Ok, so it sounds like everything else but with no hi hats.....excuse me, samples that "emulate" hi hats.do_androids_dream wrote:There's plenty of techno tracks that don't make use of a hihat but you're going to have to go on a trawling mission to find them. It's not like there's a sub-genre that doesn't use hihatsI guess you're more talking about the ever present syncopated hat?
Here's a favourite of mine, off the top of my head, that's not hihat heavy.
genres, ugh. hi-hats, yuck.
-
- Banned
- 5357 posts since 7 May, 2015
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 8082 posts since 9 Jan, 2003 from Saint Louis MO
Yeah, I am thinking about that. I just set myself up with a new band name and don't know what I'm going to do with itincubus wrote:b) Or, make your ownWouldn't be very hard to come up with some snazzy stuff.
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Confused!incubus wrote:Ok, so it sounds like everything else but with no hi hats.....excuse me, samples that "emulate" hi hats.do_androids_dream wrote:There's plenty of techno tracks that don't make use of a hihat but you're going to have to go on a trawling mission to find them. It's not like there's a sub-genre that doesn't use hihatsI guess you're more talking about the ever present syncopated hat?
Here's a favourite of mine, off the top of my head, that's not hihat heavy.
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
The thing with hihats - in any genre - is that it's one of the major ways to generate pace and excitement in a rhythm - a role that's normally fulfilled by a high frequency component. Kind of unavoidable in some ways.. There are artists who use percussion in more creative ways in 4 to the floor. The best example I can think of is Ricardo Villalobos - maybe check him out (although be careful not to dismiss him too quick - his music does vary quite a bit and takes a while to get into and 'get' - like all good music
).
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
I know. It's all jus' pressin' buttons innit!incubus wrote:b) Or, make your ownWouldn't be very hard to come up with some snazzy stuff.
-
- Banned
- 5357 posts since 7 May, 2015
But here's a fact, not trying to be a snob or whatever. I can emulate that stuff pretty easily, and there is nothing wrong with that. Not a shitload of variation.do_androids_dream wrote:I know. It's all jus' pressin' buttons innit!incubus wrote:b) Or, make your ownWouldn't be very hard to come up with some snazzy stuff.
Not being critical of the genre. I like it just fine. I like making it. But it's not Beethoven. We should all post our stuff and laugh at (I mean encourage) each other
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Yeah I was just poking a bit of fun there. It's something I used to hear people say when any kind of electronic music was within earshot (like my grandparents when I was little lol). It isn't Beethoven but it's much harder than you think to make very minimally composed/arranged music. The best can make very sparse components sound very interesting. I put Mike Parker in that category - able to make little techno worlds out of just a few things.incubus wrote:But here's a fact, not trying to be a snob or whatever. I can emulate that stuff pretty easily, and there is nothing wrong with that. Not a shitload of variation.do_androids_dream wrote:I know. It's all jus' pressin' buttons innit!incubus wrote:b) Or, make your ownWouldn't be very hard to come up with some snazzy stuff.
Not being critical of the genre. I like it just fine. I like making it. But it's not Beethoven. We should all post our stuff and laugh at (I mean encourage) each other
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
i remember old what's his face writing the computer music articles diatribe vs. hats on 16ths.. why invalidate a simple form.. old people have different ears/brain than young people, maybe it just takes 30 years to get tired of hihats.. but young people, i reckon, still appreciate those overt attention steerers.do_androids_dream wrote:The thing with hihats - in any genre - is that it's one of the major ways to generate pace and excitement in a rhythm - a role that's normally fulfilled by a high frequency component. Kind of unavoidable in some ways..
i confronted this notion making my recent album(s), which is stripped "gangsta rap", most of the sounds are novel sounds produced by tearing wavs apart in adze, so there are plenty of "sounds with high frequencies" that aren't closed hats. most of the songs in the first volume still have a tap on second 8ths throughout.. but mixed down, because it's loud music.
..so for this old guy trying to make something relatively entertaining for hisself, hats are pretty much out. but the kicks will still tear the shit out of your ears.
https://xoxos.bandcamp.com/album/dope-beats-for-suckers
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.