KVR Audio

budweiser · Post by **budweiser** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:18 pm

robojam wrote:

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:31 pm

debra1rlo wrote:
robojam wrote:
debra1rlo wrote: @ thread
"Dear mirkin..."

for some strange reason these bitwig threads are suddenly more amusing to me.

no smirkin at teh mirkin.

debra1rlo · Post by **debra1rlo** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:35 pm

vastarray · Post by **vastarray** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:19 pm

Can anyone name a new DAW that came out in the last few years priced over $100?

deleted · Post by **deleted** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:35 pm

DELETED

Dean Aka Nekro · Post by **Dean Aka Nekro** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:05 pm

vastarray wrote:Bitwig... make me a table. That's it. Just a table.

"A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Bitwig, make me a table.

standalone · Post by **standalone** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:24 pm

kangul wrote:
vastarray wrote: Forget Linux, they don't even have interface drivers.
Hehe, who exactly don't have interface drivers? Let's get it straight: most hardware manufacturers are too greedy to invest their money into software development for non-mainstream OS'. But that's the problem with their greed, not with Linux. And we really need more DAWs for Linux to force audio hardware manufacturers consider to start driver development for alternative operating systems. Just for one reason: current state of software market (one garbage OS, one pricey hardware-dependent OS) is simply wrong. We just need better mainstream OS (at least free from spyware and malware), and for me this argument is enough to support Bitwig.

How quaint. The reason way there are no drivers or malware for Linux is the same, nobody cares for it. You call developers greedy for ignoring Linux, I call them sensible.

Linux is as insecure as any other piece of software and only protects through obscurity: Coding malware for it is not profitable.

And I'm not sure, but some people say that the Linux version of Bitwig has been somewhat left behind.

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:48 pm

vastarray wrote:Can anyone name a new DAW that came out in the last few years priced over $100?

Live 9

pc999 · Post by **pc999** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:11 pm

Just keep doing whatever you are doing...

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:56 pm

OzWozEre · Post by **OzWozEre** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:07 am

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:13 am

It's not, we're all waiting

masterhiggins · Post by **masterhiggins** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:19 am

Just make it CPU-efficient for the love of god. Let's not have another CPU black hole (cough Live).

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:56 am

I can run ungodly amounts of crazy CPU hungry stuff in live. It's best to just ignore the CPU meter, it's like S1, pretending it's not there will go a long ways to being productive

Open letter of advice to Bitwig