Codex vs Serum
-
- KVRist
- 361 posts since 14 Jan, 2014 from Germany
The DRM and Codex being a Waves product kill any interest I may have had. I've only demoed Serum, but it sounded fantastic to me and has a stunning, gorgeous, and above all: very usable GUI. If not for financial limitations this month (just bought Bazille), I'd definitely have snatched up Serum -- and still might, if only to support Steve, who seems genuinely personable and down to earth.
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
Yes this synth has it's own "warm" sound. Sound a bit like some sort of pre-filtering (it's the same with the other Waves synth "Element"). "Element" was not developed by Waves, the guy behind this synth wrote here the time it was released. Maybe Codex is also developed by the same guy.Vortex wrote:Well i had a chance to really listen to Codex and so far it seems to have a sort of warm sound to it which some might really like. I'm guessing that waves might be using the same technology that they used in their metafilter product for this?
| Links- KVRAF
- 7691 posts since 11 Jun, 2006
i guess i'll be sticking to the real analog filters on my AX80blackflag wrote:The filters just don't sound very good to me in either synth, I guess I will be sticking with Zebra and Dune2.
https://soundcloud.com/layzerkvr/blackmonday
HW SYNTHS [KORG T2EX - AKAI AX80 - YAMAHA SY77 - ENSONIQ VFX]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
-
- KVRian
- 963 posts since 29 Sep, 2006
Both synths have something to offer.
Serum has more capacity and better sound.
Really, they sound very different, despite using wavetables, they really don't sound very similar.
Codex does have the ARP so thats a big plus.
Serum has more capacity and better sound.
Really, they sound very different, despite using wavetables, they really don't sound very similar.
Codex does have the ARP so thats a big plus.
--After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music.
-Aldous Huxley
-Aldous Huxley
- KVRist
- 340 posts since 18 Sep, 2013
Didn't know that, thanks for the tip!Hadrondrift wrote:Do you know SAVIHost? A cool and free application. It's a very very small VST-Host that creates a pseudo-standalone version of every VST plugin.Novalis wrote:
-
- KVRAF
- 1944 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
Codex sounds incredibly ordinary, its not bad or terrible just ordinary, also Serum divides the wavetables into 256 slices where as Codex is 64 from what I can see. They really couldn't be more different sounding, to say they are similar is like saying a Minimoog is similar to a CS80 because they are both analogue. They both have demoes check them out.
Mac Studio M4
15.7.3
Cubase 15, Ableton Live 12
15.7.3
Cubase 15, Ableton Live 12
-
UltimateOutsider UltimateOutsider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=216800
- KVRian
- 824 posts since 5 Oct, 2009 from Portland, OR
Of course Waves caps how much a given voucher applies to a purchase. The $50 voucher can't exceed 25% the value of a single plugin purchase or 50% of a bundle purchase. Anyway, this means it was really a $25 voucher if you were planning to use it for Codex.
You can get the code here. It's only good for today: http://waves.com/easpecials
And of course after I put in my order at the $75 price I came to KVR and found this link that potentially gives you an additional 10% off. It was too late for me so I didn't try it, but maybe not too late for you guys.
You can get the code here. It's only good for today: http://waves.com/easpecials
And of course after I put in my order at the $75 price I came to KVR and found this link that potentially gives you an additional 10% off. It was too late for me so I didn't try it, but maybe not too late for you guys.
- Banned
- 1181 posts since 24 Jun, 2014 from Giza Plateau
Code have a limit of one per order.And of course after I put in my order at the $75 price I came to KVR and found this link that potentially gives you an additional 10% off. It was too late for me so I didn't try it, but maybe not too late for you guys.
║▌║█║▌│║▌║▌█
- KVRian
- 993 posts since 26 Sep, 2013 from The Frozen North
I was all set to buy Codex at $50. Bummer about the discount limit. In the grand scheme of things, $25 is a small amount compared to how much I've already spent on plugins .. but I've yet to buy anything from Waves and have avoided them for a reason. Think I'll save that $75 and put it towards Serum. =]
Edit: So much for that plan.
Bought, thanks to wavesuniverse!
Edit: So much for that plan.
Last edited by Naenyn on Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 2874 posts since 22 Oct, 2002 from "somewhere between digital and analog"
Er, I've tried both... and admittedly Waves put a bunch of analog type sounds in codex for (not sure why) filler. But Serum just has that slick pro look and quality and each sound in the demo is well... a little different. Steve has pretty good ears when it comes to cool. I'll take Serum even though Codex is cheaper.

- KVRAF
- 18345 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Ah, that $50 voucher is only good up to 25% off, so unless you're buying something else from Waves, Codex will set you back $74.25 USD. But it is for sure worth that... I put it up next to a number of other wavetable plug ins, including Serum, and here's my conclusion. It doesn't do anything wavetable wise that other synths don't already do. It doesn't even have a large complement of things it does do, but it sounds very good when it's doing what it's doing. Codex succeeds in providing a very warm and (I'm gonna say it!
) phat sound that Serum (and the other wavetable software synths I own) does not have. What Codex lacks in filter types it makes up for with useful filters that sound really, really good to me. Very analog sounding compared to Serum's precise digital sounding filters. It's clear Waves flexed it's hardware modeling muscles here. Codex sounds like it's got high quality analog output circuits. Serum sounds like pure software.
Now, don't let this get taken as I think Codex sounds better, or better at all in an overall sense. There are definitely types of sounds I would go straight to Codex for. Simpler types of wavetable stuff and warm phat sounding basses. Serum's wide array of features and "colder" sound strike me as something I'd use when I'm after a very digital sounding synthesizer. Serum's overall sound strikes me more in the realm of Massive in that way. Two different flavors, both worth having.
Another place Codex excels, IMO, is it's presets. Most of Codex's presets are either good to go, or great starting places for something new. Serum's patches are overall not what I like, but it could be because they're targeting a different audience. I'd recommend they hire a big gun like Doc T who poops out great sounding wavetable patches before his first cup of coffee to get in there and create a bunch of content for the factory bank.
So, I bought it Codex. Decent deal for a synth of it's caliber IMO. I'm going to buy Serum too. I think the "vs." question is kind of moot considering how different these two instruments sound. I do have a feeling that I'll probably use Codex a bit more, though I do admit I wish it had a lot more slots in it's mod matrix and a third (and maybe fourth?) osc. I could also go for some more control over the chorus and reverb, but I'm happy they at least included good sounding versions of both. Here's another place Serum could use some polish. I thought it's reverb was especially bad sounding.
Now, don't let this get taken as I think Codex sounds better, or better at all in an overall sense. There are definitely types of sounds I would go straight to Codex for. Simpler types of wavetable stuff and warm phat sounding basses. Serum's wide array of features and "colder" sound strike me as something I'd use when I'm after a very digital sounding synthesizer. Serum's overall sound strikes me more in the realm of Massive in that way. Two different flavors, both worth having.
Another place Codex excels, IMO, is it's presets. Most of Codex's presets are either good to go, or great starting places for something new. Serum's patches are overall not what I like, but it could be because they're targeting a different audience. I'd recommend they hire a big gun like Doc T who poops out great sounding wavetable patches before his first cup of coffee to get in there and create a bunch of content for the factory bank.
So, I bought it Codex. Decent deal for a synth of it's caliber IMO. I'm going to buy Serum too. I think the "vs." question is kind of moot considering how different these two instruments sound. I do have a feeling that I'll probably use Codex a bit more, though I do admit I wish it had a lot more slots in it's mod matrix and a third (and maybe fourth?) osc. I could also go for some more control over the chorus and reverb, but I'm happy they at least included good sounding versions of both. Here's another place Serum could use some polish. I thought it's reverb was especially bad sounding.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Presets are just awesome for someone like me. They inspire me. Already wrote a small piece. Sure, it's presets arranged in C (sorry originality policezerocrossing wrote:Ah, that $50 voucher is only good up to 25% off, so unless you're buying something else from Waves, Codex will set you back $74.25 USD. But it is for sure worth that... I put it up next to a number of other wavetable plug ins, including Serum, and here's my conclusion. It doesn't do anything wavetable wise that other synths don't already do. It doesn't even have a large complement of things it does do, but it sounds very good when it's doing what it's doing. Codex succeeds in providing a very warm and (I'm gonna say it!) phat sound that Serum (and the other wavetable software synths I own) does not have. What Codex lacks in filter types it makes up for with useful filters that sound really, really good to me. Very analog sounding compared to Serum's precise digital sounding filters. It's clear Waves flexed it's hardware modeling muscles here. Codex sounds like it's got high quality analog output circuits. Serum sounds like pure software.
Now, don't let this get taken as I think Codex sounds better, or better at all in an overall sense. There are definitely types of sounds I would go straight to Codex for. Simpler types of wavetable stuff and warm phat sounding basses. Serum's wide array of features and "colder" sound strike me as something I'd use when I'm after a very digital sounding synthesizer. Serum's overall sound strikes me more in the realm of Massive in that way. Two different flavors, both worth having.
Another place Codex excels, IMO, is it's presets. Most of Codex's presets are either good to go, or great starting places for something new. Serum's patches are overall not what I like, but it could be because they're targeting a different audience. I'd recommend they hire a big gun like Doc T who poops out great sounding wavetable patches before his first cup of coffee to get in there and create a bunch of content for the factory bank.
So, I bought it Codex. Decent deal for a synth of it's caliber IMO. I'm going to buy Serum too. I think the "vs." question is kind of moot considering how different these two instruments sound. I do have a feeling that I'll probably use Codex a bit more, though I do admit I wish it had a lot more slots in it's mod matrix and a third (and maybe fourth?) osc. I could also go for some more control over the chorus and reverb, but I'm happy they at least included good sounding versions of both. Here's another place Serum could use some polish. I thought it's reverb was especially bad sounding.

