Alchemy available in logic now

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Alchemy Logic Pro

Post

Is it much different from IK Multimedia ?

Post

Cinebient wrote:
Tomgu wrote:What does B stand for? :)
....maybe Ben...... :D
lol disgusting :hihi:

Post

My first Alchemy 2-pad, a little impro, adding Macro automation in a second pass. I like the filters and the granular engine still works well for paddy stuff now that we have multiple grain streams which can be offset.



EDIT:
and to mention the new waveshaper in the FX section, very versatile and it sounds good.

Post

Sampleconstruct wrote:My first Alchemy 2-pad, a little impro, adding Macro automation in a second pass. I like the filters and the granular engine still works well for paddy stuff now that we have multiple grain streams which can be offset.



EDIT:
and to mention the new waveshaper in the FX section, very versatile and it sounds good.
Yay!

Post

Cool stuff Simon, looks like the new Applechemy is not that bad afterall!

Post

Neon Breath wrote:Cool stuff Simon, looks like the new Applechemy is not that bad afterall!
Cheers, Seb - I'm picking out my raisins from the cake and I am discovering some things too, I've had my rant so now it's time to look ahead.

Post

Sampleconstruct wrote:
Neon Breath wrote:Cool stuff Simon, looks like the new Applechemy is not that bad afterall!
Cheers, Seb - I'm picking out my raisins from the cake and I am discovering some things too, I've had my rant so now it's time to look ahead.
Way to go man :tu:

If I was using Logic, I would definitely jump on it and start digging into it. Don’t think this ‘update’ will make me switch DAW and buy Logic just for it, but still it sounds and looks pretty cool.

Have fun with it guys!

Post

Sampleconstruct wrote:I've had my rant so now it's time to look ahead.
I'm so glad to read this! :clap:

Post

VitaminD wrote:
Sampleconstruct wrote:I've had my rant so now it's time to look ahead.
I'm so glad to read this! :clap:
:tu: :party:

Post

Is it really Alchemy 2?

Post

tehlord wrote:Is it really Alchemy 2?
Was Windows 95 Windows 4 ?

Post

Numanoid wrote:
tehlord wrote:Is it really Alchemy 2?
Was Windows 95 Windows 4 ?
Did you get enough hugs as a child?

Post

To quote Ms. Tina Turner: What's love got to do with it? :hihi:

I would say that Windows 95 sort of was Windows 4 but not really as they ditched the numbering they had used.

There were 486 processors, then we got pentium, maybe that was like 586 processors, but not really as they ditched the numbering they had used

There was Alchemy 1.5, then Logic users got Applchemy, so is that really Alchemy 2, maybe, but not really as they have ditched the numbering they had used.

Post

Sampleconstruct wrote:
Neon Breath wrote:Cool stuff Simon, looks like the new Applechemy is not that bad afterall!
Cheers, Seb - I'm picking out my raisins from the cake and I am discovering some things too, I've had my rant so now it's time to look ahead.
Hence the 'yay!". It will be great to see what you come up with. Personally I am finding lots to like about the new version even if the spectral editor is still a pain to use.

Post

tehlord wrote:Is it really Alchemy 2?
Yes

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”