Available Soon: Orgelwerke for Kontakt
-
- KVRAF
- 2357 posts since 24 Nov, 2012
I'm going to differ and say it sounds fine to me - a bit reverb-y and distant in the demos, but I'm not hearing the synth thing at all. And as far as the distance thing goes, that just seems a function of where you recorded it - which would sit nicely in the mix for a lot of uses
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
Thanks for the suggestion, I understand the reverb here is very important for a good emulation.murnau wrote:you should really put out your organ demotracks with a churchlike convolution reverb.
In the meantime EvilDragon tested the current version:
Alright, it must be the demos. This doesn't sound as synthy as the demo
I think that the computer feeling of the MIDI files add an artificial feeling.
@Woggle: thank you for your feedback
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
- KVRAF
- 5564 posts since 13 Jan, 2005 from the bottom of my heart
much better! great!MaxSynths wrote:Just a quick recording for test purposes, does it sound a bit better?
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.
-
- KVRian
- 628 posts since 18 May, 2010
I still hear the plucky attack, in the chords, and in the single high notes. Do these waves all have an envelope as the wave you showed above? That would be weird, because it really sounds like fast attack, fast decay, sustain a few dB under the attack.
If you recorded them really closely, that might a problem too. Under normal circumstances, we hear the tone filtered by the environment (the box in which the pipes reside, the church walls, etc.). The direct sound reaches our ears, but relatively softly. I've attached .5s of the wave form of a rather soft sounding organ sample, and you can see several overlapping attacks, even though the sample itself is not really wet.
Perhaps you need to create a suggestion of more distance between the listener and the sound source, and/or add some low pass filtering.
Inlining doesn't work, the image is here: http://imgur.com/KMs8cLH
If you recorded them really closely, that might a problem too. Under normal circumstances, we hear the tone filtered by the environment (the box in which the pipes reside, the church walls, etc.). The direct sound reaches our ears, but relatively softly. I've attached .5s of the wave form of a rather soft sounding organ sample, and you can see several overlapping attacks, even though the sample itself is not really wet.
Perhaps you need to create a suggestion of more distance between the listener and the sound source, and/or add some low pass filtering.
Inlining doesn't work, the image is here: http://imgur.com/KMs8cLH
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4585 posts since 2 Nov, 2006
@murnau: thanks 
Attack comparison
Thanks again for the feedback
I must admit the higher notes have a slightly shorter attack. The following is a test with four different attacks levels, do you hear any improvement as the attack is increased (part 3 and 4 seems)?FLWrd wrote:I still hear the plucky attack, in the chords, and in the single high notes. Do these waves all have an envelope as the wave you showed above?
Attack comparison
Yes you are right, this is very important and it's something I'm working on rigth now.Perhaps you need to create a suggestion of more distance between the listener and the sound source, and/or add some low pass filtering.
Thanks again for the feedback
