KVR Audio

arkmabat · Post by **arkmabat** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:22 pm

MeldaProduction wrote:We are doomed

Just roll a 12 sided die.

audientronic · Post by **audientronic** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:49 pm

Ignore us all

.

Just MAgine.

CableChannel · Post by **CableChannel** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:55 pm

MDoomed! ?

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:56 pm

... I'm going to listen to you and lie down

NightofNi · Post by **NightofNi** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:04 pm

audientronic wrote:Just MAgine.

Love that one!

BlackWinny · Post by **BlackWinny** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:42 pm

And please, do not make the GUI... Minuscule !

Make a GUI really... MegaSized!

GHOST19 · Post by **GHOST19** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:10 am

I feel MMotion for this new synth.

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:19 am

MMigraine

Frantz · Post by **Frantz** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:29 am

Majestic <-- a serious suggestion

Touch The Universe · Post by **Touch The Universe** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:47 am

Frantz wrote:Majestic <-- a serious suggestion

already suggested it in first poll

Frantz · Post by **Frantz** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:58 am

mysticvibes wrote:
Frantz wrote:Majestic <-- a serious suggestion
already suggested it in first poll

MMorePollsThanICanFollow

goldglob · Post by **goldglob** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 1:03 am

It's 3.00 am where Vojtech is dreaming.

NightofNi · Post by **NightofNi** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:17 am

Magnificence or Meldastic

(Sorry I know it's decided to be Monster or something like that, I'm just on a roll

)

Breeze · Post by **Breeze** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 5:32 am

goldglob wrote:I'm still for MSynth..timeless...

So am I. But honestly, the name doesn't really matter. What matters is how it sounds, the range of its textural flexibility, the logic and clarity of its workflow, the fine granularity and usability of its control parameters, the externalization of its control mechanisms and its integration into a DAW. It could be called M#$LJIZKR!(* for all I care, although MSynth is still my favorite.

I tried to move things along with the voting because it seemed to come down to a choice between MSynthMonster and MMonsterSynth. I'm very eager to try the beast and hope it lives up to the monster moniker.

But the idea that a qualifier could be used with it would make future synths easy to name by changing the qualifier. This makes MSynth-Monster better to me than MSynthMonster or MMonsterSynth, but without the hyphen, MMonsterSynth just looks and sounds better. But its odd to qualify a first synth out of the gate "Monster"; it must appeal to Vojtech because it's likely that it's in the Melda style of including an unusual amount of flexibility and complexity under hood. Maybe terms that suggest complexity like Hydra, Complex, Labyrinth, Code, Grid, etc, would be better addons, but then this is almost a generic observation about the "Melda" way of doing things. MSynth on its own does also lend it self well to future versions with simple numerical incrementing.

I'm still of the opinion that it's a crap shoot to find a name for a synth without knowing its sound or the details of its operation; it's why MSynth appealed to me in the first place: it's generic, open-ended, simple, fits into the Melda naming MO, and in its simple way, humble and memorable.

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:18 am

Ok, guys, so most of your arguments DO make sense, yet they are often contradicting . So to speed things up, it's time to make a decision. So, it will most likely be MMonsterSynth! I like it. It's a monster, which it is, and it is a synth, so the classical MeldaProduction paradigm holds.

Now back the last stages of development, so you can see the best in a few days!

KVR Audio

Poll: Let's choose a name for MeldaProduction's new synth, last round :)...

Which one?