KVR Audio

Tubeman · Post by **Tubeman** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:53 am

egbert wrote:
xNiMiNx wrote:
egbert wrote:Just a query on the schematics - is this a circuit you can build or is it the basis of the model only?
The creator used the schematics from here:

http://www.webphix.com/schematic%20heav ... 4mods.html
OK - thanks for the tip. That is an excellent site.

There are lots of mod sites for Marshalls and tube amps in general if you're interested in it.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:09 pm

But I don't understand. If you go through all the trouble to make plugs, it's best to have a way for people to get those, right? I do appreciate ED and others who have done that but ffs, it's the worst I can ever remember

EvilDragon · Post by **EvilDragon** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:36 pm

The guy is poor and obviously can't pay for better hosting. Also seems like connections in Kamchatka suck balls.

hibidy · Post by **hibidy** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:01 pm

Well, I'm sorry to hear that then.

xNiMiNx · Post by **xNiMiNx** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:17 pm

Yeah usually if i visit his site i disable images to speed things up. Maybe the OP could remove direct image links from his site so we arent swamping it

Tubeman · Post by **Tubeman** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:37 pm

EvilDragon wrote:The guy is poor and obviously can't pay for better hosting. Also seems like connections in Kamchatka suck balls.

Dropbox and Google are free why not use them?

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:11 pm

EvilDragon wrote:I have all his Windows x64 VSTs available on my Google Drive (I don't have old cabs, only v3):

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing

Thanks so much for this! Ironically, I was getting a redirect loop in Chrome which prevented me from downloading the files, but it worked fine in IE. I wonder if Google ever tested Google Drive with Chrome (who makes that browser anyway)?

EvilDragon · Post by **EvilDragon** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:14 am

Chrome is Google's browser.

egbert · Post by **egbert** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:18 am

EvilDragon wrote:Chrome is Google's browser.

I have a feeling he knew that.

metalifuxx · Post by **metalifuxx** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:38 am

I am not the developer. I just copied his post from guitarampmodeling and shared it at KVR for you all. He included his images from his site on guitarampmodeling.com

meloco_go · Post by **meloco_go** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:22 am

Tubeman wrote:
EvilDragon wrote:The guy is poor and obviously can't pay for better hosting. Also seems like connections in Kamchatka suck balls.
Dropbox and Google are free why not use them?

AFAIK Dropbox (and likely Google Docs) have a traffic limit. Also, he needs to upload his stuff there. With his slow DL speed I don't think UL is any faster.

Tubeman · Post by **Tubeman** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:04 am

meloco_go wrote:
Tubeman wrote:
EvilDragon wrote:The guy is poor and obviously can't pay for better hosting. Also seems like connections in Kamchatka suck balls.
Dropbox and Google are free why not use them?
AFAIK Dropbox (and likely Google Docs) have a traffic limit. Also, he needs to upload his stuff there. With his slow DL speed I don't think UL is any faster.

I doubt there would be so much traffic for Dropbox to jam. Many people share files that are hundreds of megabytes in size with no problems and the plugins are a few megs tops?

meloco_go · Post by **meloco_go** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:13 am

Tubeman wrote:I doubt there would be so much traffic for Dropbox to jam. Many people share files that are hundreds of megabytes in size with no problems and the plugins are a few megs tops?

But how many times they would be downloaded? If I upload a CD image for my client that would get to be downloaded once it's one thing, but if I put a few plugins each worth of 10Mb, and each get's downloaded a few hundred times?

chokehold · Post by **chokehold** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:29 am

I tried this thing... and though I personally dislike "the Marshall sound" of their real amps, soundwise for A) an emulation of B) a Marshall preamp, it is pretty good sounding.

The downside: here it eats up something like 25% or even more when set to 4x oversampling and when it has to work a little. 2 instances and I have to start freezing tracks... not practical.

Still, very impressive concept!

meloco_go · Post by **meloco_go** » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:52 am

chokehold wrote:I tried this thing... and though I personally dislike "the Marshall sound" of their real amps, soundwise for A) an emulation of B) a Marshall preamp, it is pretty good sounding.

Try Harlequin plugin from the same guy, it's a different thicker tone.

Mercuriall JCM800 Hot Preamp (hot mod version)