Blue Cat's PatchWork 1.7 Available, with Ext. Sidechain, Aux Outputs and Plug-In I/O Routing
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 11295 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Anyone else on Mac (AU version) getting UI drawing glitches?


- KVRAF
- 11295 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Or I should also ask... IS this also an issue on the Mac VST version?
-
- KVRian
- 1125 posts since 29 Sep, 2013
I have to close and re-open the GUI on a number of their plugins to switch to one of the larger preset sizes. This may well be a Cubase-specific issue.
In rotation here: Helios- Eingya
- KVRAF
- 5377 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
Not in 10.8.5, but as we know Apple breaks compatibility with each new version, so YVMV!elxsound wrote:IS this also an issue on the Mac VST version?
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W
Y O U R
F L O W
- KVRAF
- 11295 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Hmmm. I'll download the VST version next.Michael L wrote:Not in 10.8.5, but as we know Apple breaks compatibility with each new version, so YVMV!elxsound wrote:IS this also an issue on the Mac VST version?
I'm on 10.10.5 now and well aware of those awesome breaks!
- KVRAF
- 11295 posts since 18 Aug, 2007 from NYC
Haha... Hiding might not be such a bad thing!
Well, I think you'd be happy to know that the VST version is indeed stable compared to the AU version. I mean... No drawing issues.
I am disappointed that there's no browser hierarchy... Loading a plugin (au or vst) brings you to the actual Finder folder. This is much cleaner in Magma.
This is going to be a tough decision (between Magma and PatchWork).
Great features in PatchWork but in order to be quick, an organized browser is extremely helpful.
Well, I think you'd be happy to know that the VST version is indeed stable compared to the AU version. I mean... No drawing issues.
I am disappointed that there's no browser hierarchy... Loading a plugin (au or vst) brings you to the actual Finder folder. This is much cleaner in Magma.
This is going to be a tough decision (between Magma and PatchWork).
Great features in PatchWork but in order to be quick, an organized browser is extremely helpful.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12438 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
For me, there's a few features which would really take Patchwork to the next level:
1. Drag and drop to relocate effects
2. Better/faster plugin browsing (even if that means having to do an occasional scan)
3. A Dry/Wet knob for each plugin (for effects that don't already have it)
4. Maybe an option/button to show the signal flow on the UI (every now and then I open the manual to double check the flow, would be nice to have the ability to see it on the UI)
5. Better User Preset Browsing (a folder for User Presets allowing for sub-folders would be great)
6. A Dry/Wet knob for each section of the UI (i.e. allow for different dry/wet settings for the Pre, Parallel, and Post paths so the Pre path could be at 50% wet if I wanted, but the global dry/wet could be 100%)
7. Double click a slot with a plugin to open the UI (this would be easier than having to hit that little box or use the right+click menu)
Maybe even in a Patchwork 2.0...
8. The ability to split the audio stream into different channels (L and R, Mid and Side, different frequency crossovers).
9. A large selection of included multi-effects to be used as basic building blocks (chorus, flange, delay, reverb, phaser, filters compression, EQ, etc.)
1. Drag and drop to relocate effects
2. Better/faster plugin browsing (even if that means having to do an occasional scan)
3. A Dry/Wet knob for each plugin (for effects that don't already have it)
4. Maybe an option/button to show the signal flow on the UI (every now and then I open the manual to double check the flow, would be nice to have the ability to see it on the UI)
5. Better User Preset Browsing (a folder for User Presets allowing for sub-folders would be great)
6. A Dry/Wet knob for each section of the UI (i.e. allow for different dry/wet settings for the Pre, Parallel, and Post paths so the Pre path could be at 50% wet if I wanted, but the global dry/wet could be 100%)
7. Double click a slot with a plugin to open the UI (this would be easier than having to hit that little box or use the right+click menu)
Maybe even in a Patchwork 2.0...
8. The ability to split the audio stream into different channels (L and R, Mid and Side, different frequency crossovers).
9. A large selection of included multi-effects to be used as basic building blocks (chorus, flange, delay, reverb, phaser, filters compression, EQ, etc.)
Last edited by Funkybot's Evil Twin on Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 2673 posts since 18 Mar, 2006 from The Void
I would be straight on this if it also was capable of bridging between 32bit/64bit.
Unfortunately, without that, it's yet another tool that would 'almost' be useful.
Unfortunately, without that, it's yet another tool that would 'almost' be useful.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12438 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
That's like saying a hammer is "almost useful" because it makes a terrible screwdriver. Patchwork was never meant to replace something like J-Bridge.koalaboy wrote:I would be straight on this if it also was capable of bridging between 32bit/64bit.
Unfortunately, without that, it's yet another tool that would 'almost' be useful.
- KVRAF
- 2673 posts since 18 Mar, 2006 from The Void
It's a "Universal plugin patchbay". Sounds to me like it should be able to host all of my plugins, and patch them together.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:That's like saying a hammer is "almost useful" because it makes a terrible screwdriver. Patchwork was never meant to replace something like J-Bridge.koalaboy wrote:I would be straight on this if it also was capable of bridging between 32bit/64bit.
Unfortunately, without that, it's yet another tool that would 'almost' be useful.
I realise it does many things very well. I would just like it to be able to bridge - it would take it 'to the next level' as you say.
Just because you don't need bridging, doesn't mean it's not a really useful part of a Universal plugin patchbay.
-
- KVRer
- 5 posts since 10 Dec, 2015
Obvious troll is obvious. Why are you even commenting on the release thread? Sure, it'd be nice if it supported 32bit-to-64bit bridging. It'd also be nice if it supported VST3 plugins and worked an RTAS/AAX DSP host too. And if it made me a coffee while my Pro Tools session was doing an online bounce, then I might just consider renting it for a couple of hours possibly on occasion. But it is a $99 plugin.koalaboy wrote:I would be straight on this if it also was capable of bridging between 32bit/64bit.
Unfortunately, without that, it's yet another tool that would 'almost' be useful.
I will concede that the description could be more accurate. When I purchased it, I expected Patchwork would host VST3 as well as VST2, because there is no explicit mention of versions in the product description or even the manual.koalaboy wrote:Just because you don't need bridging, doesn't mean it's not a really useful part of a Universal plugin patchbay.
1. I second this request. Would be very handy.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:For me, there's a few features which would really take Patchwork to the next level:
1. Drag and drop to relocate effects
3. A Dry/Wet knob for each plugin (for effects that don't already have it)
4. Maybe an option/button to show the signal flow on the UI (every now and then I open the manual to double check the flow, would be nice to have the ability to see it on the UI)
6. A Dry/Wet knob for each section of the UI
8. The ability to split the audio stream into different channels (L and R, Mid and Side, different frequency crossovers).
9. A large selection of included multi-effects to be used as basic building blocks (chorus, flange, delay, reverb, phaser, filters compression, EQ, etc.)
3/6. Can be achieved by use of Aux channels in your DAW. Though it does depend on how much control you need over each individual plugin.
4. I may be misunderstanding you, but it seems pretty intuitive to me. Basically, follow the blue lines left to right. Single input source comes in to Pre, split out to parallel chain rows, goes out to Post in either Average or Sum mode, depending on the setting of the drop-down box.
8. Splitting the input signal into component channels is more something the DAW should handle, even if you need multiple instances of Patchwork.
9. Uhh ... yeah, not for a $99 product.
If I read between the lines here, with your 3, 6 and 9, it looks like you're trying to use Patchwork as a DAW—trying to make it handle all your channels and routing, probably as the standalone app.
