D16 updated LuSH-101 to version 1.1.1

[ezelkow1]

For the multicore thing i would think its the same limitations as diva. On my i7 sandy diva usually only uses the physical cores as well. However I remember testing against someone else and it appeared that if you were using windows 8 there was a chance it would actually spread across hyperthreads as well. We had the same processor, same host, same diva version, but windows 8 taskmgr would show all 8 in use while my win7 would only show 4

I think the gui size should be selectable though, this new size might be fine for my desktop, but I think it might be unusable on my laptop

[emergeaudio]

I think the gui size should be selectable though, this new size might be fine for my desktop, but I think it might be unusable on my laptop

It might be a problem. Lush-101 looks beautifully on my 24' screen and I can see all sliders and buttons here - finally, coz the older versions required lenses to adjust any parameter.

It takes about 70% of my screen width (resolution 1920*1200) so not sure if the whole window will be visible on smaller screen.

[Motion]

Great update..thanks!

[SLiC]

A little 'one trick' compared to say Diva

It's only "one trick" if you don't have many tricks...... For instance can DIVA have 8 Arps running at the same time ?

Having said that I do plan to buy DIVA at some point....I've enjoyed the demo versions in the past.

I'm not knocking Lush, its sounds great and their are some nice presents, however, its essentially half a dozen of the same (101) plug in that can be mapped/layered and arped..you can do that with most DAWS (you can certainly do it with Live) - for the same CPU hit you could play a couple of Zebra Arps (simultaneously) with a Diva lead (picking a different sound OSC) etc - I guess its just a case of the convenience of having LUSH in one window/VSTi rather than triggering multiple devices? It is fun, I like the way it sounds, the GUI and the way it layers and Arps- I just think that its a little overpriced.

[Alexiz]

I think the gui size should be selectable though, this new size might be fine for my desktop, but I think it might be unusable on my laptop

I think they mention it on their website that optional sizes are being planned somewhere along the development line...

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[waltercruz]

there's a conf to hide the keyboard, it almost fitted my screen after that.

[Blue-eyed Blonde Ape]

Lush vs Africa, a quick knock off
https://soundcloud.com/blue-eyedblondea ... 101-africa

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[Teksonik]

From the upgrade e-mail:

"Besides, plug-in's GUI has been enlarged due to users' requests giving you better readability and comfortable usage".

[KevWestBeats]

Hi guys,

Just quick info that we've updated LuSH-101 to version 1.1.0, but the most important thing it introduces multi-core support and GUI was rendered in almost HD resolution

Cheers,
Sebastian / D16

Great job on this update. I liked the sound of Lush when it released but the cpu consumption made it a no go for me and really made me dislike the synth. This time it runs great on my system with a few instances going vs struggling to run one before.

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[stimresp]

For instance I believe FL Studio's meter still only shows the first core's activity.

That's where I went wrong.

I measured CPU use now with the Task Manager and it's quite a lot lower than reported by FLstudio. Thanks for the info.

Just hoping now for a re-sizeable GUI. The original size was fine for me personally. I can see how it would be too small for some, but I would like the option to choose.

[bld]

We'll do selection of GUI size asap

Cheers

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]