KVR Audio

dom@bitwig · Post by **dom@bitwig** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:03 pm

... just that any interested VST developer can easiy support our per-note expressions using standard and official midi sysex definitions, even in good old VST 2.4!

garyboozy · Post by **garyboozy** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:05 pm

yowsers

that sounds fantastic cheers dom. gonna see if randy at madrona labs fancies adding that to Aalto... *dribble*

Echoes in the Attic · Post by **Echoes in the Attic** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:10 pm

dom@bitwig wrote:... just that any interested VST developer can easiy support our per-note expressions using standard and official midi sysex definitions, even in good old VST 2.4!

Cool!

But I guess it wouldn't be much use in real-time without polyphonic modulators eh? So there would have to be plfo devices and penvelope devices.

dom@bitwig · Post by **dom@bitwig** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:13 pm

Oh, there's plenty of use! Per note automation editing, Histogram editing, Polyphonic-Aftertouch to Note expressions...

Echoes in the Attic · Post by **Echoes in the Attic** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:16 pm

dom@bitwig wrote:Oh, there's plenty of use! Per note automation editing, Histogram editing, Polyphonic-Aftertouch to Note expressions...

Oh ya I'm sure, but I meant real-time as in playing, not editing afterwards. So for example there would need to be a poly aftertouch modulator right? Unless of course the VST already has it.

dom@bitwig · Post by **dom@bitwig** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:20 pm

For starters, you can turn PA into note expressions already in the control scripts!

zyguli · Post by **zyguli** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:24 pm

dom@bitwig : I don't want to be annoying, but is there something like retrospective record in Bitwig? Or is anything like it planned? It turned out it's the feature I would have missed most from Cubase. I tried different DAWs and was close to switching to Reaper, but after some time I found the lack of retrospective record utterly frustrating, so I abandoned the idea of ditching Cubase.

tooneba · Post by **tooneba** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:25 pm

codec_spurt wrote:
tooneba wrote:
garyboozy wrote:not sitting on the face, ok. but your opinion is pretty skewed/screwed by your dealings with them, no? plus your moan about ableton on the bitwig's own Q&A pages got me riled. just don't start up again. pretty pls.
yea it became look something vendetta and is getting kinda annoying though it had some point at fisrt.

I can feel the needles under your skin.

Thank you for your journalism.

Ism.

Jism.

If it is so bad? Why hang around?

And you spelt 'first' wrong, btw.

Does that hurt your feeling? Sry bro

Ogopogo · Post by **Ogopogo** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:34 pm

zyguli wrote:dom@bitwig : I don't want to be annoying, but is there something like retrospective record in Bitwig? Or is anything like it planned? It turned out it's the feature I would have missed most from Cubase. I tried different DAWs and was close to switching to Reaper, but after some time I found the lack of retrospective record utterly frustrating, so I abandoned the idea of ditching Cubase.

Not dead sure here, but I think you can just assume no. I never heard anything mentioned like that anywhere and its a big enough feature that I'm sure they would have. Also considering that there are notable exceptions from the version 1 feature set I really doubt they would prioritize this for v1 over that stuff like editable crossfades and groups and vst multiout etc.

dom@bitwig · Post by **dom@bitwig** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:55 pm

Ogopogo wrote:
zyguli wrote:dom@bitwig : I don't want to be annoying, but is there something like retrospective record in Bitwig? Or is anything like it planned? It turned out it's the feature I would have missed most from Cubase. I tried different DAWs and was close to switching to Reaper, but after some time I found the lack of retrospective record utterly frustrating, so I abandoned the idea of ditching Cubase.
Not dead sure here, but I think you can just assume no. I never heard anything mentioned like that anywhere and its a big enough feature that I'm sure they would have. Also considering that there are notable exceptions from the version 1 feature set I really doubt they would prioritize this for v1 over that stuff like editable crossfades and groups and vst multiout etc.

Exactly, nothing for 1.0 but something we totally want to add in the future... sometimes the golden take just happens and can't be repeated with the red recording light being on.

kennyda · Post by **kennyda** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:05 pm

bulusglo wrote:Hi,

After doing a "split on onsets", is it possible to drag 'n drop a piece of audio into the drum rack ? (kind of Audio to Midi).

Yes you can. In fact you can slice automatically to the drum rack or multisampler, either at onsets, at a specific beat subdivision, or at audio events (ie one slice per chunk of audio).

kennyda · Post by **kennyda** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:10 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:
kennyda wrote:
whyterabbyt wrote:
kennyda wrote:
whyterabbyt wrote:
kennyda wrote: Putting the Launcher in Arrange View, in the same orientation as the timeline, is a revolutionary stroke of genius
Like Project5 had in 2005?
I didn't know about that. But it's not in the timeline any more in Sonar, why is that?
Was it ever in the timeline in Sonar? I thought it had always been a floating window.

If it was there in Sonar at one point, you'd be better off asking a CW developer why it isnt any longer. Not that that's got much to do with Project5 have it nearly a decade ago, though. I'd hazard a guess and say that its to do with being able to assign any Matrix row to any track, including multiple rows feeding a single track. More flexible that way.
I didn't phrase that clearly, I didn't meant to imply it was ever in Sonar.
Ah. To pointlessly reiterate then, in Sonar its a separate window, with each Matrix row assignable to any track.

So why do you think they changed it when they brought it back? Sees like they lost the plot.

zyguli · Post by **zyguli** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:30 pm

dom@bitwig wrote:
Exactly, nothing for 1.0 but something we totally want to add in the future... sometimes the golden take just happens and can't be repeated with the red recording light being on.

Thank you for your answer. It's good to know that you guys are at least aware of the importance of this feature. :]

codec17 · Post by **codec17** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:35 pm

dom@bitwig wrote:... just that any interested VST developer can easiy support our per-note expressions using standard and official midi sysex definitions, even in good old VST 2.4!

I love it that you guys answer questions.. I hope it will be that way. (i think its impossible these weeks

) but really like it. With other devs its like youre screaming in the dark IMHO.

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:42 pm

codec17 wrote:
dom@bitwig wrote:... just that any interested VST developer can easiy support our per-note expressions using standard and official midi sysex definitions, even in good old VST 2.4!
I love it that you guys answer questions.. I hope it will be that way. (i think its impossible these weeks ) but really like it. With other devs its like youre screaming in the dark IMHO.

exactly thats really nice! Even if it can be quite hard to follow the threads i think ( next to actualy workload ), but it`s something that makes a lot of people happy and loyal i think..

cheers for that and

The All In One Source Bitwig Information & Speculation Thread