KVR Audio

ksandvik · Post by **ksandvik** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:47 pm

I would say Satin just to avoid the dreadful iLok.

Compyfox · Post by **Compyfox** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:07 pm

Just read this:

sascha wrote:We might expand the number of available companders in the future, which has to be decided at some point later.

If C-type and S-type (however this might be possible!) will be implemented at a later state, I'm definitely game. I probably still have a sh*t-ton of C-type recorded tapes lying around. But B is definitely an interim solution.

Man, why did I never tag the tapes properly back in the days. Oh wait, I wasn't that much into audio engineering, so I didn't care.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:13 pm

[DELETED]

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:25 pm

[DELETED]

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:26 pm

[DELETED]

xalama qo · Post by **xalama qo** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:03 pm

Ch00rD wrote:
penguinfromdeep wrote:I dunno, I'm not exactly floored with this ... It sounds good but it never seems to go dirty enough especially when using the tape delay and the distortion is too clean and hi-fi and the wobble doesn't sound convincing for me (I own couple of hardware tape delays myself). Might be just my tastes, I like it dirty But kudos for this, it's definitely very good and I might end up purchasing it anyway
I actually like the wobbliness of the tape delay.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/876 ... Wobble.mp3

That's utterly bizarre, and totally cool!

J4R1O · Post by **J4R1O** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:17 pm

Just found a buyer for my old Digitech VX400 and I'm gonna spend that money on... you guessed it: Satin!

J4R1O · Post by **J4R1O** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:27 pm

BTW: Should I change this topic's name?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:44 pm

J4R1O wrote:BTW: Should I change this topic's name?

Let's maybe keep things that are specific to Satin's release in our company forum:

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=390898

J4R1O · Post by **J4R1O** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:48 pm

Urs wrote:
J4R1O wrote:BTW: Should I change this topic's name?
Let's maybe keep things that are specific to Satin's release in our company forum:

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=390898

Roger!

Breeze · Post by **Breeze** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:13 pm

TheoM wrote:The reason I think VTM is now obsolete is because VTM can not emulate satin but satin can do VTM.

Which begs the almost unutterable yet very On-Topic question:

Who's got Satin presets that emulate the Slate VTM?

J4R1O · Post by **J4R1O** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:38 pm

Breeze wrote:
TheoM wrote:The reason I think VTM is now obsolete is because VTM can not emulate satin but satin can do VTM.
Which begs the almost unutterable yet very On-Topic question:

Who's got Satin presets that emulate the Slate VTM?

Fabrice?

Compyfox · Post by **Compyfox** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:27 pm

Nah, ask Steven first.

Either way... I hope that there will be a patch pool for other tape machines like AMPEX, Otari, Tascam, AKAI, Grundig, Revox and Uher!

kylen · Post by **kylen** » Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:29 am

Compyfox wrote:Nah, ask Steven first.

Either way... I hope that there will be a patch pool for other tape machines like AMPEX, Otari, Tascam, AKAI, Grundig, Revox and Uher!

Wouldn't that be fantastic, as well as the original audio the patches were created with for additional context.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:50 am

[DELETED]

u-he Satin or Slate VTM?