KVR Audio

vega555 · Post by **vega555** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:42 pm

Spire Synthesizer update to v1.0.1
==========================
- Fixed: Issues with FX MUTE

sqigls · Post by **sqigls** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:43 pm

BDeep wrote:
sqigls wrote:I open Spire x32 in Live 9 or Cubase 6.5 and my CPU use is 0%. 0%-1% if the GUI is open. I run OSX 10.8.4 and use RME Fireface. i7 2.7 GHz.
Then they really did improve the Mac version a lot didn't they? I'll have to re-evaluate it again when I get home, thanks.

That's idling tho. In use it's a tad better than it was, but not amazing.
For example the patch "LD Introduce" (using a 1 bar sequence of 5 notes) is reading 20% usage in Live 9, whatever that means? 1 core? 8 cores i don't know?

BDeep · Post by **BDeep** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:50 pm

Ah, thanks, as said, I will give it another shot later today.

Muziksculp · Post by **Muziksculp** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:53 pm

soundpalace wrote:It's amazing how quickly this synth has become my go-to synth. I absolutely LOVE IT!!!

Yes, and Spire is dangerously addictive.

They need to add a WARNING about how great, and addictive this synth is, which can lead to sleepless nights

I have not had some decent sleep since I began programming it, It's an AMAZING Synth.

woodsdenis · Post by **woodsdenis** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:34 pm

sqigls wrote:
BDeep wrote:
sqigls wrote:I open Spire x32 in Live 9 or Cubase 6.5 and my CPU use is 0%. 0%-1% if the GUI is open. I run OSX 10.8.4 and use RME Fireface. i7 2.7 GHz.
Then they really did improve the Mac version a lot didn't they? I'll have to re-evaluate it again when I get home, thanks.
That's idling tho. In use it's a tad better than it was, but not amazing.
For example the patch "LD Introduce" (using a 1 bar sequence of 5 notes) is reading 20% usage in Live 9, whatever that means? 1 core? 8 cores i don't know?

Live 9 performance meter is very misleading anyway, has been discussed many times on Ableton forums. Only way really to judge performance or enhancements is to pick a patch and then test it on the same DAW, computer and system. That probably can only be done individually.

Elektronisch · Post by **Elektronisch** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:10 pm

Check CPU & Ram usage without Spire

Now this is with Spire 1.0.0

Futhermore, i have tried latest version 1.0.1 with hope solving this but its same :/

luiz.toniolo · Post by **luiz.toniolo** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:00 pm

Just tested this synth. Guys, this is pretty CPU hog. You guys should focus on Code Optimazation, make it lighter about CPU usage...

mothergarage · Post by **mothergarage** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:37 pm

As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.

edit: Sorry, this wasn't very constructive.

But

1) The installer doesn't remember where previous versions where installed.

2) It insists on installing the 32bit version to "Program Files (x86)".

TheKid · Post by **TheKid** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:51 pm

mothergarage wrote:As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.

!!!!!+1000!

pinkpanther · Post by **pinkpanther** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:13 pm

mothergarage wrote:As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.

Installer is not the only thing sucking cock in hell

Maybe they drink too much Vodka

sound_dev · Post by **sound_dev** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:14 pm

TheKid wrote:
mothergarage wrote:As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.
!!!!!+1000!

Latest installer version remembers install place, and looking for standard VST paths in registry mentioned above in this topic

zvenx · Post by **zvenx** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:19 pm

It basically doesn't remember where you installed the previous version.
rsp

zvenx · Post by **zvenx** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:21 pm

sound_dev wrote:
TheKid wrote:
mothergarage wrote:As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.
!!!!!+1000!
Latest installer version remembers install place, and looking for standard VST paths in registry mentioned above in this topic

I just installed 1.01 and it defaulted to where it has always defaulted....let me go look what the registry says.
rsp

edit:
Indeed my Wow6432Node had the wrong value.

rsp

pinkpanther · Post by **pinkpanther** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:22 pm

sounddev wrote:Detailed description

- Sucks cock: The act of sucking ones penis (slang of very bad).
- In hell: A place where you get poked with pitchforks by red men with horns and goatlegs and listen to Justin Bieber sing for the rest of eternity.

sound_dev · Post by **sound_dev** » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:24 pm

zvenx wrote:
sound_dev wrote:
TheKid wrote:
mothergarage wrote:As much as I like this synth, please fix your windows installer as it does whatever it wants. This installer sucks cock in hell.
!!!!!+1000!
Latest installer version remembers install place, and looking for standard VST paths in registry mentioned above in this topic
I just installed 1.01 and it defaulted to where it has always defaulted....let me go look what the registry says.
rsp

HKLM\Software\RevealSound\Spire\InstallDir