KVR Audio

layzer · Post by **layzer** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:12 am

Kriminal wrote:Why are ppl bitching about xp not being supported? Its not even supported by microsoft. Get over it, move on.

XP is still considered a great DAW platform no matter what you say about it, move on.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:21 am

layzer wrote:
Kriminal wrote:Why are ppl bitching about xp not being supported? Its not even supported by microsoft. Get over it, move on.
XP is still considered a great DAW platform no matter what you say about it, move on.

So was win98.... do you expect companies to support that too?

Like i said, get over it, move on. Its 2014.

VariKusBrainZ · Post by **VariKusBrainZ** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:55 am

layzer wrote:
Kriminal wrote:Why are ppl bitching about xp not being supported? Its not even supported by microsoft. Get over it, move on.
XP is still considered a great DAW platform no matter what you say about it, move on.

But not supported, like all those previous Mac OS

Have some really old software that was broken on XP and is working again now

layzer · Post by **layzer** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:56 am

Kriminal wrote:
layzer wrote:
Kriminal wrote:Why are ppl bitching about xp not being supported? Its not even supported by microsoft. Get over it, move on.
XP is still considered a great DAW platform no matter what you say about it, move on.
So was win98.... do you expect companies to support that too?

Like i said, get over it, move on. Its 2014.

win2000, me, win98, 95, 3,1 were all buggy. XP is when they finally got it right.
7 and on are just bloated versions of XP. the person that decided to exclude XP at arturia probably shares your mentality and should be fired....and who cares what year it is... cars built 50 years ago are better than the
plastic garbage being made now.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:06 am

Yeah, you're missing the point.

Good luck living in the past....

stardustmedia · Post by **stardustmedia** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:10 am

Kriminal wrote:Yeah, you're missing the point.

Good luck living in the past....

Good one...

I don't understand, how someone can complain about installation on XP, when minimum is Win7??? But please

me to understand

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:12 am

I cant get any of these synths to install on Workbench on my A1200. WTF?

Arturia need to sack somebody!!!

Im strill driving a Ford Anglia, why cant i get spare parts off the shelf? Ford need to sack someone!!!!

deastman · Post by **deastman** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:25 am

Kriminal wrote:I cant get any of these synths to install on Workbench on my A1200. WTF?

Arturia need to sack somebody!!!

Im strill driving a Ford Anglia, why cant i get spare parts off the shelf? Ford need to sack someone!!!!

But do they run under Apple DOS 3.3?

layzer · Post by **layzer** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:27 am

Kriminal wrote:I cant get any of these synths to install on Workbench on my A1200. WTF?

Arturia need to sack somebody!!!

Im strill driving a Ford Anglia, why cant i get spare parts off the shelf? Ford need to sack someone!!!!

like i said....no matter what you or anyone else says about it.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:35 am

...are you going to finish that sentence?

EvilDragon · Post by **EvilDragon** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:36 am

layzer wrote:7 and on are just bloated versions of XP.

W7 is working much better and faster than XP ever did. It's not bloated, it's just better.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:46 am

EvilDragon wrote:
layzer wrote:7 and on are just bloated versions of XP.
W7 is working much better and faster than XP ever did. It's not bloated, it's just better.

+1000

fmr · Post by **fmr** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:50 am

And na entire page discussing the merits/demerits of XP and 7, instead of the synths

BTW, after all the bitching about the quality of the V versus the real one, only based on YT comparisons and memories, does anyone around here ACTUALLY have access to a real Matrix-12 to try to record real life comparisons of the same patch performed by the two?

I may be able to still get access to one in my former college (assuming it is still working, which I have to check first).

stardustmedia · Post by **stardustmedia** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:52 am

Can anybody help me to get the ASC running from my 1541? Tried it with

OPEN 1,8,15,"N0:arturia.dmg, ID":
COPY <ASC_Installer_MacOS10.9.%>=<C64//C:1541/root>
LOAD 1,8,15,"arturia.dmg, ID" .. INSTALLPATH 2,6,14,"/home/arturia/%MSDOS3.1"
CLOSE 1

Can it be that they won't run on the DOS-emulation on my C64??? Sack'em Arturia

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:58 am

fmr wrote:And na entire page discussing the merits/demerits of XP and 7, instead of the synths

BTW, after all the bitching about the quality of the V versus the real one, only based on YT comparisons and memories, does anyone around here ACTUALLY have access to a real Matrix-12 to try to record real life comparisons of the same patch performed by the two?

I may be able to still get access to one in my former college (assuming it is still working, which I have to check first).

I think ghettosynth had one....

Arturia's new plugins : Solina V and Matrix 12V