I hope this does not come across as nit-picking: when minor chords are displayed as lowercase Roman numerals, I think that it is redundant to have the lowercase "m" (or "min") appear after it, since the lowercase Roman numeral by itself already implies that the first interval in the chord's root position is a minor third.
If it is possible, I think Traditional Notation chord naming would look better if the following were the case: minor chords were displayed simply as lowercase Roman numerals; diminished chords were displayed as lowercase Roman numerals followed by a small "o" symbol (the "o" may be centered instead of superscripted, so long as the "o" is smaller than the lowercase Roman numeral); and augmented chords were displayed as uppercase Roman numerals followed by a "+" symbol (the "+" symbol could alternatively be smaller and superscripted). The attached image depicts my suggestions in the black fly-out boxes:
NOTE: I noticed that when I had chosen a IIdim chord from the chord selector, a IImin chord appeared in the master track instead, and it was displayed in red (probably because RC knew it did not fit the scale); I think this may be a bug (see the yellow box in the attached picture above).
