WHY?!?!osiris wrote:
The real reasons why analog synths are superior to softsynths
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- KVRAF
- 14225 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I love that man. And he makes me laugh so hard I almost choke. I want to remix this!!
- KVRAF
- 18470 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Do I really know it? I was told some of my instruments are analog, but it could be a hoax. One of my synths, a DX200 says it's digital and I like it more than some of the virtual DX emulation synths... so what does that mean?IncarnateX wrote:1. You know they are analog and thereby better pr. definition.
Sure, they do have a "thinginess" to them that software does not have... but what happens when you're controlling them with a plastic MIDI controller and a VST editor?IncarnateX wrote:2. They are often made in more robust materials than plastic, which makes them feel authentic.
If you find plugging your analog synth into an audio and/or MIDI interface complicated, then perhaps you should take up the harmonica.IncarnateX wrote:3. They have real wires and often complicated to set up, which make them feel sophisticated.
I love being a computer nerd, so why do I enjoy analog synths? Often I'll use software editor to program them... my Sub Phatty has barely been touched.IncarnateX wrote:4. Playing them makes you feel like a real musician compared to clicking softsynths with your mouse, which makes you feel like a computer nerd.
Unless you have a Macintosh.IncarnateX wrote:5. They are more beautiful than a PC.
Well, yeah, I guess, except again, software does need to be controlled by something that's 3d.IncarnateX wrote:6. They are three dimensional not two dimensional, which enhance their authenticity.
Have you ever dealt with Audio Damage's customer support!?IncarnateX wrote:7. The fact that you sometimes have to get them repaired enhance their authenticity.
Maybe.IncarnateX wrote:8. They feel more authentic to bring to a jam - or live gig than a PC and a controller.
Well, they are more valuable, especially if you buy used instruments. I bought a used Machinedrum and sold it for exactly what I bought it for after I decided I didn't like it. Oh crap! The Machinedrum is digital?IncarnateX wrote:9. They are much more expensive, which makes them feel more valuable.
I've yet to notice any of my synths having a particular smell to them. Maybe because I live near a bay and the smell of high tide is masking it?IncarnateX wrote:10. They even smell better, especially when they get hot.
11. They have a richer and more nuanced sound. (added that for you)
I still love me a good softsynth but I'll never understand posts like this. They always seem to be like some religious proselytizing based on an inner fear that if you don't spend enough time convincing others your belief system is correct then you'll have time to question it and find out it isn't. When I wasn't sure of the point of owning hardware, I actively sought out proof and found some convincing evidence. It led me to take a small plunge and buy one, only to find out that I did indeed find some sonic benefit to owning even a modestly priced analog synth. If you don't want one, then don't buy one, but why the silly posts like this? Did your parents not pay enough attention to you?
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Wow you are a genius! Congratulations with the first real "serious" answer to my OP. But do yourself a favor and scroll down to the last post here and I promise it will all make sense to youzerocrossing wrote:Do I really know it? I was told some of my instruments are analog, but it could be a hoax. One of my synths, a DX200 says it's digital and I like it more than some of the virtual DX emulation synths... so what does that mean?IncarnateX wrote:1. You know they are analog and thereby better pr. definition.
Sure, they do have a "thinginess" to them that software does not have... but what happens when you're controlling them with a plastic MIDI controller and a VST editor?IncarnateX wrote:2. They are often made in more robust materials than plastic, which makes them feel authentic.
If you find plugging your analog synth into an audio and/or MIDI interface complicated, then perhaps you should take up the harmonica.IncarnateX wrote:3. They have real wires and often complicated to set up, which make them feel sophisticated.
I love being a computer nerd, so why do I enjoy analog synths? Often I'll use software editor to program them... my Sub Phatty has barely been touched.IncarnateX wrote:4. Playing them makes you feel like a real musician compared to clicking softsynths with your mouse, which makes you feel like a computer nerd.
Unless you have a Macintosh.IncarnateX wrote:5. They are more beautiful than a PC.Some of my synths are down right ugly IMO. The Minibrute is not going to win any beauty contests, that's for sure.
Well, yeah, I guess, except again, software does need to be controlled by something that's 3d.IncarnateX wrote:6. They are three dimensional not two dimensional, which enhance their authenticity.
Have you ever dealt with Audio Damage's customer support!?IncarnateX wrote:7. The fact that you sometimes have to get them repaired enhance their authenticity.![]()
Maybe.IncarnateX wrote:8. They feel more authentic to bring to a jam - or live gig than a PC and a controller.
Well, they are more valuable, especially if you buy used instruments. I bought a used Machinedrum and sold it for exactly what I bought it for after I decided I didn't like it. Oh crap! The Machinedrum is digital?IncarnateX wrote:9. They are much more expensive, which makes them feel more valuable.
I've yet to notice any of my synths having a particular smell to them. Maybe because I live near a bay and the smell of high tide is masking it?IncarnateX wrote:10. They even smell better, especially when they get hot.
11. They have a richer and more nuanced sound. (added that for you)
I still love me a good softsynth but I'll never understand posts like this. They always seem to be like some religious proselytizing based on an inner fear that if you don't spend enough time convincing others your belief system is correct then you'll have time to question it and find out it isn't. When I wasn't sure of the point of owning hardware, I actively sought out proof and found some convincing evidence. It led me to take a small plunge and buy one, only to find out that I did indeed find some sonic benefit to owning even a modestly priced analog synth. If you don't want one, then don't buy one, but why the silly posts like this? Did your parents not pay enough attention to you?
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... &start=240
Well maybe not to you after all but give it a try
-
- KVRian
- 626 posts since 25 Jun, 2013
IncarnateX wrote:4. Playing them makes you feel like a real musician compared to clicking softsynths with your mouse, which makes you feel like a computer nerd.
My discussion is: These are the harbingers of real life cyborgs.
We become dependent on a machine that augments our abilities in return.
This dependency is a psychological - and creative - one. We're all very attached to our computers now. They're very much a part of who many of us are now.
Some people won't like this for obvious reasons, and that raises the great debate about becoming too reliant on technology.
The older generations go, "What happens if all the technology fails?"
That's why there is so much redundancy in our infrastructure. It means the chances of widespread failure become very, very small.
Nothing is 100% safe. Not even our bodies.
Once the silicon era is over, we'll have even better computers with even more redundancy.
Eventually, we will become our sequencers.
Musicianship will become a thing of the past, and fortunately, so will all of us.
Transitions happen gradually over time, through multiple generations who become more and more accustomed to the changes.
We are the Borg. Onward, to more Borgdom.
- KVRAF
- 20842 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Modern research shows that they're constantly firing and that our analog and softsynth neural pathways can be firing simultaneously.stonestreet wrote:I have heard that our neurons either fire or they do not.
- KVRian
- 727 posts since 30 May, 2007 from Barkhamsted, CT, USA
Did I mention I love missionary?
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Spot on, but I least I have parents and is not an orphan raised by degenerated monkeys like you arezerocrossing wrote: Did your parents not pay enough attention to you?
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
Pics or it didn't happen ...lionscub68 wrote:Did I mention I love missionary?
... space is the place ...
- KVRAF
- 2041 posts since 15 Aug, 2012 from Australia
- KVRAF
- 5564 posts since 13 Jan, 2005 from the bottom of my heart
are you kidding? thats sergej raskolinkov the ukrainian bob dylan!Sendy wrote:WHY?!?!osiris wrote:
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.
-
fateamenabletochange fateamenabletochange https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8029
- KVRAF
- 3062 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from outer rim
Anyone using a softsynth from 10 years ago ??
Think anyone will be using a contemporary in use today softsynth in 10 years time ??
Maybe the occasional person might have forgotten to come out of their wardrobe with their beloved XP and beloved Synth1 and Oatmeal, but I can't see today's softsynths lasting 10 years, let alone decades more. All confined to dead harddrives in the sky.
Analog lasts. Digital Hardware lasts. Softsynths are disposable.
Think anyone will be using a contemporary in use today softsynth in 10 years time ??
Maybe the occasional person might have forgotten to come out of their wardrobe with their beloved XP and beloved Synth1 and Oatmeal, but I can't see today's softsynths lasting 10 years, let alone decades more. All confined to dead harddrives in the sky.
Analog lasts. Digital Hardware lasts. Softsynths are disposable.
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
Isn't Zebra 10 years old? There are a few good plugins from that time period that are still usabe but 10 years ago the softsynth scene was still in it's infancy. The only reason I possibly won't be using a lot of softsynths in 10 years time is that they're so cheap, compared to hardware, and hence if a newer one comes out that I like more than the old ones, it's not a huge deal to update like it would be for expensive hardware.
Hardware does retain it's value much better, but when it comes to actual making music, and not investing, softsynths are invaluable.
Having a few bits of hardware and lots of software seems to be the way to go for me
Hardware does retain it's value much better, but when it comes to actual making music, and not investing, softsynths are invaluable.
Having a few bits of hardware and lots of software seems to be the way to go for me
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- KVRAF
- 2784 posts since 18 Apr, 2001
How about CM-101, even more then a decade old (made for the KVR One Synth Challenge of a few months ago):fateamenabletochange wrote:Anyone using a softsynth from 10 years ago ??
https://soundcloud.com/gridlock-momentu ... chapter101
CrimsonWarlock aka TechnoGremlin, Moved to Reason and Rack Extensions exclusively (from Reaper and VSTs) several years ago.
