KVR Audio

deastman · Post by **deastman** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:47 pm

This topic is pointless. So stop it.

inkwarp · Post by **inkwarp** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:11 pm

"start stopping, now" -
vic and bob

wagtunes · Post by **wagtunes** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:18 pm

gaf_thit · Post by **gaf_thit** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:20 pm

Just STOP!

mutantdog · Post by **mutantdog** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:42 pm

PC > Mac

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:17 pm

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:55 pm

[DELETED]

Robmobius · Post by **Robmobius** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:58 pm

Don't stop this useful thread... please...

Sampleconstruct · Post by **Sampleconstruct** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:03 pm

Stop stopping each other.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:08 pm

Todays anagram clue is:

Aleatoriac · Post by **Aleatoriac** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:32 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:Todays anagram clue is:

fluffy_little_something · Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:20 pm

2ZrgE wrote:On the one hand, you have a top-notch emulation of a well known, beloved hardware synth used on countless productions.

On the other hand, you have yet another 'top-notch' synth with yet another name/GUI.

Guess which one sells better?

Never forget that those synths aren't produced for fun but for a living.

I don't know which one sells better, frankly. Sylenth for instance has been as successful as it gets in that industry, yet it is not an emulation of any specific synth afaik.
When something is really good, it will sell accordingly. So, if Tal decided to add a second oscillator and envelope and other extras to the U-NO-LX, I assume it would sell better than the pure emulation.

fischkopf · Post by **fischkopf** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:23 pm

mutantdog wrote:PC > Mac

Agreed.

ccDuckett · Post by **ccDuckett** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:46 pm

deastman · Post by **deastman** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:54 pm

Stop It