRAF
- 4380 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
Yes I do! 
I always liked the characteristic sound of spectral resynthesis in general.
I always liked the characteristic sound of spectral resynthesis in general.