Ah, I guess it's no good judging how popular it really is just by the buzz on the net. A push competitor is an interesting idea.pc999 wrote:It may be popular, but that dont mean there is many owners, I sure would like to have one but it is not cheap, it is recent, and its availability is still somewhat limited for most of the time since release.
Anyway I wouldn't be to surprised if there is similar products on the way (Nektar???) that would love to be the BWS Push...
Did you mean to type "Buttwig?" Live and Bitwig are so similar that to set up push for bitwig would pretty much mean that it would function almost exactly the same; same buttons doing the same operations I think. There should only be minor niggles. I'm about to go through the ableton push tut vids to make sure.beauchamp wrote:Buttwig would be favorite designing and manufacturing their own controller which would be unique in it's own way, I'm sure.
Push is designed specifically as a Live controller, it would be a complete waste of money getting one to use with another DAW. What's the point; there are much better options.
beauchamp
I don't know but I'd imagine making a deal to produce a custom controller makes a lot more sense for a big company like Live than a start up like Bitwig. I'd like to hear why or way not though if anyone feels like shedding light on it.
Ah, thank you for posting that. Someone pmed me that link awhile ago and I completely forgot about it.The Mantra wrote:Push is not locked or encrypted.
You can use user mode to extend Push functionality or use it in another daw.
Someone mentioned Numerology and someone in hibidys Push thread also spoke of using Push in Studio One. Native Kontrol PXT (http://www.nativekontrol.com/PXT-General.html) is an example of how open push is.



