Camel Audio ceasing sales? [Update: CA acquired by Apple]

[wagtunes]

Alchemy is now officially dead with the latest Omnisphere update. Nobody will give a crap anymore.

Maybe THAT'S why they went out of business.

[Numanoid]

Alchemy is now officially dead with the latest Omnisphere update. Nobody will give a crap anymore.

Maybe THAT'S why they went out of business.

Yup, those buying Omnisphere 2 will discover that in a sub-menu Alchemy v2 is included

[Ameyah Audio]

Logic X.1 released without Alchemy

how should they implement that so fast?
this prooves nothing.

[Ameyah Audio]

Alchemy is now officially dead with the latest Omnisphere update. Nobody will give a crap anymore.

Maybe THAT'S why they went out of business.

Yup, those buying Omnisphere 2 will discover that in a sub-menu Alchemy v2 is included

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[t3toooo]

Camelaudio's ruminations leave me with several unanswered questions: In view of its nerdy sophistries, what does it make sense for us to do now? And has anyone ever seen it working instead of plundering, stealing, and living off the sweat of others? These are difficult questions to answer because it decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that camelaudio fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. The following theorem may therefore be established as an eternally valid truth: Camelaudio keeps telling everyone within earshot that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I'm guessing that camelaudio read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that some of you are probably wondering, “Why does it associate with unimaginative, inimical protestors who are bent on giving rise to unscrupulous, maleficent anthropophagi?” Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that it is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it minces to the twang of a different zither. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that if we fail to build a sane and healthy society free of camelaudio's destructive influences then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The “decay of that colossal wreck,” as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that camelaudio should stop calling me a disputatious drossel. Although I've been called worse things by better organizations, camelaudio likes to argue that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that camelaudio must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why camelaudio accuses me of admitting that the rule of law should give way to the rule of brutality and bribery. What I actually said is that camelaudio will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it foster and intensify its drug-drenched drama of immorality. At least putting up with another camelaudio hissy fit is easier than convincing camelaudio's stooges that camelaudio is putting a huge amount of effort into squashing its self-doubt and hiding its flaws. The more effort it puts into that, the worse things are when these suppressed traits finally bust out. When that happens—and it will clearly happen—you should be sure to remember that I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can say that camelaudio seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I don't say that to judge but merely to put camelaudio's impulsive notions into perspective.

Although camelaudio was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to diminish society's inducements to good behavior, the fact remains that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to “go along to get along” and are rather reluctant to brush away the cobwebs of despotism. It is imperative that we inform such people that camelaudio wallows in its basest behavior—and camelaudio knows it. Many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's plaints are highly meddlesome. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio wants to work hand-in-glove with what I call lackadaisical sleazeballs. Faugh.

Camelaudio's plan is to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to fan the flames of Lysenkoism into a planet-spanning inferno. However, unlike the Nazis, camelaudio doesn't conceal its malevolent goals. Perhaps it's confident that no one will notice that camelaudio had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, it gave us Stalinism, officialism, and exclusionism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since we surely can't afford to let camelaudio equip unconscionable lummoxes with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. What I'm suggesting is that we defy it. That's the key to lifting our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that I correctly predicted that it would reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively—or so soon.

Camelaudio's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Next time, camelaudio, you may want to check your facts correctly. Anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of uncivilized thoughts camelaudio is thinking about these days should realize that camelaudio has especially been targeting schools and universities, trying to convert them into indoctrination centers for totalism. Once such institutions of learning can be coerced into suppressing freedom of expression, free inquiry, independent research, and all objectivity, they will become training grounds for recalcitrant, uncompanionable battologists who are dedicated to serving camelaudio and carrying out its plan of bribing the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. The quest to understand how camelaudio can be so daft raises far more questions than it answers. But I digress. The concept of risk includes the relationship between the consequences and probability of an event. If the consequences of an event are extremely negative, such as the devastation resulting from camelaudio fueling inquisitions, then you want the probability of the event occurring to be vanishingly small, as close to zero as possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood of camelaudio leading people towards iniquity and sin is so high that one can't help but conclude that a large number of people are immensely outraged at it. Camelaudio should ask itself what it has done to incur such wrath. One possibility is that camelaudio claims that the Scriptures are responsible for its mawkish thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only blathering, but it fails to consider that a former member of camelaudio's flock has called camelaudio a lousy haggersnash. I admire this person's courage, but I disagree with his use of the term “lousy haggersnash”. It's not solely because camelaudio is a lousy haggersnash that it has been unleashing the forces of wowserism upon an unsuspecting populace. Rather, it's been doing this because it says it's going to suppress controversy and debate in a matter of days. Good old camelaudio. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how eccentric they sound.

Camelaudio may be reasonably cunning with words. However, it is thoroughly addlepated with everything else. Is it important that camelaudio is not afraid to use violence, ruse, shot and shell, poison, or the dagger to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that I know more about caciquism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, camelaudio's hangers-on have always found a way to form the association in the public's mind between any press releases camelaudio disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality.

For some odd reason, camelaudio believes that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Its unasinous winged monkeys, who believe likewise, also fail to see that camelaudio's epithets should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, “Warning: It has been determined that camelaudio's memoirs are intended to poison the relationship between teacher and student.”

I am not going to go into too great a detail about unsympathetic manipulators of the public mind, but be assured that if camelaudio's diegeses were intended as a joke, camelaudio forgot to include the punchline. The long and short of it is that the only effective and responsible course of action is to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically laughable ones championed by irascible authoritarians—an often frustrating prescription, to be sure. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does camelaudio assert that it acts in the name of equality and social justice? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that camelaudio's functionaries don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat nettlesome.

If I seem a bit fastidious, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with camelaudio on its own level. My argument is that camelaudio's disquisitions epitomize our most cullionly instincts. Ridiculous? Not so.

I have some advice for camelaudio. It should keep its mouth shut until it stops being such a scummy fraudster and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining. Although I respect camelaudio's right to free speech just as I respect it for hateful, mephitic disloyal-types, obtrusive slangwhangers, and daffy beguilers, I, speaking as someone who is not a lawless nithing, experienced quite an epiphany when I first realized that society should recognize that its position that it's hypersensitive to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by it and its lickspittles is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. Have you noticed that that hasn't been covered at all by the mainstream media? Maybe they're afraid that camelaudio will retaliate by introducing changes without testing them first. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.


Some of what I'm about to say regarding camelaudio's barbs is so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I apologize in advance. It is worth noting at the outset that camelaudio is not only unbridled but is addicted to being unbridled. And here we have the crux of the problem. Disagree in any manner with camelaudio's orthodoxy and it calls you an execrable, presumptuous renegade. Or is it an uncouth, stubborn no-goodnik? I get so confused with all the various pejoratives that camelaudio throws around like confetti. In any case, camelaudio adamantly maintains that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Such beliefs would be utterly factual if it weren't for reality. As it stands, camelaudio exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because I've heard of insipid things like particularism and hoodlumism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that its ignorant, unthinking, unconscionable brain is too small to understand.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but camelaudio says that the government (and perhaps it itself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, “They're not in here!”? Whenever I ask camelaudio for proof of its claim that it is patriotic to snatch people off the street and transport them across the world to be tortured, it runs and hides. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Camelaudio was a virulent extortionist when I first encountered it. Camelaudio is a virulent extortionist now. And there is no more reason for believing that camelaudio will ever cease to be a virulent extortionist than there is for supposing that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius.

Camelaudio's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “camelaudio-ism”. It is a whiney and avowedly mendacious philosophy that aims to cashier anyone who tries to induce camelaudio to perceive its errors of perception and judgment and make it realize that it fully deserves the bitter fruit of the fury of its persecutors. I am being totally serious when I say that a day of reckoning is coming, and camelaudio will be called to account. That's just a fancy way of saying that camelaudio knows exactly where it wants its foes. It wants to put them in the lowest-paying jobs. It wants to put them outside the equal protection of the law. It wants to put them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. And then it expects them to sing its praises? The reality is that if my memory serves me correctly, there's a famous mathematical proof that pertains to camelaudio. Essentially, this proof asserts that given that camelaudio is a hypocrite who preaches morality and virtue while simultaneously posing a threat to personal autonomy and social development, then, loosely speaking, it must be the case that courage is what we need to deliver new information about its ill-tempered half-measures—not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a hateful, myopic ninny in the eye and tell him that camelaudio has no soul. This notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to preserve the peace. It can convince even the most supercilious fatheads there are that when camelaudio stated that criminals are merely social rebels, I concluded that it was thoroughly morbid. Now that it claims that hanging out with prolix, vain fomenters of revolution is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, I feel that it's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism.

Camelaudio has planted its dupes everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance camelaudio's ability to teach our children a version of history that is not only skewed, distorted, and wrong but dangerously so, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that of all of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: “There exists evidence that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal.” I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is dead wrong. As if you didn't know, it is more than a purely historical question to ask, “How did camelaudio's reign of terror start?” or even the more urgent question, “How might it end?”. No, we must ask, “Why does camelaudio hate our country?” I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that camelaudio's bruta fulmina are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.

Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that if camelaudio were paying attention—which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this—it'd see that its followers don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat inhumane. The virus of poststructuralism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to camelaudio's protests, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that the basal lie that underlies all of camelaudio's devious hijinks is that it would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a meddlesome act. Translation: Truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that a surprisingly large number of costive saps consider camelaudio to be their savior. This overwhelmingly positive view of camelaudio is obviously not shared by those who have been victims of camelaudio's traducements or by those who believe that many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's grievances are highly hypocritical. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon without any real morality, without a soul.

Some people consider camelaudio's refrains a necessary evil, but the truth is that camelaudio likes to brag about how the members of its ruffianism movement are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, if you were to try to tell camelaudio's compatriots in anarchism that its comrades are once again out begging for signatures for some uncompanionable petition that makes it legal for camelaudio to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that camelaudio has managed to convince a vast assortment of people that the future of the entire world rests in its hands. That's just further evidence that the most insidious thing in the world is nonsense that sounds just plausible enough to listen to. It's the sort of nonsense that prevents people from seeing that the voices of camelaudio's victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by encouraging individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that I support the way of willing exchange, of common consent, of self-responsibility, of open opportunity. Camelaudio, in contrast, supports tapping into the national resurgence of overt fetishism. This difference in what we each support indicates that a great many of us don't want it to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. Still, we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to its patronizing, vexatious remonstrations.

I'm not afraid of camelaudio. However, I am concerned that it loves generating drama and conflict. That's why camelaudio repeatedly insists that everything is happy and fine and good. It's also why it believes in branding me as power-hungry. Camelaudio's theatrics manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: diminish society's inducements to good behavior. Phase two: produce a large number of absolutely cynical extravagancies, most hopeless indecencies, and, above all, the most frowsy blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear.

Camelaudio hates it when you say that nothing offends it more than the truth. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you. Camelaudio has long been supporting hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. What worries me more than that, however, is that if camelaudio ever manages to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning.

Every one of us has a role in saving this country from camelaudio's wishy-washy plunderbund. We all know that camelaudio has put our country in trouble. We may disagree on what to do about it, but we all know that our country is in trouble. May I suggest, therefore, that we discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic? Doing so may help even bumptious heretics see that in asserting that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments, camelaudio demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Given that camelaudio wants people to be fined, exiled, or imprisoned for making snide remarks about its politics, it stands to reason that it believes that it answers to no one. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by camelaudio and its sullen, scurrilous adulators.

On a more personal note, I am not au fait with camelaudio's latest strictures. I am, however, quite familiar with the manner in which it has been getting people to vote against their own self-interests. In particular, I know that in a way, I'm glad I've experienced firsthand just how birdbrained it can be. It's one thing to read about camelaudio's collapsing the society that sustains us all, but it's quite another to be subjected personally to its attempts to make me tear off all my clothes and run naked down the street. I conclude this letter with an appropriate quote: “Camelaudio's outrage at complaints about it is indicative of its self-esteem and value system.” I believe we all know who said that, don't we?

[U-o]

I sent 3 emails to Camel Audio about licence transfer, but my inquiry is still open. Bad support, really bad!!!

[audientronic]

Camelaudio's ruminations leave me with several unanswered questions: In view of its nerdy sophistries, what does it make sense for us to do now? And has anyone ever seen it working instead of plundering, stealing, and living off the sweat of others? These are difficult questions to answer because it decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that camelaudio fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. The following theorem may therefore be established as an eternally valid truth: Camelaudio keeps telling everyone within earshot that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I'm guessing that camelaudio read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that some of you are probably wondering, “Why does it associate with unimaginative, inimical protestors who are bent on giving rise to unscrupulous, maleficent anthropophagi?” Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that it is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it minces to the twang of a different zither. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that if we fail to build a sane and healthy society free of camelaudio's destructive influences then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The “decay of that colossal wreck,” as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that camelaudio should stop calling me a disputatious drossel. Although I've been called worse things by better organizations, camelaudio likes to argue that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that camelaudio must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why camelaudio accuses me of admitting that the rule of law should give way to the rule of brutality and bribery. What I actually said is that camelaudio will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it foster and intensify its drug-drenched drama of immorality. At least putting up with another camelaudio hissy fit is easier than convincing camelaudio's stooges that camelaudio is putting a huge amount of effort into squashing its self-doubt and hiding its flaws. The more effort it puts into that, the worse things are when these suppressed traits finally bust out. When that happens—and it will clearly happen—you should be sure to remember that I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can say that camelaudio seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I don't say that to judge but merely to put camelaudio's impulsive notions into perspective.

Although camelaudio was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to diminish society's inducements to good behavior, the fact remains that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to “go along to get along” and are rather reluctant to brush away the cobwebs of despotism. It is imperative that we inform such people that camelaudio wallows in its basest behavior—and camelaudio knows it. Many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's plaints are highly meddlesome. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio wants to work hand-in-glove with what I call lackadaisical sleazeballs. Faugh.

Camelaudio's plan is to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to fan the flames of Lysenkoism into a planet-spanning inferno. However, unlike the Nazis, camelaudio doesn't conceal its malevolent goals. Perhaps it's confident that no one will notice that camelaudio had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, it gave us Stalinism, officialism, and exclusionism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since we surely can't afford to let camelaudio equip unconscionable lummoxes with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. What I'm suggesting is that we defy it. That's the key to lifting our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that I correctly predicted that it would reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively—or so soon.

Camelaudio's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Next time, camelaudio, you may want to check your facts correctly. Anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of uncivilized thoughts camelaudio is thinking about these days should realize that camelaudio has especially been targeting schools and universities, trying to convert them into indoctrination centers for totalism. Once such institutions of learning can be coerced into suppressing freedom of expression, free inquiry, independent research, and all objectivity, they will become training grounds for recalcitrant, uncompanionable battologists who are dedicated to serving camelaudio and carrying out its plan of bribing the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. The quest to understand how camelaudio can be so daft raises far more questions than it answers. But I digress. The concept of risk includes the relationship between the consequences and probability of an event. If the consequences of an event are extremely negative, such as the devastation resulting from camelaudio fueling inquisitions, then you want the probability of the event occurring to be vanishingly small, as close to zero as possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood of camelaudio leading people towards iniquity and sin is so high that one can't help but conclude that a large number of people are immensely outraged at it. Camelaudio should ask itself what it has done to incur such wrath. One possibility is that camelaudio claims that the Scriptures are responsible for its mawkish thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only blathering, but it fails to consider that a former member of camelaudio's flock has called camelaudio a lousy haggersnash. I admire this person's courage, but I disagree with his use of the term “lousy haggersnash”. It's not solely because camelaudio is a lousy haggersnash that it has been unleashing the forces of wowserism upon an unsuspecting populace. Rather, it's been doing this because it says it's going to suppress controversy and debate in a matter of days. Good old camelaudio. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how eccentric they sound.

Camelaudio may be reasonably cunning with words. However, it is thoroughly addlepated with everything else. Is it important that camelaudio is not afraid to use violence, ruse, shot and shell, poison, or the dagger to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that I know more about caciquism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, camelaudio's hangers-on have always found a way to form the association in the public's mind between any press releases camelaudio disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality.

For some odd reason, camelaudio believes that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Its unasinous winged monkeys, who believe likewise, also fail to see that camelaudio's epithets should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, “Warning: It has been determined that camelaudio's memoirs are intended to poison the relationship between teacher and student.”

I am not going to go into too great a detail about unsympathetic manipulators of the public mind, but be assured that if camelaudio's diegeses were intended as a joke, camelaudio forgot to include the punchline. The long and short of it is that the only effective and responsible course of action is to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically laughable ones championed by irascible authoritarians—an often frustrating prescription, to be sure. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does camelaudio assert that it acts in the name of equality and social justice? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that camelaudio's functionaries don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat nettlesome.

If I seem a bit fastidious, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with camelaudio on its own level. My argument is that camelaudio's disquisitions epitomize our most cullionly instincts. Ridiculous? Not so.

I have some advice for camelaudio. It should keep its mouth shut until it stops being such a scummy fraudster and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining. Although I respect camelaudio's right to free speech just as I respect it for hateful, mephitic disloyal-types, obtrusive slangwhangers, and daffy beguilers, I, speaking as someone who is not a lawless nithing, experienced quite an epiphany when I first realized that society should recognize that its position that it's hypersensitive to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by it and its lickspittles is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. Have you noticed that that hasn't been covered at all by the mainstream media? Maybe they're afraid that camelaudio will retaliate by introducing changes without testing them first. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.


Some of what I'm about to say regarding camelaudio's barbs is so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I apologize in advance. It is worth noting at the outset that camelaudio is not only unbridled but is addicted to being unbridled. And here we have the crux of the problem. Disagree in any manner with camelaudio's orthodoxy and it calls you an execrable, presumptuous renegade. Or is it an uncouth, stubborn no-goodnik? I get so confused with all the various pejoratives that camelaudio throws around like confetti. In any case, camelaudio adamantly maintains that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Such beliefs would be utterly factual if it weren't for reality. As it stands, camelaudio exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because I've heard of insipid things like particularism and hoodlumism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that its ignorant, unthinking, unconscionable brain is too small to understand.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but camelaudio says that the government (and perhaps it itself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, “They're not in here!”? Whenever I ask camelaudio for proof of its claim that it is patriotic to snatch people off the street and transport them across the world to be tortured, it runs and hides. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Camelaudio was a virulent extortionist when I first encountered it. Camelaudio is a virulent extortionist now. And there is no more reason for believing that camelaudio will ever cease to be a virulent extortionist than there is for supposing that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius.

Camelaudio's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “camelaudio-ism”. It is a whiney and avowedly mendacious philosophy that aims to cashier anyone who tries to induce camelaudio to perceive its errors of perception and judgment and make it realize that it fully deserves the bitter fruit of the fury of its persecutors. I am being totally serious when I say that a day of reckoning is coming, and camelaudio will be called to account. That's just a fancy way of saying that camelaudio knows exactly where it wants its foes. It wants to put them in the lowest-paying jobs. It wants to put them outside the equal protection of the law. It wants to put them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. And then it expects them to sing its praises? The reality is that if my memory serves me correctly, there's a famous mathematical proof that pertains to camelaudio. Essentially, this proof asserts that given that camelaudio is a hypocrite who preaches morality and virtue while simultaneously posing a threat to personal autonomy and social development, then, loosely speaking, it must be the case that courage is what we need to deliver new information about its ill-tempered half-measures—not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a hateful, myopic ninny in the eye and tell him that camelaudio has no soul. This notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to preserve the peace. It can convince even the most supercilious fatheads there are that when camelaudio stated that criminals are merely social rebels, I concluded that it was thoroughly morbid. Now that it claims that hanging out with prolix, vain fomenters of revolution is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, I feel that it's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism.

Camelaudio has planted its dupes everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance camelaudio's ability to teach our children a version of history that is not only skewed, distorted, and wrong but dangerously so, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that of all of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: “There exists evidence that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal.” I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is dead wrong. As if you didn't know, it is more than a purely historical question to ask, “How did camelaudio's reign of terror start?” or even the more urgent question, “How might it end?”. No, we must ask, “Why does camelaudio hate our country?” I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that camelaudio's bruta fulmina are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.

Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that if camelaudio were paying attention—which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this—it'd see that its followers don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat inhumane. The virus of poststructuralism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to camelaudio's protests, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that the basal lie that underlies all of camelaudio's devious hijinks is that it would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a meddlesome act. Translation: Truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that a surprisingly large number of costive saps consider camelaudio to be their savior. This overwhelmingly positive view of camelaudio is obviously not shared by those who have been victims of camelaudio's traducements or by those who believe that many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's grievances are highly hypocritical. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon without any real morality, without a soul.

Some people consider camelaudio's refrains a necessary evil, but the truth is that camelaudio likes to brag about how the members of its ruffianism movement are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, if you were to try to tell camelaudio's compatriots in anarchism that its comrades are once again out begging for signatures for some uncompanionable petition that makes it legal for camelaudio to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that camelaudio has managed to convince a vast assortment of people that the future of the entire world rests in its hands. That's just further evidence that the most insidious thing in the world is nonsense that sounds just plausible enough to listen to. It's the sort of nonsense that prevents people from seeing that the voices of camelaudio's victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by encouraging individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that I support the way of willing exchange, of common consent, of self-responsibility, of open opportunity. Camelaudio, in contrast, supports tapping into the national resurgence of overt fetishism. This difference in what we each support indicates that a great many of us don't want it to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. Still, we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to its patronizing, vexatious remonstrations.

I'm not afraid of camelaudio. However, I am concerned that it loves generating drama and conflict. That's why camelaudio repeatedly insists that everything is happy and fine and good. It's also why it believes in branding me as power-hungry. Camelaudio's theatrics manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: diminish society's inducements to good behavior. Phase two: produce a large number of absolutely cynical extravagancies, most hopeless indecencies, and, above all, the most frowsy blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear.

Camelaudio hates it when you say that nothing offends it more than the truth. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you. Camelaudio has long been supporting hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. What worries me more than that, however, is that if camelaudio ever manages to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning.

Every one of us has a role in saving this country from camelaudio's wishy-washy plunderbund. We all know that camelaudio has put our country in trouble. We may disagree on what to do about it, but we all know that our country is in trouble. May I suggest, therefore, that we discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic? Doing so may help even bumptious heretics see that in asserting that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments, camelaudio demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Given that camelaudio wants people to be fined, exiled, or imprisoned for making snide remarks about its politics, it stands to reason that it believes that it answers to no one. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by camelaudio and its sullen, scurrilous adulators.

On a more personal note, I am not au fait with camelaudio's latest strictures. I am, however, quite familiar with the manner in which it has been getting people to vote against their own self-interests. In particular, I know that in a way, I'm glad I've experienced firsthand just how birdbrained it can be. It's one thing to read about camelaudio's collapsing the society that sustains us all, but it's quite another to be subjected personally to its attempts to make me tear off all my clothes and run naked down the street. I conclude this letter with an appropriate quote: “Camelaudio's outrage at complaints about it is indicative of its self-esteem and value system.” I believe we all know who said that, don't we?

I keep receiving fragments of this as junk e-mail.

[Phorous]

I sent 3 emails to Camel Audio about licence transfer, but my inquiry is still open. Bad support, really bad!!!

They took close to a week to transfer CamelPhat to me, so yeah expect it to be a while.

[t3toooo]

Camelaudio's ruminations leave me with several unanswered questions: In view of its nerdy sophistries, what does it make sense for us to do now? And has anyone ever seen it working instead of plundering, stealing, and living off the sweat of others? These are difficult questions to answer because it decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that camelaudio fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. The following theorem may therefore be established as an eternally valid truth: Camelaudio keeps telling everyone within earshot that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I'm guessing that camelaudio read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that some of you are probably wondering, “Why does it associate with unimaginative, inimical protestors who are bent on giving rise to unscrupulous, maleficent anthropophagi?” Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that it is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it minces to the twang of a different zither. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that if we fail to build a sane and healthy society free of camelaudio's destructive influences then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The “decay of that colossal wreck,” as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that camelaudio should stop calling me a disputatious drossel. Although I've been called worse things by better organizations, camelaudio likes to argue that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that camelaudio must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why camelaudio accuses me of admitting that the rule of law should give way to the rule of brutality and bribery. What I actually said is that camelaudio will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it foster and intensify its drug-drenched drama of immorality. At least putting up with another camelaudio hissy fit is easier than convincing camelaudio's stooges that camelaudio is putting a huge amount of effort into squashing its self-doubt and hiding its flaws. The more effort it puts into that, the worse things are when these suppressed traits finally bust out. When that happens—and it will clearly happen—you should be sure to remember that I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can say that camelaudio seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I don't say that to judge but merely to put camelaudio's impulsive notions into perspective.

Although camelaudio was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to diminish society's inducements to good behavior, the fact remains that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to “go along to get along” and are rather reluctant to brush away the cobwebs of despotism. It is imperative that we inform such people that camelaudio wallows in its basest behavior—and camelaudio knows it. Many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's plaints are highly meddlesome. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio wants to work hand-in-glove with what I call lackadaisical sleazeballs. Faugh.

Camelaudio's plan is to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to fan the flames of Lysenkoism into a planet-spanning inferno. However, unlike the Nazis, camelaudio doesn't conceal its malevolent goals. Perhaps it's confident that no one will notice that camelaudio had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, it gave us Stalinism, officialism, and exclusionism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since we surely can't afford to let camelaudio equip unconscionable lummoxes with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. What I'm suggesting is that we defy it. That's the key to lifting our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that I correctly predicted that it would reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively—or so soon.

Camelaudio's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Next time, camelaudio, you may want to check your facts correctly. Anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of uncivilized thoughts camelaudio is thinking about these days should realize that camelaudio has especially been targeting schools and universities, trying to convert them into indoctrination centers for totalism. Once such institutions of learning can be coerced into suppressing freedom of expression, free inquiry, independent research, and all objectivity, they will become training grounds for recalcitrant, uncompanionable battologists who are dedicated to serving camelaudio and carrying out its plan of bribing the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. The quest to understand how camelaudio can be so daft raises far more questions than it answers. But I digress. The concept of risk includes the relationship between the consequences and probability of an event. If the consequences of an event are extremely negative, such as the devastation resulting from camelaudio fueling inquisitions, then you want the probability of the event occurring to be vanishingly small, as close to zero as possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood of camelaudio leading people towards iniquity and sin is so high that one can't help but conclude that a large number of people are immensely outraged at it. Camelaudio should ask itself what it has done to incur such wrath. One possibility is that camelaudio claims that the Scriptures are responsible for its mawkish thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only blathering, but it fails to consider that a former member of camelaudio's flock has called camelaudio a lousy haggersnash. I admire this person's courage, but I disagree with his use of the term “lousy haggersnash”. It's not solely because camelaudio is a lousy haggersnash that it has been unleashing the forces of wowserism upon an unsuspecting populace. Rather, it's been doing this because it says it's going to suppress controversy and debate in a matter of days. Good old camelaudio. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how eccentric they sound.

Camelaudio may be reasonably cunning with words. However, it is thoroughly addlepated with everything else. Is it important that camelaudio is not afraid to use violence, ruse, shot and shell, poison, or the dagger to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that I know more about caciquism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, camelaudio's hangers-on have always found a way to form the association in the public's mind between any press releases camelaudio disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality.

For some odd reason, camelaudio believes that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Its unasinous winged monkeys, who believe likewise, also fail to see that camelaudio's epithets should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, “Warning: It has been determined that camelaudio's memoirs are intended to poison the relationship between teacher and student.”

I am not going to go into too great a detail about unsympathetic manipulators of the public mind, but be assured that if camelaudio's diegeses were intended as a joke, camelaudio forgot to include the punchline. The long and short of it is that the only effective and responsible course of action is to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically laughable ones championed by irascible authoritarians—an often frustrating prescription, to be sure. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does camelaudio assert that it acts in the name of equality and social justice? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that camelaudio's functionaries don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat nettlesome.

If I seem a bit fastidious, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with camelaudio on its own level. My argument is that camelaudio's disquisitions epitomize our most cullionly instincts. Ridiculous? Not so.

I have some advice for camelaudio. It should keep its mouth shut until it stops being such a scummy fraudster and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining. Although I respect camelaudio's right to free speech just as I respect it for hateful, mephitic disloyal-types, obtrusive slangwhangers, and daffy beguilers, I, speaking as someone who is not a lawless nithing, experienced quite an epiphany when I first realized that society should recognize that its position that it's hypersensitive to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by it and its lickspittles is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. Have you noticed that that hasn't been covered at all by the mainstream media? Maybe they're afraid that camelaudio will retaliate by introducing changes without testing them first. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.


Some of what I'm about to say regarding camelaudio's barbs is so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I apologize in advance. It is worth noting at the outset that camelaudio is not only unbridled but is addicted to being unbridled. And here we have the crux of the problem. Disagree in any manner with camelaudio's orthodoxy and it calls you an execrable, presumptuous renegade. Or is it an uncouth, stubborn no-goodnik? I get so confused with all the various pejoratives that camelaudio throws around like confetti. In any case, camelaudio adamantly maintains that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Such beliefs would be utterly factual if it weren't for reality. As it stands, camelaudio exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because I've heard of insipid things like particularism and hoodlumism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that its ignorant, unthinking, unconscionable brain is too small to understand.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but camelaudio says that the government (and perhaps it itself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, “They're not in here!”? Whenever I ask camelaudio for proof of its claim that it is patriotic to snatch people off the street and transport them across the world to be tortured, it runs and hides. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Camelaudio was a virulent extortionist when I first encountered it. Camelaudio is a virulent extortionist now. And there is no more reason for believing that camelaudio will ever cease to be a virulent extortionist than there is for supposing that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius.

Camelaudio's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “camelaudio-ism”. It is a whiney and avowedly mendacious philosophy that aims to cashier anyone who tries to induce camelaudio to perceive its errors of perception and judgment and make it realize that it fully deserves the bitter fruit of the fury of its persecutors. I am being totally serious when I say that a day of reckoning is coming, and camelaudio will be called to account. That's just a fancy way of saying that camelaudio knows exactly where it wants its foes. It wants to put them in the lowest-paying jobs. It wants to put them outside the equal protection of the law. It wants to put them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. And then it expects them to sing its praises? The reality is that if my memory serves me correctly, there's a famous mathematical proof that pertains to camelaudio. Essentially, this proof asserts that given that camelaudio is a hypocrite who preaches morality and virtue while simultaneously posing a threat to personal autonomy and social development, then, loosely speaking, it must be the case that courage is what we need to deliver new information about its ill-tempered half-measures—not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a hateful, myopic ninny in the eye and tell him that camelaudio has no soul. This notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to preserve the peace. It can convince even the most supercilious fatheads there are that when camelaudio stated that criminals are merely social rebels, I concluded that it was thoroughly morbid. Now that it claims that hanging out with prolix, vain fomenters of revolution is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, I feel that it's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism.

Camelaudio has planted its dupes everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance camelaudio's ability to teach our children a version of history that is not only skewed, distorted, and wrong but dangerously so, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that of all of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: “There exists evidence that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal.” I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is dead wrong. As if you didn't know, it is more than a purely historical question to ask, “How did camelaudio's reign of terror start?” or even the more urgent question, “How might it end?”. No, we must ask, “Why does camelaudio hate our country?” I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that camelaudio's bruta fulmina are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.

Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that if camelaudio were paying attention—which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this—it'd see that its followers don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat inhumane. The virus of poststructuralism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to camelaudio's protests, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that the basal lie that underlies all of camelaudio's devious hijinks is that it would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a meddlesome act. Translation: Truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that a surprisingly large number of costive saps consider camelaudio to be their savior. This overwhelmingly positive view of camelaudio is obviously not shared by those who have been victims of camelaudio's traducements or by those who believe that many scholars have already concluded that camelaudio's grievances are highly hypocritical. Nevertheless, it's still worth reexamining them in the light of new information, new research, and new insights. Doing so is sure to reveal that camelaudio is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon without any real morality, without a soul.

Some people consider camelaudio's refrains a necessary evil, but the truth is that camelaudio likes to brag about how the members of its ruffianism movement are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, if you were to try to tell camelaudio's compatriots in anarchism that its comrades are once again out begging for signatures for some uncompanionable petition that makes it legal for camelaudio to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that camelaudio has managed to convince a vast assortment of people that the future of the entire world rests in its hands. That's just further evidence that the most insidious thing in the world is nonsense that sounds just plausible enough to listen to. It's the sort of nonsense that prevents people from seeing that the voices of camelaudio's victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by encouraging individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that I support the way of willing exchange, of common consent, of self-responsibility, of open opportunity. Camelaudio, in contrast, supports tapping into the national resurgence of overt fetishism. This difference in what we each support indicates that a great many of us don't want it to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. Still, we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to its patronizing, vexatious remonstrations.

I'm not afraid of camelaudio. However, I am concerned that it loves generating drama and conflict. That's why camelaudio repeatedly insists that everything is happy and fine and good. It's also why it believes in branding me as power-hungry. Camelaudio's theatrics manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: diminish society's inducements to good behavior. Phase two: produce a large number of absolutely cynical extravagancies, most hopeless indecencies, and, above all, the most frowsy blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear.

Camelaudio hates it when you say that nothing offends it more than the truth. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you. Camelaudio has long been supporting hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. What worries me more than that, however, is that if camelaudio ever manages to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning.

Every one of us has a role in saving this country from camelaudio's wishy-washy plunderbund. We all know that camelaudio has put our country in trouble. We may disagree on what to do about it, but we all know that our country is in trouble. May I suggest, therefore, that we discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic? Doing so may help even bumptious heretics see that in asserting that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments, camelaudio demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Given that camelaudio wants people to be fined, exiled, or imprisoned for making snide remarks about its politics, it stands to reason that it believes that it answers to no one. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by camelaudio and its sullen, scurrilous adulators.

On a more personal note, I am not au fait with camelaudio's latest strictures. I am, however, quite familiar with the manner in which it has been getting people to vote against their own self-interests. In particular, I know that in a way, I'm glad I've experienced firsthand just how birdbrained it can be. It's one thing to read about camelaudio's collapsing the society that sustains us all, but it's quite another to be subjected personally to its attempts to make me tear off all my clothes and run naked down the street. I conclude this letter with an appropriate quote: “Camelaudio's outrage at complaints about it is indicative of its self-esteem and value system.” I believe we all know who said that, don't we?

I keep receiving fragments of this as junk e-mail.

Where?

[U-o]

I sent 3 emails to Camel Audio about licence transfer, but my inquiry is still open. Bad support, really bad!!!

They took close to a week to transfer CamelPhat to me, so yeah expect it to be a while.

I bought Phat/Space few days ago, sent money and second day I got them both. I thought, that it will be quick to transfer my Taste Of Camel to someone else.

[Cinebient]

Yep, with Omnisphere 2.0 and sample import my life can go on
Damn.... Eric Persing looks so thin...

[Cimbasso]

Sent them 2 emails and nothing, shameful support, especially when you remember how prompt and active they always were. Definitely not fair to their faithful fan base.

[wagtunes]

I sent them an email when this thread first started. Never heard back from them.

Whatever. Omnisphere has made them irrelevant.

[SuitcaseOfLizards]

Alchemy is now officially dead with the latest Omnisphere update. Nobody will give a crap anymore.

Maybe THAT'S why they went out of business.

Yup, those buying Omnisphere 2 will discover that in a sub-menu Alchemy v2 is included