Logic Pro X
-
- KVRist
- 475 posts since 4 Nov, 2011 from Tleat
A little niche observation here, but would have been really nice to see an implementation of a Flex Pitch-like control for MIDI or automatable parameters in Piano Roll. See http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/201 ... pector.jpg if the squigly lines could be synth parameters, would add a very intimate and streamlined approach to synth expression programming (hah, almost an oxymoron), I believe. But probably me being silly..
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 1 Mar, 2013
Paying for Logic 9 and Logic X is still less than the price of Cubase 7.fmr wrote:For someone already using Logic Pro 9, 200 is too much, I think. And what it brings new is also not that much, when compared with, for example, Cubase 7.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 1 Mar, 2013
since it's an "app" now they don't have any upgrade path. just like all apps have to be repurchased when a new version arrives.pc999 wrote:No upgrade price? (if you call that a upgrade it seems a 3 month work for Reaper or image-line guys)
Damm this big companies...
-
- KVRAF
- 14740 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Why do I have a feeling that Logic X looks awefully like StudioONE and Ableton Live?
Also, if they dropped 32bit, is there no brige?
Else, I'm also worried about the "App Store" thingy, if that really is the case.
Dunno what to think of it. But 200quids - is a steal considering what you get, and what Logic once cost! Only if it'd clean of all bugs...
Also, if they dropped 32bit, is there no brige?
Else, I'm also worried about the "App Store" thingy, if that really is the case.
Dunno what to think of it. But 200quids - is a steal considering what you get, and what Logic once cost! Only if it'd clean of all bugs...
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 1 Mar, 2013
Just pretend Logic 9 cost you $500+ like every other pro level DAW. $200 is your upgrade price.. not bad!telogic wrote:where is the upgrade price???
- KVRAF
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
So i assume there no implementation of the ARA tech. like it has been the case in studio one ?Captain wrote:Yep, Melodyne's algorithms are superior to pretty much anything. The only problem is the hassle of transferring the audio to the plugin, and all the difficulties caused by it playing the audio, instead of the DAW... Because of that, I usually end up using Logic's flex audio for timing stuff. With its artifacts and all, but I'm already pretty good in keeping them to minimum.Sampleconstruct wrote: I always preferred Melodyne over Logic's Flex anyway because it produces much less artifacts when correcting timing issues, if it's the same with Flex pitch then...well...have to try it first but won't be upgrading for a while anyway.
Melodyne is a class on it's own with polyphonic note editing and the possibility to disconnect the harmonics of a sound from the root note and then mangle the harmonics around to produce something totally new.
I have been dreaming of a system where you could edit time & pitch directly in the DAW, using Melodyne's algorithms. Flex Pitch is definitely a step in the right direction. Celemony's ARA looks like an ideal solution, I just wish it would be implemeted in Logic. (One can always hope...)
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 90 posts since 31 Jan, 2006 from Boston, MA
I searched the new documentation and found no reference to Logic Node, i.e. resource sharing between two computers. Is this feature gone?
I witnessed the Nice, France terrorist attack, told the story with a music video: https://youtu.be/eHhw4Bl9HOs
- KVRAF
- 37536 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
So anyone got this running alongside Logic 9. I really can't give up a 32 bit version at the moment but if I could replace my 64 bit Logic 9 with this that might be enough. What I don't want though is 2 sets of the same sample libs taking up lots of GIGs or to find they have been overwritten by the new version and won't load in Logic 9 any more.
-
- KVRist
- 46 posts since 7 May, 2013 from Finland
Yes! Finally! Just finished downloading the LogicX and testing the new features.
By the way, I jst noticed that there is a free 46min tutorial video by MacProVideo that shows the new stuff:
http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/log ... ogic-pro-x
By the way, I jst noticed that there is a free 46min tutorial video by MacProVideo that shows the new stuff:
http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/log ... ogic-pro-x
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
Logic X is a separate app to Logic 9, I have them installed side by side now.aMUSEd wrote:So anyone got this running alongside Logic 9.
Can't really say about the sample content. 2 GB is automatically downloaded when the app is first launched, this cannot be cancelled the app won't start without it. Not sure how much space that consumes when expanded.
There is an optional 39 GB to download. This is automatically started but can be cancelled / resumed any time (I cancelled).
Perhaps because the 39 GB content was cancelled changing drum kits / drummers seems to require a separate download, but this can also be cancelled.
Peace,
Andy.
... space is the place ...
- KVRAF
- 3362 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Already mentioned, dude.miskaseppa wrote:Yes! Finally! Just finished downloading the LogicX and testing the new features.
By the way, I jst noticed that there is a free 46min tutorial video by MacProVideo that shows the new stuff:
http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/log ... ogic-pro-x
cryophonik wrote:FYI - MacProVideo already has a "New Features" tutorial for Logic X. Watching it now and some of the new features are very cool.
http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/log ... ogic-pro-x
-
- KVRAF
- 2454 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
What's with Steve Horelick's delivery. Its like he's talking to a goochy goochy baby. I almost can't watch it. Good teacher no doubt but the way he talks makes me feel totally insane. Not his fault. Just saying. And curious if anyone else feels this way.miskaseppa wrote: http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/log ... ogic-pro-x
-
- KVRian
- 806 posts since 1 Sep, 2008 from US
I'm excited if flex-pitch does even a half decent job. Melodyne is great if you have a consistent tempo grid.. Last time tried to correct some vocals on a live mix that bloody thing can't even stay in sync for more than couple bars w my edited tempo list whatsoever (plugin or rewire).Krakatau wrote:So i assume there no implementation of the ARA tech. like it has been the case in studio one ?Captain wrote:Yep, Melodyne's algorithms are superior to pretty much anything. The only problem is the hassle of transferring the audio to the plugin, and all the difficulties caused by it playing the audio, instead of the DAW... Because of that, I usually end up using Logic's flex audio for timing stuff. With its artifacts and all, but I'm already pretty good in keeping them to minimum.Sampleconstruct wrote: I always preferred Melodyne over Logic's Flex anyway because it produces much less artifacts when correcting timing issues, if it's the same with Flex pitch then...well...have to try it first but won't be upgrading for a while anyway.
Melodyne is a class on it's own with polyphonic note editing and the possibility to disconnect the harmonics of a sound from the root note and then mangle the harmonics around to produce something totally new.
I have been dreaming of a system where you could edit time & pitch directly in the DAW, using Melodyne's algorithms. Flex Pitch is definitely a step in the right direction. Celemony's ARA looks like an ideal solution, I just wish it would be implemeted in Logic. (One can always hope...)
