ValhallaVintageVerb 1.7.1. Two new reverb modes (Chaotic Hall, Chaotic Chamber)

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
ValhallaVintageVerb

Post

@midnight wrote:
bmanic wrote:Take the SSL mixing consoles for example. These were the "behringer" mixing tables at one point in time.
What are you talking about? Some alternate universe maybe?

You think an SSL 4000 was the "behringer" at some point in time? Behringer makes cheap shit even for a consumer level. What does this have to do with SSL, who make top end product?

You really have some strange opinions.
You again.. :lol:

Perhaps I should have been more specific and mentioned the price instead. I thought the " .. " quotes between the unholy word would have been sufficient but I guess some people just need to pick everything apart.

Oh well, here goes, once more and explanation of my "weird thinking".

The 4000 line was very successful due to it's price, not it's sound. A 48 channel 4000 console cost way less than a 48 channel Neve desk (this was at the time when Neve was still run by Rupert Neve and was the "real deal". Nowadays the guys who own the Neve logo and company name have quite different innards in the desks. Same goes for the AMS Neve desks. As far as I know Rupert had nothing to do with those and was in fact quite annoyed by how his name got sold around while it represented none of his vision).

Now add to this the fact that the automation mechanism option ("flying faders") cost way less for the SSL desks than any of the competition and you got a nifty little channel dynamics section per channel + the buss compressor and you basically had a cracking deal.

Was it as well engineered as the Neves and APIs? As far as I know, no. The few crazy bastards that build their own highend stuff that I've talked with usually scoff at the word "SSL" and call it mediocre at best (one of these gentlemen has the surname Knif. He builds absolutely impeccable stuff and usually knows exactly what he is talking about). Well I'm no hardware builder but I do trust their opinion and stories of the 80's desks. When something costs a lot less than something else then it's usually a sign that some corners were cut somewhere, right? Of course, Neve was already adding $$$ to the price just because of the name but still..

So yeah, I stand by my opinion. SSL and their "sound" is most definitely not due to some kind of superior quality. On the contrary. They skimped on quality and sold desks by the bucketload due to the much lower cost of the system. Thus the numbers meant that a lot of records got made on them and some of those records sold like crazy. Boom. Suddenly SSL became a household name and people started justifying the record sales due to the "special sound" of the record, often attributed to the console (because the console was THE "sex" symbol of the studios of that time).

Now bugger off and leave me alone. :hihi:

- bM
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot

"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle

Post

I would go further to the point bmanic is making and highlight how many people saw the original Moog synths as an abomination to natural sounds, because they only saw it as something to try and recreate real instruments, the true sound instruments should be.

Looking back today that seems silly, but it's no different to the same silly logic that digital has to somehow sound EXACTLY like vintage analog synths to be deemed as 'good' , which in my mind is nonsense, and a very narrow backwards approach to creating new musical tools. Same applies to fx plugs too.

What makes a track sound cold and lifeless? The producer, not the tools, or perhaps rather I should say, the producer trying to use tools to behave like other tools, rather than playing to their specific strengths.
Arksun
Music Producer | Sound Designer
www.arksun-sound.com

Post

Look bManic, you likened SSL to Behringer.

You lost your marbles, man!

I'm not going to sit here and give you a lesson as to why Trent Reznor's new studio has an SSL Duality SE, and before that he was using an SSL 4000.

Or why Chris Lord-Alge and Andy Wallace insist on using SSL 4000 to this day, including judicious use of the channel dynamics/eq and bus compressors.

I'm sure it's because they skimp on quality and that's why they choose to use them.

You know... because the sound isn't as good! That's why Lady Gaga records are mixed on SSL. f**k good sound. 8)
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

Post

This thread, it's WAY too strange.

Post

Arksun wrote:I would go further to the point bmanic is making and highlight how many people saw the original Moog synths as an abomination to natural sounds, because they only saw it as something to try and recreate real instruments, the true sound instruments should be.

Looking back today that seems silly, but it's no different to the same silly logic that digital has to somehow sound EXACTLY like vintage analog synths to be deemed as 'good' , which in my mind is nonsense, and a very narrow backwards approach to creating new musical tools. Same applies to fx plugs too.
This is just not true. Musical technology reached its peak in 1984, as did music in general. Anything that happened beyond this time is an ABOMINATION, I tell you.

Valhalla DSP: IT JEST AIN'T NATURAL¡™

:D

I tend to strike an uneasy balance between loving the past and embracing the future. I am fascinated by the solutions that were developed by engineers of yore to create things with the resources they have, and those solutions inform my current work - but these solutions aren't any sort of holy writ. There are a lot of things that are purely digital that are AMAZING, and I want to explore more of that in future plugins.

Sean Costello

Post

hibidy wrote:This thread, it's WAY too strange.
I vaguely recall discussing some sort of digital reverberator, or something...
:hihi:

Post

@midnight wrote:Look bManic, you likened SSL to Behringer.

You lost your marbles, man!

I'm not going to sit here and give you a lesson as to why Trent Reznor's new studio has an SSL Duality SE, and before that he was using an SSL 4000.

Or why Chris Lord-Alge and Andy Wallace insist on using SSL 4000 to this day, including judicious use of the channel dynamics/eq and bus compressors.

I'm sure it's because they skimp on quality and that's why they choose to use them.

You know... because the sound isn't as good! That's why Lady Gaga records are mixed on SSL. f**k good sound. 8)


(edit: no disrespect intended to any of the above artists/engineers, just that the argument that "x uses y proves the superiority of y" is a bit absurd)
Last edited by valhallasound on Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

bk wrote:
hibidy wrote:This thread, it's WAY too strange.
I vaguely recall discussing some sort of digital reverberator, or something...
:hihi:
lolz

Post

@midnight wrote:Look bManic, you likened SSL to Behringer.

You lost your marbles, man!

I'm not going to sit here and give you a lesson as to why Trent Reznor's new studio has an SSL Duality SE, and before that he was using an SSL 4000.

Or why Chris Lord-Alge and Andy Wallace insist on using SSL 4000 to this day, including judicious use of the channel dynamics/eq and bus compressors.

I'm sure it's because they skimp on quality and that's why they choose to use them.

You know... because the sound isn't as good! That's why Lady Gaga records are mixed on SSL. f**k good sound. 8)
Ohhh... trent oh-faking-mighy razor... chris-oh-my-lord...

Stop the name dropping. bM's totally right. I haven't had the pleasure to play with those desks (although I'm at the right age) but talking to someone who cut his teeth on analog desks, he said the SSL's were considered - at the time - "thin and stingy".

Time to go to sleep, Midnight :D
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

***BREAKING NEWS***

If a console is not the most expensive (overpriced) on the market, then that means the quality is skimped, the sound as shit, and you are forever doomed to be scoffed at by the internet!

***BREAKING NEWS***

Hey Sean, I'm going to fix your quote for you!

(edit: no disrespect intended to any of the above artists/engineers, just that the argument that "x is more expensive y proves the superiority of y" is a bit absurd)

Because that's essentially what people are saying here! Neve and API are more expensive! SSL SKIMPS ON QUALITY!!!
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

Post

valhallasound wrote: I tend to strike an uneasy balance between loving the past and embracing the future. I am fascinated by the solutions that were developed by engineers of yore to create things with the resources they have, and those solutions inform my current work - but these solutions aren't any sort of holy writ. There are a lot of things that are purely digital that are AMAZING, and I want to explore more of that in future plugins.

Sean Costello
Amen to that!. It's an approach Urs has as well I think.
Arksun
Music Producer | Sound Designer
www.arksun-sound.com

Post

bk wrote:
hibidy wrote:This thread, it's WAY too strange.
I vaguely recall discussing some sort of digital reverberator, or something...
:hihi:
Really? I thought it was about a controversial floating point number generation system that ran afoul of the culturally accepted default value rules.
perception: the stuff reality is made of.

Post

Tp3 wrote:
Stop the name dropping. bM's totally right. I haven't had the pleasure to play with those desks (although I'm at the right age) but talking to someone who cut his teeth on analog desks, he said the SSL's were considered - at the time - "thin and stingy".

Time to go to sleep, Midnight :D
it's differents animals... depending the style of music one or the other will make the work easier .

ssl and neve sound could not be much more different.. it s like comparing a 1176 to a varimu , both compresor but no point arguin wich one is best , cost the most to make ect..
Last edited by Fred_Abstract on Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:24 pm, edited 6 times in total.

Post

mandolarian wrote:
bk wrote:
hibidy wrote:This thread, it's WAY too strange.
I vaguely recall discussing some sort of digital reverberator, or something...
:hihi:
Really? I thought it was about a controversial floating point number generation system that ran afoul of the culturally accepted default value rules.
Who can keep up, we've covered quite a bit of ground :hihi:

Post

Hi Sean,

Just a quick ot question here: i read on gearslutz (discord3 topic) that you programmed audio damage eos?

is this true?

Thanks,

Phil
Finally!

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”