The VCOa seem to be a CEM 3374 Dual Voltage Controlled Oscillator circuit:
http://www.synthtech.com/cem/c3374pdf.pdf
Oops. Looks like you just found the same...Numanoid wrote:The manual:
http://www.cem3374.com/docs/Manuals/Obe ... x12_OM.pdf
Oops. Looks like you just found the same...Numanoid wrote:The manual:
http://www.cem3374.com/docs/Manuals/Obe ... x12_OM.pdf
For me too, it was the low end that didn't seem right. When I added the effect (whether or not it was incorrect of me to do so) I liked the sound better. At any rate, I do not have a real Matrix 12 or an Xpander sitting next to me, so yes, it was just my impression. Or my perception. I was not talking about putting a compressor on a Matrix 1000 to make it sound like a Matrix 12. I'm not sure where that came from. I did say, however, that the sound of the Matrix 12V reminded me more of the way a Matrix 1000 sounds as opposed to the way I remember a Matrix 12 or Xpander sounding. YMMV.ghettosynth wrote:I would say that you are firmly into the realm of perception there. It's not clear to me that adding some distortion/saturation would make a Matrix 1k sound like a Matrix12. If we're just talking about the core components and consider only the lowpass filter of the Matrix 12, then the two synths are remarkably similar past the oscillators. The differences are fundamental and in two areas, 1) complexity, 2) analog oscillators. A tube compressor is not going to make DCOs sound like VCOs. The only thing that will make a plugin sound like it has VCOs is good modeling of the oscillators.Sequent wrote:I haven't had a chance to try the Solina yet, but I did play around with the Matrix 12 V a bit. I agree with Ingo...
Out of the box, my first impressions of the sound were not super favorable. It was perhaps more reminiscent of a Matrix 1000 than a Matrix 12/Xpander... BUT after putting some "tube" compression in the chain it had a little more of the "punch" that I was looking for. It definitely merits more detailed exploration.
Well, I'm sure that adding effects will change the sound, no doubt about that.Ingonator wrote: For me it was the low end that was lacking in the plugin so adding saturation and an EQ solved it for me, independent on how close the synth sounds compared to the real thing.
I'm not sure what that has to do with the price of tea in china. It did, but they are multiplexed and sampled, you could add those kinds of inputs to any synth, even one with DCOs. This is a great example of how features don't tell you much about technology. They don't, by themselves, tell you that the M12 synth is a VCO based synth. Like much of the M12, they are very dependent on software.The Xpander even seemed to include CV-inputs.
You stated specifically that your impression of the synth without effects was that of the M1k, and with effects was that of the M12. We are both talking about the sounds of a synths and you are using classic analogs as your basis of comparison. Either you mean that somewhat literally, or, like much of the discussion in these kinds of threads, your input isn't particularly informative. That is, either you are talking about THE SOUND of the M1k and the M12, or you are talking about some perception that you have that no one else can reference because it's in your head.Sequent wrote:ghettosynth wrote:I was not talking about putting a compressor on a Matrix 1000 to make it sound like a Matrix 12. I'm not sure where that came from. I did say, however, that the sound of the Matrix 12V reminded me more of the way a Matrix 1000 sounds as opposed to the way I remember a Matrix 12 or Xpander sounding. YMMV.Sequent wrote:I haven't had a chance to try the Solina yet, but I did play around with the Matrix 12 V a bit. I agree with Ingo...
Out of the box, my first impressions of the sound were not super favorable. It was perhaps more reminiscent of a Matrix 1000 than a Matrix 12/Xpander... BUT after putting some "tube" compression in the chain it had a little more of the "punch" that I was looking for. It definitely merits more detailed exploration.
WTF, is this some kind of blind test Pepsi challenge ?ghettosynth wrote:You stated specifically that your impression of the synth without effects was that of the M1k, and with effects was that of the M12. We are both talking about the sounds of a synths and you are using classic analogs as your basis of comparison. Either you mean that somewhat literally, or, like much of the discussion in these kinds of threads, your input isn't particularly informative.
It's sounding like that, lol. Though it could be all in my head, so please don't pay attention to me... my input isn't partiularly informative.Numanoid wrote:WTF, is this some kind of blind test Pepsi challenge ?ghettosynth wrote:You stated specifically that your impression of the synth without effects was that of the M1k, and with effects was that of the M12. We are both talking about the sounds of a synths and you are using classic analogs as your basis of comparison. Either you mean that somewhat literally, or, like much of the discussion in these kinds of threads, your input isn't particularly informative.
Matrix 12 vs Matrix 12V (the choice of a new generation)
It's a discussion about synthesizers. In particular, it seems to be a discussion about ACCURACY in emulation. I don't think that it's unreasonable to expect some ACCURACY in language during such a discussion.Numanoid wrote: WTF, is this some kind of blind test Pepsi challenge ?
Perhaps my English isn't correct or something. When I tried the Matrix 12V the sound did not remind me so much of a Matrix 12 or Xpander but more of a Matrix 1000. I don't believe that any of the hardware synths I mentioned have effects built in. When I put some virtual "tube" compression on the Matrix 12V my impression was that the sound was better. So I agreed with what Ingo had said. I didn't think that perhaps putting the effect on the Matrix 2V was something wrong to do.ghettosynth wrote:You stated specifically that your impression of the synth without effects was that of the M1k, and with effects was that of the M12. We are both talking about the sounds of a synths and you are using classic analogs as your basis of comparison. Either you mean that somewhat literally, or, like much of the discussion in these kinds of threads, your input isn't particularly informative. That is, either you are talking about THE SOUND of the M1k and the M12, or you are talking about some perception that you have that no one else can reference because it's in your head.Sequent wrote:ghettosynth wrote:I was not talking about putting a compressor on a Matrix 1000 to make it sound like a Matrix 12. I'm not sure where that came from. I did say, however, that the sound of the Matrix 12V reminded me more of the way a Matrix 1000 sounds as opposed to the way I remember a Matrix 12 or Xpander sounding. YMMV.Sequent wrote:I haven't had a chance to try the Solina yet, but I did play around with the Matrix 12 V a bit. I agree with Ingo...
Out of the box, my first impressions of the sound were not super favorable. It was perhaps more reminiscent of a Matrix 1000 than a Matrix 12/Xpander... BUT after putting some "tube" compression in the chain it had a little more of the "punch" that I was looking for. It definitely merits more detailed exploration.
rustman wrote:I'm hoping for an upgrade price for the V Collection 4 from 3. So far, I don't see a path listed. We'll see...
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026