So after about 2.3333.. days of hacking this thing together: IRDust (win vst 32/64 bit)
[edit: currently at version 0.1.0]

[Not final GUI design, just something for testing.]
At this point is largely a test: does it seems worthwhile for further development?
Three operation modes:
- mono-in: essentially "dual mono" with pre-width = 0% but saves some CPU.
- dual mono: process left input with IR1-left, right input with IR1-right
- true stereo: process left input with IR1, right input with IR2
NOTE: The output can be very loud unless normalization is enabled. I might add a limited later, but for now: You have been warned.
The "pre width" and "post width" controls will scale the side-channel before/after the convolution. These and the filters will only have effect on the "wet" signal, dry is pure pass-through with level adjust and latency compensation.
Latency is 128 samples (64 processing + 64 for resampling.. the processing part might go away at some point), processing is done in double precision.
There is an internal "safety" limit of 2 million taps (about 50sec at 44.1kHz), mainly because the double-precision processing uses quite a bit of memory. Anything longer than that will get truncated automatically.
IR must be be a WAV file with mono/stereo (no direct 4-channel yet, sorry). Any typical uncompressed formats should now work. It it refuses to load your files, let me know. Note that while it reports samplerate it doesn't resample anything.(this was fixed at some point)
It might crash and burn, as I obviously have not been able to do very extensive testing, since practically all the code is less than a week old.
The first 512 samples are processed in audio-thread directly, rest is done in background thread (one per instance), so host ASIO meters might not be too useful in estimating when it's going to start causing drop-outs (if the background thread is not ready in time, it will have to wait and the ASIO meter will spike suddenly). I'd like some feedback on how easily that happens, since it's partially a "performance vs. reliablity" trade-off and I could fine-tune is further.
