Thanks, I can try to move one to a different folder first. That's worked with other VIs I have.Frantz wrote:It could be difficult because they have the same DLL name. In fact, Tone2 recommends uninstalling ElectraX before installing Electra2.BBFG# wrote: I personally like keeping both in effect if there is a difference in sound between the two.
Tone2 Electra 2
-
- KVRAF
- 9100 posts since 28 Apr, 2013
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 230 posts since 16 Nov, 2012
JRRShop now carries Electra2!
They should have done a black GUI, but if it is open, I'll be straight on it
-
- KVRAF
- 12083 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from North Wales
I just bought it from JJR- good price...
I really didn't need anymore VSTi's, especially as I just bought Bazille, but I was really taken with this (and don't have any Tone2 stuff). What I really like was the workflow (GUI), for whatever reason it really made sense to me and reminded me of my hardware days with little LCD windows (in a good way), the animated waveforms make it easy to visualise what's happening- I have lush 101 and I find this much easier to program.
(Some great little touches- I like the initialise options, more Dev's should do this...)
I really didn't need anymore VSTi's, especially as I just bought Bazille, but I was really taken with this (and don't have any Tone2 stuff). What I really like was the workflow (GUI), for whatever reason it really made sense to me and reminded me of my hardware days with little LCD windows (in a good way), the animated waveforms make it easy to visualise what's happening- I have lush 101 and I find this much easier to program.
(Some great little touches- I like the initialise options, more Dev's should do this...)
X32 Desk, i9 PC, S88MK3, S1, BWS, Live + PUSH 3, Osmose, RedShift 6 Pro3, Tempera, Syntakt, Digitone II, OP1-F, OPXY, Eurorack, TD27 Drums, Guitars, Basses, Amps and of course lots of pedals!
-
- KVRist
- 237 posts since 28 Mar, 2005 from Netherlands
Right, that's what I've been saying all along: the functionality and legibility of the GUI *is* important; the general aesthetic choices are mostly icing. What is most important when buying software is how it sounds and how you can use it to realize your artistic vision.
It's this extreme pickiness I've been seeing on KVR lately that wears thin: ElectraX/2 is and has been a fantastic piece of software. Avoiding it entirely because you hate the way it looks, even though the GUI is quite well laid out and legible, is to me just silly.
VOPM is ugly and only makes sense from the perspective of programming the chip it's supposed to emulate, and, guess what? It does a really good job of doing what it's meant to do. It's really ugly and counterintuitive when you first start to use it, but once you aclimate to the workflow, it's a very strong sound source if you're at all into chiptune type stuff. Very niche, but very useful. It was never finished, and since I've transitioned entirely to 64-bit, I no longer use it. I sure wish someone would pick it back up and finish it, though. The levels had to be boosted and you had to send it SysEx to turn on glide and other key features, but the tough, cutting, highly usable (for me) sound made these frustrations worth it.
So, the KVR princesses are wearing my patience thin lately. We're spoiled for choice, and that being the case, we often lose sight of what's most important for anyone who is serious about making music with the intention to publish: the sound. There is intense competition, particularly in electronic music these days. To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
It's this extreme pickiness I've been seeing on KVR lately that wears thin: ElectraX/2 is and has been a fantastic piece of software. Avoiding it entirely because you hate the way it looks, even though the GUI is quite well laid out and legible, is to me just silly.
VOPM is ugly and only makes sense from the perspective of programming the chip it's supposed to emulate, and, guess what? It does a really good job of doing what it's meant to do. It's really ugly and counterintuitive when you first start to use it, but once you aclimate to the workflow, it's a very strong sound source if you're at all into chiptune type stuff. Very niche, but very useful. It was never finished, and since I've transitioned entirely to 64-bit, I no longer use it. I sure wish someone would pick it back up and finish it, though. The levels had to be boosted and you had to send it SysEx to turn on glide and other key features, but the tough, cutting, highly usable (for me) sound made these frustrations worth it.
So, the KVR princesses are wearing my patience thin lately. We're spoiled for choice, and that being the case, we often lose sight of what's most important for anyone who is serious about making music with the intention to publish: the sound. There is intense competition, particularly in electronic music these days. To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
- KVRAF
- 26931 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Unless there is another synth which also fits ones sonic needs/interests and which has a flat gui... then there is no reason not to pick that one based upon the gui appearance.DrWashington wrote:To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12002 posts since 12 May, 2008
I don't really understand all the backlash about one or two people who don't like the GUI to be honest. From what I can tell, most people really like this GUI. There will always be some people who don't like the look of something. Some people don't like Valhalla plug-in GUIs which is the opposite end of the spectrum. Who cares. There's nothing wrong with the ElectraX GUI as most agree. So what if a coupe people don't like it. It happens.
- KVRAF
- 3642 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
c'mon, all these plugins have their differences. but this is about making music, isn't it? choose a plugin that sounds good to you...and has a GUI you can live with. for me, sylenth1 was that plugin; amazing sound, ugly as hell. but...AMAZING SOUND. so i lived with the GUI. besides, electra2 looks pretty good, and most importantly...is logical, well-defined.pdxindy wrote:Unless there is another synth which also fits ones sonic needs/interests and which has a flat gui... then there is no reason not to pick that one based upon the gui appearance.DrWashington wrote:To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
anyway, it's the MUSIC that matters...
_______________________
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
- KVRAF
- 26931 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
People also care about the visual appearance of their guitars even when it has no influence on the sound... in fact, visual appearance is an important consideration in nearly every aspect of life...fisherKing wrote:c'mon, all these plugins have their differences. but this is about making music, isn't it? choose a plugin that sounds good to you...and has a GUI you can live with. for me, sylenth1 was that plugin; amazing sound, ugly as hell. but...AMAZING SOUND. so i lived with the GUI. besides, electra2 looks pretty good, and most importantly...is logical, well-defined.pdxindy wrote:Unless there is another synth which also fits ones sonic needs/interests and which has a flat gui... then there is no reason not to pick that one based upon the gui appearance.DrWashington wrote:To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
anyway, it's the MUSIC that matters...
-
- KVRAF
- 12083 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from North Wales
@ JRRShop
I just bought Electra 2 from you guys but when I registered the serial number you sent it was for ElectraX. as was the download?!
I just bought Electra 2 from you guys but when I registered the serial number you sent it was for ElectraX. as was the download?!
X32 Desk, i9 PC, S88MK3, S1, BWS, Live + PUSH 3, Osmose, RedShift 6 Pro3, Tempera, Syntakt, Digitone II, OP1-F, OPXY, Eurorack, TD27 Drums, Guitars, Basses, Amps and of course lots of pedals!
- KVRAF
- 3642 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
big difference. the AUDIENCE sees your guitar, but who's looking at a plugin at a show? the audience sees a glowing apple...pdxindy wrote:People also care about the visual appearance of their guitars even when it has no influence on the sound... in fact, visual appearance is an important consideration in nearly every aspect of life...fisherKing wrote:c'mon, all these plugins have their differences. but this is about making music, isn't it? choose a plugin that sounds good to you...and has a GUI you can live with. for me, sylenth1 was that plugin; amazing sound, ugly as hell. but...AMAZING SOUND. so i lived with the GUI. besides, electra2 looks pretty good, and most importantly...is logical, well-defined.pdxindy wrote:Unless there is another synth which also fits ones sonic needs/interests and which has a flat gui... then there is no reason not to pick that one based upon the gui appearance.DrWashington wrote:To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
anyway, it's the MUSIC that matters...
i care about the GUIs, but that didn't stop me from using sylenth1 (to be fair, it was ugly, but LOGICAL). and the GUI in electra2 is NOT ugly, and is logical (and, in fact, an improvement over electraX...)
_______________________
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
-
- KVRAF
- 5666 posts since 23 Mar, 2006 from pendeLondonmonium
I'm one of those who really liked the overall design of the original ElectraX. I found all the eye candy graphics somehow pleasing. The way ElectraX illuminated a dark room was like lying in bed with a cup of hot chocolate on a cold winter's day.
Is there an option to get back the original ElectraX GUI colour scheme?
Perhaps the only issue I experienced in the past was with the slow response of the graphics, which I understand has been improved since.
In anycase, ElectraX (and now Electra) is a superb synth. Some of the textures this thing is capable of are amazing.
Is there an option to get back the original ElectraX GUI colour scheme?
Perhaps the only issue I experienced in the past was with the slow response of the graphics, which I understand has been improved since.
In anycase, ElectraX (and now Electra) is a superb synth. Some of the textures this thing is capable of are amazing.
- KVRAF
- 26931 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Lots of people never perform with their guitar in front of an audience... they still care what it looks like.fisherKing wrote:big difference. the AUDIENCE sees your guitar, but who's looking at a plugin at a show? the audience sees a glowing apple...pdxindy wrote:People also care about the visual appearance of their guitars even when it has no influence on the sound... in fact, visual appearance is an important consideration in nearly every aspect of life...fisherKing wrote:c'mon, all these plugins have their differences. but this is about making music, isn't it? choose a plugin that sounds good to you...and has a GUI you can live with. for me, sylenth1 was that plugin; amazing sound, ugly as hell. but...AMAZING SOUND. so i lived with the GUI. besides, electra2 looks pretty good, and most importantly...is logical, well-defined.pdxindy wrote:Unless there is another synth which also fits ones sonic needs/interests and which has a flat gui... then there is no reason not to pick that one based upon the gui appearance.DrWashington wrote:To eschew a particular synthesizer because you detest rendered GUIs, for example, even if it would do just what you want and sound just the way it needs to, is utterly asinine in my opinion.
anyway, it's the MUSIC that matters...
i care about the GUIs, but that didn't stop me from using sylenth1 (to be fair, it was ugly, but LOGICAL). and the GUI in electra2 is NOT ugly, and is logical (and, in fact, an improvement over electraX...)
Anyway, you are free to decide however you like... DrW was basically saying anyone who cared about the gui appearance is an idiot... I was disagreeing... I also stated in a previous post that I think Electra2 is the best Tone2 gui yet (though I personally would still get rid of the glow-y lights) cause it is a bit more plain which I like.
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Haven't i alreeady mentioned that Electra 2 is skinable? It just works differently now, more like with Rayblaster and Nemesis.
Anyway i like te current GUI of Electra 2 and prefer it over that from ElectraX. More clean and easier on the eyes.
Ingo
Anyway i like te current GUI of Electra 2 and prefer it over that from ElectraX. More clean and easier on the eyes.
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 5772 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
"the audience sees a glowing apple"
do you work for mac?
They just look at the person on stage not at the gear, could probably care less if mac or win 
do you work for mac?
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
- KVRAF
- 3642 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
not to be taken seriously. my point was...the audience sees a performer, a laptop, a keyboard company logo...whatever. but they are NOT involved with the GUI of a daw, a plugin...anything.mysticvibes wrote:"the audience sees a glowing apple"
do you work for mac?They just look at the person on stage not at the gear, could probably care less if mac or win
_______________________
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
https://upstatebrooklyn.com
