Actually it was kind of a refreshing read you don't see often around those places. Sounded like an actual person with an identitymcc> wrote:so here i am talking about music a bit.
sorry if that bugs anyone : G
808 posts I'd for sure stop there.
Must read the manual someday heheshroom81 wrote:liv
KVRian
808 posts since 26 Feb
You do realize you must never post again right ?
Like The Mangle?Neon Breath wrote: Moved on with other better sounding synths, with better workflow, more user friendly interfaces & more modern tools.
I'm so curious what you think about Mangle versus Granite. Mangle has been really buggy for me and I'm on the fence about Granite. I love Granite's interface, especially how you can so easily modulate the knobs on-screen.Neon Breath wrote:Mangle...
Alchemy...
Padshop...
Granite...
Very different synths. For me it's a worflow VS sound. If you aim for a very dense, lush and prestine sound, go with Mangle, one of the best sounding granular synths at the moment imo. But if you aim for the worflow and very unique modulation possibilities, go with Granite. It definitly sounds rougher and choppier than Mangle, but its unique recordable modulation rings make it unique and very organic sounding despite its raw sound. Hope than helps a bit!Igor Amos wrote:I'm so curious what you think about Mangle versus Granite. Mangle has been really buggy for me and I'm on the fence about Granite. I love Granite's interface, especially how you can so easily modulate the knobs on-screen.Neon Breath wrote:Mangle...
Alchemy...
Padshop...
Granite...
I'll be sure to do that, man is a legend around here these days. There's even a beer in his name being made nowliv wrote: Please say hi to Lars Lagerbäck.
Yes it does! thanks so much. I heard similar things from others so it helps to have confirmation on its general qualities!!Neon Breath wrote:Very different synths. For me it's a worflow VS sound. If you aim for a very dense, lush and prestine sound, go with Mangle, one of the best sounding granular synths at the moment imo. But if you aim for the worflow and very unique modulation possibilities, go with Granite. It definitly sounds rougher and choppier than Mangle, but its unique recordable modulation rings make it unique and very organic sounding despite its raw sound. Hope than helps a bit!Igor Amos wrote:I'm so curious what you think about Mangle versus Granite. Mangle has been really buggy for me and I'm on the fence about Granite. I love Granite's interface, especially how you can so easily modulate the knobs on-screen.Neon Breath wrote:Mangle...
Alchemy...
Padshop...
Granite...
Igor Amos wrote:Yes it does! thanks so much. I heard similar things from others so it helps to have confirmation on its general qualities!!Neon Breath wrote:Very different synths. For me it's a worflow VS sound. If you aim for a very dense, lush and prestine sound, go with Mangle, one of the best sounding granular synths at the moment imo. But if you aim for the worflow and very unique modulation possibilities, go with Granite. It definitly sounds rougher and choppier than Mangle, but its unique recordable modulation rings make it unique and very organic sounding despite its raw sound. Hope than helps a bit!Igor Amos wrote:I'm so curious what you think about Mangle versus Granite. Mangle has been really buggy for me and I'm on the fence about Granite. I love Granite's interface, especially how you can so easily modulate the knobs on-screen.Neon Breath wrote:Mangle...
Alchemy...
Padshop...
Granite...
Mostly, not totally.loachm wrote:...this list looks a bit like you've been using Absynth as a one-trick-granular-pony...Neon Breath wrote:Mangle...
Alchemy...
Padshop...
Granite...
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
