Being from the UK I didn't even consider the US charts. You folks hadn't even heard of Kate Bush until Tori Amos started channeling her.wagtunes wrote:"I know what I like" only charted in the UK and hit #21 on the charts.aMUSEd wrote:'I know what I like' was well before that (1974) and at least top 30 (Genesis always had the ability to write songs with good hooks even well before they went mainstream)wagtunes wrote:Groups like Genesis never had top 40 hits until they finally "sold out" and started cranking out crap like "Follow You Follow Me" and "Misunderstanding". "Invisible Touch" was another "let's make some money" song.
Diva Vs. Real Analog
- KVRAF
- 37376 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Everything is relative. For many people, all symphonies sound the same because, for the most part, they use the same instrumentation. You need to really dive deeply into the music itself to spot the differences between the composers. And for most people, that's just too much work.Apostate wrote:I don't see anything wrong with Skrillex. I actually liked that first video he did, with the sample of the lady screaming. And I'm OLD lol!
I think most people who know about music kind of gave up on anything being truly pioneering anymore. But many of those same people think that, besides Wagner, there hasn't really been anything notable in music since Beethoven.
To me that leaves out John Coltrane, Mahler, Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Stevie Wonder, Miles Davis, Brian Wilson, Lennon and McCartney, Johns Cage and Zorn, Phil Spector, George Clinton...
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
You can dismiss the US charts if you want. But facts are facts. More album and single sales come from the US than the UK if for no other reason than the size of the two countries.aMUSEd wrote:Being from the UK I didn't even consider the US charts. You folks hadn't even heard of Kate Bush until Tori Amos started channeling her.wagtunes wrote:"I know what I like" only charted in the UK and hit #21 on the charts.aMUSEd wrote:'I know what I like' was well before that (1974) and at least top 30 (Genesis always had the ability to write songs with good hooks even well before they went mainstream)wagtunes wrote:Groups like Genesis never had top 40 hits until they finally "sold out" and started cranking out crap like "Follow You Follow Me" and "Misunderstanding". "Invisible Touch" was another "let's make some money" song.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Classical music sounds a bit depressing and boring to me, and indeed mostly all the same. There are a few exceptions, mostly romantic French stuff, that I like, but the overwhelming rest sounds cold, soulless, artificial (oddly, as they did not even use synths), mathematical and constructed to me. And Opera is outright irritating and ridiculouswagtunes wrote:Everything is relative. For many people, all symphonies sound the same because, for the most part, they use the same instrumentation. You need to really dive deeply into the music itself to spot the differences between the composers. And for most people, that's just too much work.Apostate wrote:I don't see anything wrong with Skrillex. I actually liked that first video he did, with the sample of the lady screaming. And I'm OLD lol!
I think most people who know about music kind of gave up on anything being truly pioneering anymore. But many of those same people think that, besides Wagner, there hasn't really been anything notable in music since Beethoven.
To me that leaves out John Coltrane, Mahler, Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Stevie Wonder, Miles Davis, Brian Wilson, Lennon and McCartney, Johns Cage and Zorn, Phil Spector, George Clinton...
Of course I might like it had I lived centuries ago, who knows...
Last edited by fluffy_little_something on Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 37376 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
I don't care. If anything that's the problem, bands like Genesis could only get in after they watered their sound down because to get anywhere in the US charts you usually need an enormous marketing machine behind you.wagtunes wrote:You can dismiss the US charts if you want. But facts are facts. More album and single sales come from the US than the UK if for no other reason than the size of the two countries.aMUSEd wrote:Being from the UK I didn't even consider the US charts. You folks hadn't even heard of Kate Bush until Tori Amos started channeling her.wagtunes wrote:"I know what I like" only charted in the UK and hit #21 on the charts.aMUSEd wrote:'I know what I like' was well before that (1974) and at least top 30 (Genesis always had the ability to write songs with good hooks even well before they went mainstream)wagtunes wrote:Groups like Genesis never had top 40 hits until they finally "sold out" and started cranking out crap like "Follow You Follow Me" and "Misunderstanding". "Invisible Touch" was another "let's make some money" song.
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Hey, not everybody likes classical music. I love it.fluffy_little_something wrote:Classical music sounds a bit depressing and boring to me, and indeed mostly all the same. There are a few exceptions, mostly romantic French stuff, that I like, but the overwhelming rest sounds cold, soulless, artificial (oddly, as they did not even use synths), mathematical and constructed to me. And Opera is outright irritating and ridiculouswagtunes wrote:Everything is relative. For many people, all symphonies sound the same because, for the most part, they use the same instrumentation. You need to really dive deeply into the music itself to spot the differences between the composers. And for most people, that's just too much work.Apostate wrote:I don't see anything wrong with Skrillex. I actually liked that first video he did, with the sample of the lady screaming. And I'm OLD lol!
I think most people who know about music kind of gave up on anything being truly pioneering anymore. But many of those same people think that, besides Wagner, there hasn't really been anything notable in music since Beethoven.
To me that leaves out John Coltrane, Mahler, Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Stevie Wonder, Miles Davis, Brian Wilson, Lennon and McCartney, Johns Cage and Zorn, Phil Spector, George Clinton...
Well, most of it.
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I won't even argue with that. I agree. It's a problem IF you're a purist and want a group to stay true to their roots.aMUSEd wrote:I don't care. If anything that's the problem, bands like Genesis could only get in after they watered their sound down because to get anywhere in the US charts you usually need an enormous marketing machine behind you.wagtunes wrote:aMUSEd wrote:Being from the UK I didn't even consider the US charts. You folks hadn't even heard of Kate Bush until Tori Amos started channeling her.wagtunes wrote:"I know what I like" only charted in the UK and hit #21 on the charts.aMUSEd wrote:'I know what I like' was well before that (1974) and at least top 30 (Genesis always had the ability to write songs with good hooks even well before they went mainstream)wagtunes wrote:Groups like Genesis never had top 40 hits until they finally "sold out" and started cranking out crap like "Follow You Follow Me" and "Misunderstanding". "Invisible Touch" was another "let's make some money" song.
You can dismiss the US charts if you want. But facts are facts. More album and single sales come from the US than the UK if for no other reason than the size of the two countries.
In an interview with Phil Collins (I wish I could find it) he was asked about "selling out" when they finally made it big. His answer was along the lines of "I don't really look at it as selling out as expanding our musical horizons." In short, he basically said that the group always made music that they liked.
Was he being honest? No way to know. Personally, I don't really care. I don't blame him for wanting to make money if that's what his goal was.
For the record, Genesis is still one of my all time favorite groups. I just didn't care for their stuff in the 80s.
-
- KVRAF
- 1607 posts since 12 Apr, 2002
Musical enough?fluffy_little_something wrote:Abusing a synth, what is the purpose of that? There was a video of a Japanese guy kind of abusing a Minimoog pages ago, but frankly, most of those sounds had no musical value in my view.
Extreme sounds may be of interest to about 1% of synth users, for the rest stuff from Xils, Tal, GForce, U-he etc. will do.
http://vk.com/wall161447783_2956
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
The accusation of selling out is odd. If someone makes music that doesn't appeal to people, they should do it as a hobby. But when you want to make a living from music, you need to be popular to a certain extent. And most people simply are not into weird and progressive music, but into simpler, more pleasant, easier to digest music. They want to feel rather than analyze music.
Kool and the Gang have also been accused of selling out, but I like both their earlier stuff and some of their successful stuff. Selling does not necessarily mean producing crap.
With many bands it is just an evolution. As long as people are young they automatically like to experiment a lot, not just in music, and as they get older they calm down so to speak.
Kool and the Gang have also been accused of selling out, but I like both their earlier stuff and some of their successful stuff. Selling does not necessarily mean producing crap.
With many bands it is just an evolution. As long as people are young they automatically like to experiment a lot, not just in music, and as they get older they calm down so to speak.
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Cool! What synth was that made with?Z1202 wrote:Musical enough?fluffy_little_something wrote:Abusing a synth, what is the purpose of that? There was a video of a Japanese guy kind of abusing a Minimoog pages ago, but frankly, most of those sounds had no musical value in my view.
Extreme sounds may be of interest to about 1% of synth users, for the rest stuff from Xils, Tal, GForce, U-he etc. will do.
http://vk.com/wall161447783_2956
-
Hank the Knife Hank the Knife https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=362962
- Banned
- 301 posts since 16 Jul, 2015 from Where You Cannot Scream
Phil Collins is a guy who pretty well knows how to sell HIMSELF. If you get my drift..
Don't know what it has to do with the topic though
Don't know what it has to do with the topic though
-
- KVRAF
- 1607 posts since 12 Apr, 2002
Some custom DSP in Reaktor Core. Nothing fancy, just some extreme settings. Essentially just the same old square waveform.wagtunes wrote:Cool! What synth was that made with?Z1202 wrote:Musical enough?fluffy_little_something wrote:Abusing a synth, what is the purpose of that? There was a video of a Japanese guy kind of abusing a Minimoog pages ago, but frankly, most of those sounds had no musical value in my view.
Extreme sounds may be of interest to about 1% of synth users, for the rest stuff from Xils, Tal, GForce, U-he etc. will do.
http://vk.com/wall161447783_2956
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
And can't you do that on a good standard soft synth?Z1202 wrote:Musical enough?fluffy_little_something wrote:Abusing a synth, what is the purpose of that? There was a video of a Japanese guy kind of abusing a Minimoog pages ago, but frankly, most of those sounds had no musical value in my view.
Extreme sounds may be of interest to about 1% of synth users, for the rest stuff from Xils, Tal, GForce, U-he etc. will do.
http://vk.com/wall161447783_2956
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
That was done with Reaktor? Wow! I really need to learn how to program that thing. Unfortunately, digging into the core is way beyond my level of programming ability.Z1202 wrote:Some custom DSP in Reaktor Core. Nothing fancy, just some extreme settings. Essentially just the same old square waveform.wagtunes wrote:Cool! What synth was that made with?Z1202 wrote:Musical enough?fluffy_little_something wrote:Abusing a synth, what is the purpose of that? There was a video of a Japanese guy kind of abusing a Minimoog pages ago, but frankly, most of those sounds had no musical value in my view.
Extreme sounds may be of interest to about 1% of synth users, for the rest stuff from Xils, Tal, GForce, U-he etc. will do.
http://vk.com/wall161447783_2956
- Beware the Quoth
- 35424 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Yes, because 'prime time' is so universally defined and agreed upon for bands, especially those who's careers span multiple decades, as is the case for all three acts mentioned as 70s bands.fluffy_little_something wrote:I would say a 70's band is a band whose prime time was in the 70's
So much so noone is allowed to refer to the band by the decade they were formed, lest the 'usual suspect' turn up.
Human League ; formed in the 70's, best album recorded in 1979, absolutely cannot be described as a 70s band.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
