Well, 50e/365 = 0.13 a day. 0.19 in $. I think i can live with that and allow steinberg to carry on and bring an UPDATED FREEZE IN C8 (hintCompyfox wrote: To me, it is not(!) a reason to update. At least not for 50 EUR. 25EUR would have been more fair. Pity that so less people realize that, budweiser.
Cubase 7.5 official announcement!
-
- KVRian
- 1160 posts since 14 Oct, 2006 from france
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 12094 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from North Wales
I just watched all the promo videos on DV247.com
Its like they have added a cut down version of Maschine (I have Maschine 2), a tape effect (I have Satin) a Turnado or Finger like effects (I have both!) a sample player and loops (I have Komplete 9)...its a great if you haven't been in to VST/VSTi before- they are all good tools for new entrants who haven't got anything else, and I guess that's where they are aiming now- new customers to DAWS, who has the most stuff included?
A great update if you buying your first DAW- anyone who has been doing this for a while will probably have better/go to versions of everything Steiny has added. As for the 'EDM' toolkit....I'm surprised they didn't add a wobble synth
Hopefully 8 will concentrate on recording live instruments and layered linear audio/midi editing, as that is what I use it for (recording guitars etc.), I prefer Live when I am making EDM/IDM type stuff- but I guess if you can only have 1 DAW and make both EDM/Loop based music and linear style recording then some of this stuff is useful?
I really wonder, if they did a poll, how many existing Cubase users want more bundled effects and instruments with their Cubase updates?
Its like they have added a cut down version of Maschine (I have Maschine 2), a tape effect (I have Satin) a Turnado or Finger like effects (I have both!) a sample player and loops (I have Komplete 9)...its a great if you haven't been in to VST/VSTi before- they are all good tools for new entrants who haven't got anything else, and I guess that's where they are aiming now- new customers to DAWS, who has the most stuff included?
A great update if you buying your first DAW- anyone who has been doing this for a while will probably have better/go to versions of everything Steiny has added. As for the 'EDM' toolkit....I'm surprised they didn't add a wobble synth
Hopefully 8 will concentrate on recording live instruments and layered linear audio/midi editing, as that is what I use it for (recording guitars etc.), I prefer Live when I am making EDM/IDM type stuff- but I guess if you can only have 1 DAW and make both EDM/Loop based music and linear style recording then some of this stuff is useful?
I really wonder, if they did a poll, how many existing Cubase users want more bundled effects and instruments with their Cubase updates?
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 20 May, 2006 from canada
Looks like quite a nice update to me, esp. with the QC presets thingee, the track visibility options, and the improved instrument rack. And if they wanna throw in a few new vst's for the ride - that's fine...SB makes some decent plug-ins. Would like to see a bug fix list though...
vespesian (sean)
You're in an amazing state - so stay there.
You're in an amazing state - so stay there.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 508 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
Anyone know if REVelation is true stereo? My current go-to TS algo reverb is VRoom, but I've spent the last few years pruning my external plugin stash and I'm now at a point where if something's already in my DAW (and decent), I'll make it work.
-
- KVRist
- 118 posts since 28 Oct, 2012 from Cork, Ireland
Cubase 5.5 was the first one I bought (migrated from Sonar) and I've to say It's the best DAW I've tried. It offers incredible amount of features, especially MIDI related (events processing) and besides adding new synths and plugins they really update the core of this app.TheoM wrote:+1vespesian wrote:Would like to see a bug fix list though...
I have only one issue: Cubase it's very unstable with third party plugins. Many of them works with Sonar, but not with Cubase
but overall I wouldn't replace Cubase with any other daw
-
- KVRAF
- 3627 posts since 5 Jan, 2006 from UK
Aye, ain't that the truth.
To paraphrase a quote attributed to Churchill; "Cubase is the worst DAW... after all the others that have been tried."
I'm curious to play around with the new 7.5 Instrument tracks and associated multi-out. Still curious about how it actually works.
I assume you add an Instrument track and the VST also appears automatically in the F11 rack?
[edit - Reaper flame baiting removed ]
To paraphrase a quote attributed to Churchill; "Cubase is the worst DAW... after all the others that have been tried."
I'm curious to play around with the new 7.5 Instrument tracks and associated multi-out. Still curious about how it actually works.
I assume you add an Instrument track and the VST also appears automatically in the F11 rack?
[edit - Reaper flame baiting removed ]
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
I see one important feature (for me)... Multi-Out instrument track/rack (seems to be some merging of the old VST rack and instrument tracks)
| Links-
- KVRAF
- 1676 posts since 17 Dec, 2002 from Yorkshire
and this is exactly where steinberg goes with cubase. same as other developers... who apart from focusing on newcomers also try to offer features and innovations to attract and tempt to convert long established cubendo and pro tool user base. due to really tough competition around steinberg's efforts have more to do with catching up rather than taking a lead. cubase software concept was and still is stellar but people who run the steins business sadly lost the plot a bit...SLiC wrote: A great update if you buying your first DAW- anyone who has been doing this for a while will probably have better/go to versions of everything Steiny has added.
Last edited by bronxsound on Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2263 posts since 6 Aug, 2007
This is what is really upsetting about this. Steinberg is already moving in to a paid 7.5 before completely fixing the core of version 7. Now if I want to continue getting bug-fixes for "version 7," I have to pay for this mid-version upgrade, which is just a bunch of stuff I don't want or need.vespesian wrote:Would like to see a bug fix list though...
Very bad business practice. I have no qualms about the idea of paid mid-version upgrades, but at least leave the previous version in a nice robust state before moving on--otherwise, you're leaving the people who don't want to upgrade to the new version with a bunch of bugs that will never be fixed. And really, 7.0 is still pretty young--an upgrade at this point just seems like a money-grab.
I guess I had kind of moved on already, so it doesn't really matter that much to me, but this just seems kind of scummy to me.
-
- KVRAF
- 35672 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Considering almost all of the enhancement of the 7.5 update affect things only available in either Artist or the full version, and the fact that Elements/LE/AI never saw a 6.5 update due to the same reasons i would say never.Compyfox wrote: Furthermore - what about Cubase AI/LE/Elements in terms of 7.5?
When will users see that?
- KVRAF
- 5112 posts since 5 May, 2005 from Stockholm, Sweden
No changes to the nasty mixer then?
Still, it's well worth €50 for those who do use 7. I like the update to Groove Agent. I always found the included drum kits a bit thin sounding though.
Overall I can't see myself upgrading as I already paid for the upgrade to 7 from 6.5 and I don't use it at all.
Still, it's well worth €50 for those who do use 7. I like the update to Groove Agent. I always found the included drum kits a bit thin sounding though.
Overall I can't see myself upgrading as I already paid for the upgrade to 7 from 6.5 and I don't use it at all.
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
How many times do people need to say that there will continue to be bug fixes for version 7.0 - you do not need to pay for this upgrade to get themsockofgold wrote:This is what is really upsetting about this. Steinberg is already moving in to a paid 7.5 before completely fixing the core of version 7. Now if I want to continue getting bug-fixes for "version 7," I have to pay for this mid-version upgrade, which is just a bunch of stuff I don't want or need.vespesian wrote:Would like to see a bug fix list though...
Very bad business practice. I have no qualms about the idea of paid mid-version upgrades, but at least leave the previous version in a nice robust state before moving on--otherwise, you're leaving the people who don't want to upgrade to the new version with a bunch of bugs that will never be fixed. And really, 7.0 is still pretty young--an upgrade at this point just seems like a money-grab.
I guess I had kind of moved on already, so it doesn't really matter that much to me, but this just seems kind of scummy to me.
Exactly how it was when 6.5 came out. Hell Steinberg continue giving bug fixes to previous full versions - so 5 was still getting updates when 6 came out etc.
So where does this rubbish come from ???
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRAF
- 2263 posts since 6 Aug, 2007
Wow, relax! If I made a mistake, I am happy to be wrong in this case. Just take it easy, though--it's going to be okay.ericj23 wrote:So where does this rubbish come from ???
If I'm wrong, then awesome on Steinberg. I didn't realize they did that with version 6.