In Junetober 134 KC. Thank you, I like the hat. Milk anyone?stratman wrote:Hm, ok, this thread got me a little confused.
So, ..., just to make it clear, when is Oskafield going to release the Buzz version of Fruity Bells again ?
/Majken
In Junetober 134 KC. Thank you, I like the hat. Milk anyone?stratman wrote:Hm, ok, this thread got me a little confused.
So, ..., just to make it clear, when is Oskafield going to release the Buzz version of Fruity Bells again ?
We did and it 'worked' (Well, the 'Oskari' way of working that is : When we asked why machine V, W, X, Y, Z, ... weren't working he replied that 'the wrappers didn't support machines that used wave tables'. Case closed).Majken wrote:Well you should have made sure it was properly working in the current FL when you bought it.
Of course : We should have sued, dumped the whole buzz idea and asked our money back the moment we noticed half of the machines weren't working AND ... but we didn't (and probably never will) have time for that kinda stuff.Majken wrote:You should also have checked up how to make future updates to the wrappers to improve performance/machine support and so on.
Because we don't have time to do EVERYTHING ourselves and who better than 'the author' himself could have done a better job ?Majken wrote:Why did you not just buy the license for adding buzz support and use the sdk to backtrack adding buzz support by coding the wrappers yourselves?
Please don't turn things around here : We politely *asked* if Oskari *wanted* to do the wrappers and we *paid* him a lot to do so, hoping tons of new machines would be made now that the whole thing got 'back to life'.Majken wrote:From your posts it seems you're happily waiting forr Buzz to roll over and die. Again, this is not a professional attitude.
We didn't pay anything for those machines (half of them don't work in the wrappers anyway). We paid a lot of money for badly coded wrappers.Majken wrote:Somewhat ironic too considering you paid a "fortune" for those machines.
Don't worry about that : Image-Line is made of hard working and very capable developers (just download and check out the demo).Majken wrote:now i now what Image-Line are made of.
Exactly, the machine developers never saw any money. However their machines were attractive enough for you to pay money for. Obviously this made some people sad, angry and disappointed.We didn't pay anything for those machines (half of them don't work in the wrappers anyway). We paid a lot of money for badly coded wrappers.
catch that goblin!!!bluedad wrote:who is this Skaven guy?
CreepJoint wrote:This is really sad, I fail to understand why people seem to have less tolerance towards Image Line than,say, Dictator Bush
Well. There are two ways to respond :Majken wrote:Exactly, the machine developers never saw any money. Obviously this made some people sad, angry and disappointed.
I was interested in the fact that there were a lot of machines & FX available. I can't say any of the machines real jumped out of it.Majken wrote:However their machines were attractive enough for you to pay money for.
Guess you didn't follow the initial 'riot' on Buzzmachines.com then ...Majken wrote:please do not discredit the Buzz community. They never did you any harm
Yeah, all the anti-Gol protests have been hard to take, but once I saw that brilliant film 'Fruityloops 9/11' it was a done deal.CreepJoint wrote:This is really sad, I fail to understand why people seem to have less tolerance towards Image Line than,say, Dictator Bush
not true: WE advised buzz machine authors to set up a flag so that their machine don't run in FL. Instead, some threatened of making their machine detect FL and delete the user's stuff.I think he started coding some protection in them so they wouldn't run in FL
You sure do.topaz wrote:shit sticks.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026