DeeComp - WOW!!!
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 5641 posts since 15 Dec, 2011
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25007 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Now it only has got an algorithm just everything else out there... that was the main thing which was drawing me in...
-
- KVRer
- 7 posts since 24 Aug, 2015
professional composers don't want cheaper options.TheoM wrote: since you are here, do you think it's perhaps a good idea to address some of the criticism in this topic about the plugin and perhaps tells us why you feel it is worth the price vs cheaper options? Cheers
and VST should be near of musician's idea.
-
- KVRAF
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
Clearly have Elton John in their sights! 
-
- KVRist
- 392 posts since 4 Apr, 2006
I think a lot of the criticism has to do with the fact you're asking for upper commercial prices, when you're an unknown company without a track record to speak of. I recently bought a CLA drum plug-in by WAVES, on sale for a measly $23 dollars, the same plug-in that's $150 when not on sale. WAVES is constantly having sales on their expensive plug-ins at fluctuating price points. I don't understand your logic about pros not wanting cheaper options! That statement is ridiculous.5onar wrote:professional composers don't want cheaper options.TheoM wrote: since you are here, do you think it's perhaps a good idea to address some of the criticism in this topic about the plugin and perhaps tells us why you feel it is worth the price vs cheaper options? Cheers
and VST should be near of musician's idea.
When you consider the commercial products that pros typically use and trust, that have a robust support system in place, can stand behind their products, can be bought in major music stores like Guitar center, Sam Ash, musicians friend, and other music retailers, why would they choose to buy from a small, independent company no one heard of until recently? Why would they pay you $130 for your product instead of Waves or another established company. Well established companies have been closing their businesses and leaving customers hanging with a product they'll never see an update or fix for. Users are cautious and look for a company they feel they can reasonably trust. You have a simple 1 page website with an email as sole contact. Waves have email, phone number, fax, a listed address, and VIP support... something that pros would have a definite need for.
It's certainly not my business to tell you what road to travel- but, In my worthless opinion... you probably shouldn't being aiming for the pros when you haven't built a brand or a name for yourself. 2 pennies thrown in the water.
-
- KVRAF
- 5641 posts since 15 Dec, 2011
You really think that?5onar wrote:professional composers don't want cheaper options.TheoM wrote: since you are here, do you think it's perhaps a good idea to address some of the criticism in this topic about the plugin and perhaps tells us why you feel it is worth the price vs cheaper options? Cheers
and VST should be near of musician's idea.
I was under the impression that they want amazing gear for free...
-
- KVRist
- 392 posts since 4 Apr, 2006
I don't believe there's anything that really supports that angle. I think the developer is simply charging what he feels his product is worth to him. Nothing wrong with the price-if people are willing to pay it. Seems to me, that products are submitted to KVR in order for them to be posted here. With that in mind, the developer knows KVR isn't a Japanese site, so that seems to mute the notion of price based on fans and a Japanese market.pottering wrote:Seems this comp was custom made for a Japanese band, and priced for its fans and the Japanese market (VSTs cost more there).