please bare with me, as I don't have Falcon... Im pre-sales here, trying to work out if to buy before the 9thThomasHelzle wrote:@thetechnobear
Little thought experiment:
You can use pitch per midi channel, so that one axis is possible to sort via Lua as I understand it. Let's call it X.
You have Poly AT, which works right away as Y.
Since Polyphonic AT is per channel, you could in theory translate your Z to another channel of Poly AT somehow externally.
That would give you the ability to work with only two programs in Falcon, each with it's own Poly AT source (one of which is originally Timbre).
So you would not have all three expressions in both programs, but a separate Poly AT in each.
I would expect that you can do a lot with this already when layering things and it wouldn't need you to duplicate everything, the two programs could form one voice together.
I still don't have an MPE instrument, but would such a setup not work in many cases?
Hopefully Falcon will support full MPE and more per-voice modulations in the future...
Cheers,
Tom
k... so what your saying is having two parts (=programs in Falcon?) which are layered one of which is modulating with one axis and the other the other axis (both using poly pressure as a modulator, and with different targets)
hmm...its an interesting idea... I've not experimented much with layer, but i think your right it would work, and create some interesting sounds.
this could be taken in an alternative 'direction' too, oliver mentioned volume could be modulated per voice directly by the script, this means you could use Y as a crossfade between the two layers.
MPE: yeah, Id love it to be MPE compliant... of at least support voice per channel i.e. to allow you to send each CC to each voice independently to be modulation source.... or do like bitwig, and as well as polyAT have a Poly Timbre...
perhaps in a future update
thanks @mdsp thats quite promising, its still leaving some cpu for the voices
