This explains a lot about Cakewalk/Sonar
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
I was talking about Doktor Avalanche (CakeAlex) - NOT BITFLIPPER! Bit is a great guy and very smart. Sorry if I was unclear.jinotsuh wrote:hmmm, I may be misunderstanding something here, but when the previous poster mentioned bitflipper and then you said "The same guy that you are talking about . . . " I don't think that you are talking about the same person, vintagevibe I believe you are talking about Doktor Avalanche (CakeAlex) would I be right, not bitflipper ? I have always found bitflipper to be just about the pick of the bunch when it comes to hosts, as for Doktor Avalanche, he is a pita.vintagevibe wrote:chrisby wrote: to my defense was called "bitflipper" or something if I remember.
The same guy that you are talking about gets on and starts basically reciting a call center script of things to do that have absolutely nothing to do with my issue. He then get's all snooty an arrogant when he you don't follow his instructions. More than just a waste of time it's actually pretty insulting. Then of course the rest of the "gang" chimes in that it's not a Sonar problem yada yada yada ad nauseum. This is the standard thread on the Sonar forum and is not an anomaly. So with this situation going on what does Cakewalk do ... they make him a moderator.He eventually got fired from it so he changed his name and continues with "business as usual". Anyway it's not just him it's all the main people who use the forum as their social life that have turned it into what it is. The sad thing is that Craig encourages it and joins in.
I agree with everything else you say, especially it is never Sonars fault etc etc
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
You are correct. I was definitely not talking about bitflipper.jsp1979 wrote:Agree. The person cannot possibly be talking about bitflipper. He's one of the kindest, most laidback, helpful posters that I've ever met on any audio forum.flugel45 wrote:Definitely not bitflipper. Bitflipper is about as low key as they come, and he has never changed his name -- he is still a moderator.
He also writes helpful articles for soundbytes magazine.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
dupe
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
incubus wrote:Is this still going on?
20-40% better awaits you.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
Not trying to! The forum gods must be angry.pwal wrote:are you simulating the cake forum with these dupes?vintagevibe wrote:dupe
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 153 posts since 4 May, 2007
That thread will survive the nuclear holocaust.incubus wrote:Still the greatest thread eva!
-
- KVRist
- 46 posts since 15 Mar, 2012
Kudos to the OP and KVRAKJ wrote:this thread explains a lot about KVR
Unbiased, constructive criticism based on long-term experience and facts.
People have their own factual opinions, and Internet laws should be respected. This message is in general and therefore, not intended to offend anyone but as a reminder to at least respect others and their rights. Peace
-
Hank the Knife Hank the Knife https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=362962
- Banned
- 301 posts since 16 Jul, 2015 from Where You Cannot Scream
Proclaiming a negative propaganda (the 'blame' is on the negative comments directed at Sonar) doesn't work in the long run as well. Even amongst mobsters it doesn't work in the long run... in any way: Craig Anderton wasn't trained at the Vatican 
-
- KVRAF
- 2306 posts since 27 Jan, 2011
From Cakewalk's CTO, of all people, in the aforementioned Sonar forum thread:
"TBH I seriously doubt that some of the people who obsess about bug fixes actually make any music themselves
Music is the whole point of buying and using this software, not keeping track of bugs.
Write some songs or talk about how you are making music with SONAR instead, which is the primary objective of this forum. It will be way more valuable to others than obsessing about the software. "
A gift to the haters, truly worth 1000 rants. And not so encouraging to those of us on the fence, that this richly-spec'd but rather buggy software will improve.
"TBH I seriously doubt that some of the people who obsess about bug fixes actually make any music themselves
Write some songs or talk about how you are making music with SONAR instead, which is the primary objective of this forum. It will be way more valuable to others than obsessing about the software. "
A gift to the haters, truly worth 1000 rants. And not so encouraging to those of us on the fence, that this richly-spec'd but rather buggy software will improve.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK
Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood
Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood
-
- KVRAF
- 6159 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
I have no dog in this fight. I don't own or use Sonar and never have. However, it's very clear to me, reading that comment, that some people have real issues understanding plain English and will take offense at almost anything.
That quote is quite literally true, for almost if not all daw products. That "some" (look that word up in Webster's) people who go on these crusades about things (bugs, features) aren't making music, or much. In fact, "some" of them actually quite literally don't and have never even legally owned some of the products they crusade against.
Just because that's quite literally true for "some" doesn't mean he meant "everybody making bug reports", or eveyone complaining about a bug.
He's right. Of the people complaining most on any daw forum, some of them are complaining just to complain and aren't doing anything of consequence musically if at all while shouting how critical everything is.
The real problem is that it's often enough hard to know which ones those actually are. But yeah, still not good PR to say thise things out loud.
That quote is quite literally true, for almost if not all daw products. That "some" (look that word up in Webster's) people who go on these crusades about things (bugs, features) aren't making music, or much. In fact, "some" of them actually quite literally don't and have never even legally owned some of the products they crusade against.
Just because that's quite literally true for "some" doesn't mean he meant "everybody making bug reports", or eveyone complaining about a bug.
He's right. Of the people complaining most on any daw forum, some of them are complaining just to complain and aren't doing anything of consequence musically if at all while shouting how critical everything is.
The real problem is that it's often enough hard to know which ones those actually are. But yeah, still not good PR to say thise things out loud.
Last edited by LawrenceF on Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.