Thats strange! Works fine here. Is anybody else having that problem, please let me know and i´ll try to fix it.
lars
Best rhodes samples?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 888 posts since 26 Aug, 2003 from SWEDEN
-
- KVRian
- 532 posts since 1 Mar, 2004 from france
hi everybody
I don't have halion ,kontakt and exsp24 ( expensive for me ) so another version ( sounfont or .SFZ) could be a good solution for me and all other people who can't buy a big sampler.
today, no connection for http://www.precisionsound.net
maybe it's my computer
i will be very interested by the sounfont version.The formats will be HALion, Kontakt nad EXS24 MKII. Maybe we will release a light SoundFont version.
I don't have halion ,kontakt and exsp24 ( expensive for me ) so another version ( sounfont or .SFZ) could be a good solution for me and all other people who can't buy a big sampler.
today, no connection for http://www.precisionsound.net
maybe it's my computer
-
- KVRist
- 216 posts since 10 Jan, 2003
The Scarbee is lighter, and the keys don't stick.clueless wrote:Looks like its Scarbee or the real thing, then!Phaedo wrote:In other words, I'm sorry, but you've got your work cut out for you if you're planning to beat Scarbee.
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753 - KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
Its my experience that most Rhodes sample sets rarely are recorded dry and though I think that Scarbee sounds the best- it sounds too polished compared to my rhodes. Granted my rhodes is not a pristine example, but it is in good tune and I usually record it D.I. It sounds like most rhodes are run through too much phase and have high pass filter to remove all the grit.
For wurlitzers this problem is even worse- Most wurlies seem to be recorded at higher velocities than I am able to mash on the keys with, and end up sounding like dog doo. Wurlies are great for their "bite" and ability to cut through a mix, but they can also play very smoothly at low velocities.
For wurlitzers this problem is even worse- Most wurlies seem to be recorded at higher velocities than I am able to mash on the keys with, and end up sounding like dog doo. Wurlies are great for their "bite" and ability to cut through a mix, but they can also play very smoothly at low velocities.
-
- KVRAF
- 5515 posts since 6 May, 2002
How does Lounge Lizard 2.0 do in your opinion?S_A_P wrote:Its my experience that most Rhodes sample sets rarely are recorded dry and though I think that Scarbee sounds the best- it sounds too polished compared to my rhodes. Granted my rhodes is not a pristine example, but it is in good tune and I usually record it D.I. It sounds like most rhodes are run through too much phase and have high pass filter to remove all the grit.
-
- KVRAF
- 5782 posts since 10 Mar, 2003 from Music Shed #8
Phaedo wrote:The Scarbee is lighter, and the keys don't stick.clueless wrote:Looks like its Scarbee or the real thing, then!Phaedo wrote:In other words, I'm sorry, but you've got your work cut out for you if you're planning to beat Scarbee.
ok, but where can I plug in a wah-wah pedal?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 888 posts since 26 Aug, 2003 from SWEDEN
-
- KVRist
- 172 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Ottawa, Canada
LL2 is nice and fits great in mixes. It is also very versatile and has a nice "modern" sound to it.pheeleep wrote:I am curious how it compares to the non sampled based Lounge Lizard 2. Can someone who perhaps owns both tell me? I own LL2 and am very impressed/happy with it...
On the other hand, the RSP'73 is THE REAL THING.
It has the fantastic feel of a vintage instrument and that particular sound when you hit hard the notes. It is my second favorite instrument after my strat