Sad days for app designers!
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 25 Jun, 2010
--How would you like to be an app designer and you were working on this synth app only to see that Nave and Thor were released? I place GB and Sampletank in a different category but these two synth apps do so much, if someone can produce something that beats these two apps then they are obviously lightyears ahead of me (anyone who can produce any app is already lightyears of me anyway).
Now if someone can develop an app that produces the guitar strumming effects like GB but allows the pitch to be determined via midi!!
Now if someone can develop an app that produces the guitar strumming effects like GB but allows the pitch to be determined via midi!!
- Banned
- 1583 posts since 19 Aug, 2011
Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function | http://soundcloud.com/bmoorebeats
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Weird logicScott Murrell wrote:if someone can produce something that beats these two apps then they are obviously lightyears ahead of me (anyone who can produce any app is already lightyears of me anyway).
Did you feel the same way about Doom when that was released?
Just when it came out it felt that it was the best ever, lightyears ahead, how could it be surpassed?
But then you get better machinery, more complex OS's, and then you get Quake, and then you get Half-Life, etc etc
Same thing will happen again...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 478 posts since 25 Jun, 2010
Numanoid wrote:Weird logicScott Murrell wrote:if someone can produce something that beats these two apps then they are obviously lightyears ahead of me (anyone who can produce any app is already lightyears of me anyway).![]()
Did you feel the same way about Doom when that was released?
Just when it came out it felt that it was the best ever, lightyears ahead, how could it be surpassed?
But then you get better machinery, more complex OS's, and then you get Quake, and then you get Half-Life, etc etc
Same thing will happen again...
Don't have time for games so I just get the apps that do the most for me with the least amount of effort but you're right, setting the bar higher will force those who wish to compete to do something different and better. It's a good thing.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 478 posts since 25 Jun, 2010
Don't hurt yourself banging your head on whatever! LOLBMoore wrote:
In case you missed it here was the gist of my post:
"if someone can produce something that beats these two apps then they are obviously lightyears ahead of me (anyone who can produce any app is already lightyears of me anyway)."
Just an observation and a shout out to the developers of two very fine synths, you may disagree which is your right and I don't care....I'm happy and I paid for them so I have nothing to bang my head about...LOL
-
- KVRian
- 539 posts since 3 Apr, 2008 from State of Confusion
So I wasn't the only guy playin' Doom?
Oh, then Hexen, then Quake (still one of my favorites) and then I never got to Half-Life cuz I was makin' music...
It's cyclical, except every time the loop comes around something gets added or improved.
Sometimes it gets screwed up when the dev(s) makes a drastic change to the interface/workflow, then people look elsewhere, or stay at a previous rev.
Besides, I have about 200 Vsti's, most of which sound the same, but have different approaches to accessing oscillators, filters etc.
Oh, then Hexen, then Quake (still one of my favorites) and then I never got to Half-Life cuz I was makin' music...
It's cyclical, except every time the loop comes around something gets added or improved.
Sometimes it gets screwed up when the dev(s) makes a drastic change to the interface/workflow, then people look elsewhere, or stay at a previous rev.
Besides, I have about 200 Vsti's, most of which sound the same, but have different approaches to accessing oscillators, filters etc.
"All generalizations are false".
"Don't quantize me bro"!
"Don't quantize me bro"!
-
- KVRer
- 15 posts since 28 Jan, 2013 from San Francisco, CA
Scott, can you clarify this? I'm the developer of guitarism and am looking to add a "MIDI In" IAP at some point soon, would like to understand the kinds of things people want to do with MIDI for guitar strumming appsScott Murrell wrote:--Now if someone can develop an app that produces the guitar strumming effects like GB but allows the pitch to be determined via midi!!
-
- KVRian
- 539 posts since 3 Apr, 2008 from State of Confusion
Rhism, I think Guitarism is a wonderful app as is, especially since you added the midi out function.
My take on the midi in would be to hit a note in a lower octave that decides the type of chord, (major/minor) etc. then hit the actual note higher on the keyboard that the chord is based upon.
It might also be nice to select whether the strum is up or down too.
Scott may have a different take on this though.
Thanks for a nice app Rhism.
My take on the midi in would be to hit a note in a lower octave that decides the type of chord, (major/minor) etc. then hit the actual note higher on the keyboard that the chord is based upon.
It might also be nice to select whether the strum is up or down too.
Scott may have a different take on this though.
Thanks for a nice app Rhism.
Last edited by martygras on Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"All generalizations are false".
"Don't quantize me bro"!
"Don't quantize me bro"!
-
- KVRian
- 631 posts since 19 Sep, 2012
I would like it if the app would recognise an incoming chord or the nearest equivalent to it. The manual should explain which chords are valid.
Velocity of the chord could be picked up from here as well
The lowest guitar note is midi40 for standard tuning
Therefore notes below that could be used to indicate strum / picking patterns and it should continue to play this until it gets the note off from the original chord
Ideally it woulld also output either the new midi data or the guitar sounds or both.
Finally as a nice to have users would be able to make their own strum/plucking patterns
Thanks for the invitation to comment
Velocity of the chord could be picked up from here as well
The lowest guitar note is midi40 for standard tuning
Therefore notes below that could be used to indicate strum / picking patterns and it should continue to play this until it gets the note off from the original chord
Ideally it woulld also output either the new midi data or the guitar sounds or both.
Finally as a nice to have users would be able to make their own strum/plucking patterns
Thanks for the invitation to comment
Instant human just add coffee
-
- KVRer
- 15 posts since 28 Jan, 2013 from San Francisco, CA
Thanks for the details Bianca!
Question: why do you want to have keyboard keys trigger strums (Marty's suggestion) or strumming / picking patterns (Bianca's suggestion) rather than just playing those on the app itself? Not saying these are bad suggestions, just want to understand your reasons for wanting them.
Question: why do you want to have keyboard keys trigger strums (Marty's suggestion) or strumming / picking patterns (Bianca's suggestion) rather than just playing those on the app itself? Not saying these are bad suggestions, just want to understand your reasons for wanting them.
-
- KVRian
- 631 posts since 19 Sep, 2012
Rhism wrote:Thanks for the details Bianca!
Question: why do you want to have keyboard keys trigger strums (Marty's suggestion) or strumming / picking patterns (Bianca's suggestion) rather than just playing those on the app itself? Not saying these are bad suggestions, just want to understand your reasons for wanting them.
Honestly because my timing sucks, I wouldn't be generating the strums from a keyboard but from the piano roll off a daw.
Instant human just add coffee
- KVRAF
- 7196 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
@Rhism I want to chime in on the Guitarism Midi thing while you are listening!
One thing that I'd really like to be able to do, is set my tempo really slow, and then play Guitarism and have the midi output recorded. Then, I can speed up the tempo to the speed of my song and play back my part in Guitarism. This allows me to play very detailed parts (that I normally wouldn't be able to play alone).
Garageband allows for this, but I don't want to keep Garageband on my system just for this feature alone (especially when I so dislike the effects and other aspects of Garageband). So, in short, I'd like to be able to have my played output sync'ed to tempo and recorded as Midi by my sequencer of choice. Then, I would speed up the tempo to the speed I want my song to be played at, and the sequencer would send the recorded midi output back to Guitarism, and play the part again but at the new tempo. Does that make sense?
Also, how are things coming with the IAP instrument packs? I'm really looking forward to an electric guitar!!!
Thanks again!
--Sean
Also, how are things coming with the IAP instrument packs? I'm really looking forward to an electric guitar!!!
--Sean
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
- KVRAF
- 7196 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
Wouldn't what I'm suggesting work as well if not better? Record at half the tempo, and then play it back at regular tempo. It would be MUCH easier to get correct timing, while also keeping the guitar feel that may well be lost if you start using a keyboard to trigger guitar strums.BiancaNeve wrote:Rhism wrote:Thanks for the details Bianca!
Question: why do you want to have keyboard keys trigger strums (Marty's suggestion) or strumming / picking patterns (Bianca's suggestion) rather than just playing those on the app itself? Not saying these are bad suggestions, just want to understand your reasons for wanting them.
Honestly because my timing sucks, I wouldn't be generating the strums from a keyboard but from the piano roll off a daw.
--Sean
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRian
- 631 posts since 19 Sep, 2012
The point is I can't play guitar, that's why I and so many other people like the auto strum feature on garageband, but lots of people complain that there.is no way to get the midi out of garageband.audiojunkie wrote:Wouldn't what I'm suggesting work as well if not better? Record at half the tempo, and then play it back at regular tempo. It would be MUCH easier to get correct timing, while also keeping the guitar feel that may well be lost if you start using a keyboard to trigger guitar strums.BiancaNeve wrote:Rhism wrote:Thanks for the details Bianca!
Question: why do you want to have keyboard keys trigger strums (Marty's suggestion) or strumming / picking patterns (Bianca's suggestion) rather than just playing those on the app itself? Not saying these are bad suggestions, just want to understand your reasons for wanting them.
Honestly because my timing sucks, I wouldn't be generating the strums from a keyboard but from the piano roll off a daw.
--Sean
I think what you're asking for can already be achieved via Audiobus and the daw of your choice (as long as it has midi)
Instant human just add coffee