Zynaptiq Morph
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
I have to admit that I was anti-iLok for a long time. I was pretty much strong-armed into getting one, because I owned Speakerphone 2 (which was NOT cheap software!) and then they came out with the next update which required iLok. But you know what? Now that I'm using it, it really isn't so awful after all. I used to deal with all kinds of dongles for 3D software "back in the day", and this whole system is relatively painless. I understand that some people seem to be experiencing problems with it, but I've been okay so far on three different machines.
Not that it has anything much to do with the topic. Let's see some more Simon videos!
Not that it has anything much to do with the topic. Let's see some more Simon videos!
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
Before posting more vids, here is a written Morph-report.
Yesterday I morphed a flute phrase from an upcoming library with a Serum pad, which set the tonality for the phrase (major7). The results were stunning, the flute phrase turned into some sort of vocal-ish-vocoder-like-of-sound, while the pad adapted the timbre and amplitude of the flute phrase - like a breathing synth, together they formed something totally different. So I sampled about a minute of the repeating phrase morphing with the pad while automating the morph stages and formant filter. Played in a granular sampler and layering it with the original flute phrase, using long grain times and several overlapping grain streams, at different octaves, assigning grain position to Aftertouch so you can scan through the samples - this turns out to be a very amazing one finger phrase-pad. So much to explore...
Oh, back to the iLok thing now...
Yesterday I morphed a flute phrase from an upcoming library with a Serum pad, which set the tonality for the phrase (major7). The results were stunning, the flute phrase turned into some sort of vocal-ish-vocoder-like-of-sound, while the pad adapted the timbre and amplitude of the flute phrase - like a breathing synth, together they formed something totally different. So I sampled about a minute of the repeating phrase morphing with the pad while automating the morph stages and formant filter. Played in a granular sampler and layering it with the original flute phrase, using long grain times and several overlapping grain streams, at different octaves, assigning grain position to Aftertouch so you can scan through the samples - this turns out to be a very amazing one finger phrase-pad. So much to explore...
Oh, back to the iLok thing now...
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
[trolling]
And I hate eggs. I hate scrambled eggs, boiled eggs, eggs in a glass, eggs on a table. Eggs will get none of my business. And broccoli, broccoli ist just awful, I would have bought it if it wasn't broccoli, but as it is broccoli, it will get none of my business - eat that - period!
[/trolling]
And I hate eggs. I hate scrambled eggs, boiled eggs, eggs in a glass, eggs on a table. Eggs will get none of my business. And broccoli, broccoli ist just awful, I would have bought it if it wasn't broccoli, but as it is broccoli, it will get none of my business - eat that - period!
[/trolling]
- KVRAF
- 1986 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
is it now?rustman wrote:
BAITED
That's how you spell baited without referring to something very private.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bated+breath
- KVRAF
- 1986 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
i dont get why people who dont get things need to express that they feel their lack of understanding of things means that the people who do understand them shouldnt do them. why is this of any importance to the rest of the world? and please dont enlighten us, we really dont want to know.Sampleconstruct wrote:I just don't get why iLok-haters think that the whole world should be informed about the fact that they hate iLoks. Why is this of any importance to the rest of the world? And please don't enlighten us, we don't want to know.
at the very least...the discussion of ilok is relevant to the topic...the discussion of the discussion of ilok is not.
- KVRAF
- 3362 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Probably because it's annoying and detracts from discussion about what the plugin is rather than what it's not.chaosWyrM wrote:i dont get why people who dont get things need to express that they feel their lack of understanding of things means that the people who do understand them shouldnt do them. why is this of any importance to the rest of the world?Sampleconstruct wrote:I just don't get why iLok-haters think that the whole world should be informed about the fact that they hate iLoks. Why is this of any importance to the rest of the world? And please don't enlighten us, we don't want to know.
- KVRAF
- 1986 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
masterhiggins wrote:Probably because it's annoying and detracts from discussion about what the plugin is rather than what it's not.chaosWyrM wrote:i dont get why people who dont get things need to express that they feel their lack of understanding of things means that the people who do understand them shouldnt do them. why is this of any importance to the rest of the world?Sampleconstruct wrote:I just don't get why iLok-haters think that the whole world should be informed about the fact that they hate iLoks. Why is this of any importance to the rest of the world? And please don't enlighten us, we don't want to know.
hmmm...pretty sure i said not to enlighten us...you must have forgot to quote that part.
obviously its important in some way for the people who mention it. how does commenting on posts that dont meet your approval help with the discussion of what the plug in is? and by the way...people getting their panties all in a bunch over something thats not important to them is also quite annoying.
none of this thread is important at all. whats so important about coming on this forum and gushing about a plugin? a statement about a negative is as valid as a statement about a positive...whether people like it or not.
zynaptiq decided to use pace/ilok, so now its part of"what the plugin is". who are you (or anyone) to determine for everyone else which aspects of the plugin are worth talking about and which are not?
-
- KVRist
- 343 posts since 13 Jan, 2012 from In the studio, in front of computer.
Hey all,
let me say that we have a good support guy and that if you're having trouble running PACE stuff chances are we'll have you up and running with MORPH really quickly. I remember being annoyed with PACE instability back in the day when you still needed a floppy for the response code, but that's like - what? - 20 years ago? Since then I've had maybe a dozen computer systems, both Mac and Windows based, and have produced 50+ records and sample libraries without *any* PACE related stability issues. Their latest stuff is really solid (well, in my experience, of course).
At any rate, I've met the PACE people in person at several tradeshows, had drinks with them, and they're really nice people that care very much about their stuff working well and painlessly. Maybe you guys should give it a go to see whether the latest and greatest works just fine for you. *Definitely* report any issues you run into to them so they can fix any issues.
Cheers,
Denis
let me say that we have a good support guy and that if you're having trouble running PACE stuff chances are we'll have you up and running with MORPH really quickly. I remember being annoyed with PACE instability back in the day when you still needed a floppy for the response code, but that's like - what? - 20 years ago? Since then I've had maybe a dozen computer systems, both Mac and Windows based, and have produced 50+ records and sample libraries without *any* PACE related stability issues. Their latest stuff is really solid (well, in my experience, of course).
At any rate, I've met the PACE people in person at several tradeshows, had drinks with them, and they're really nice people that care very much about their stuff working well and painlessly. Maybe you guys should give it a go to see whether the latest and greatest works just fine for you. *Definitely* report any issues you run into to them so they can fix any issues.
Cheers,
Denis
Zynaptiq - Audio Software Based On Artificial Intelligence Technology, makers of PITCHMAP: Real-Time Polyphonic Pitch Correction And Mapping.
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
I think that hits the nail in the head. The PACE/iLok has become a toxic brand for a reason. And it is inevitable that anyone associated with it will get some well deserved negative remarks. I know places that had to let people go during the latest big PACE screw up that was not so long ago.chaosWyrM wrote: zynaptiq decided to use pace/ilok, so now its part of"what the plugin is". who are you (or anyone) to determine for everyone else which aspects of the plugin are worth talking about and which are not?
No signature here!
-
- KVRist
- 343 posts since 13 Jan, 2012 from In the studio, in front of computer.
Sorry, I don't agree that we deserve any negativity. We're really cool people making awesome software. Meet me at Musikmesse for a single malt and I'm sure you will agree.robotmonkey wrote:And it is inevitable that anyone associated with it will get some well deserved negative remarks.
-d
Zynaptiq - Audio Software Based On Artificial Intelligence Technology, makers of PITCHMAP: Real-Time Polyphonic Pitch Correction And Mapping.
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
It's not only that PACE has become deservedly toxic brand. It's also that iLok is pretty much a punishment for paying customers that is a source of negativity.zynaptiq wrote:Sorry, I don't agree that we deserve any negativity. We're really cool people making awesome software. Meet me at Musikmesse for a single malt and I'm sure you will agree.robotmonkey wrote:And it is inevitable that anyone associated with it will get some well deserved negative remarks.
-d
No signature here!
-
- KVRAF
- 2233 posts since 28 Jul, 2003
EDIT: nvm.
Morph looks awesome BTW! Definitely saving up to purchase this!!!
Morph looks awesome BTW! Definitely saving up to purchase this!!!
Last edited by Ben H on Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
My main tools: Kontakt, Omnisphere, Samplemodeling + Audio Modeling. Unify = godsend. Tari's libraries also rock.
-
- KVRist
- 343 posts since 13 Jan, 2012 from In the studio, in front of computer.
OK, listen up. I'm going to ignore any PR-best-practices recommendations and be direct about this. You can rant about PACE however much you want, but if you imply that WE are "punishing our customers", you're crossing a line. Your opinion is one thing, your preferences are another, and I'm not going to argue with those – but dissing us because of your personal dislikes is inappropriate. If you want to insult me, that's fine, but please be respectful enough to do so in personrobotmonkey wrote: It's also that iLok is pretty much a punishment for paying customers that is a source of negativity.
Also, you don't NEED an iLok. You can activate a machine.
-d
Zynaptiq - Audio Software Based On Artificial Intelligence Technology, makers of PITCHMAP: Real-Time Polyphonic Pitch Correction And Mapping.
- KVRAF
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
What about "Key of success"Ben H wrote:You know what else I hate? Keys.
Car keys, house keys... any keys really... because you can lose them... or forget them.
And well, let's face it... we should just be able to leave our houses and cars unlocked without fear of people breaking into them and stealing them... or stuff in them.
Think I'm going to stop using cars now... and ditch my house for a cardboard box.
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
Now, no need to get upset. But it is still undeniable fact that PACE/iLok is the worst form of DRM available. Not only do they have a long history of f**kups they are an additional hassle for customers who have paid money for their products. And I think it's great that they have gone software only (surely because otherwise they would be at competitive disadvantage). But it is still the most customer unfriendly form of DRM as it puts paying customer at the mercy of external parties. If iLok works, it's not that bad (except that it constantly runs on your computer's memory and takes up additional resources), but if something happens then this is the worst thing that can happen and you are royally screwed. Not only does it result in a lot of wasted time, it often also results in concrete monetary loss for people who depend on it. CP should 100% absolutely never interfere with anyone using their paid for software and PACE/iLok has a pretty bad record on that.zynaptiq wrote:OK, listen up. I'm going to ignore any PR-best-practices recommendations and be direct about this. You can rant about PACE however much you want, but if you imply that WE are "punishing our customers", you're crossing a line. Your opinion is one thing, your preferences are another, and I'm not going to argue with those – but dissing us because of your personal dislikes is inappropriate. If you want to insult me, that's fine, but please be respectful enough to do so in personrobotmonkey wrote: It's also that iLok is pretty much a punishment for paying customers that is a source of negativity.![]()
Also, you don't NEED an iLok. You can activate a machine.
-d
There are plenty of great companies that seems to manage to have both - great products and support and a customer friendly form of CP. Image-Line, Fabfilter, PSP, Camel Audio (formerly), u-he come immediately to mind.
No signature here!




