Whatever, those soft does sell, Cubase is even industry standard, so why should anyone at Steinberg want to change things?robotmonkey wrote:What is interesting about that is how far can you go without making it too costly when it comes to development time, system resources and annoyance to the users. Some of the music software has supposedly over 50% of it's code devoted to CP. That is an huge waste of system resources. I'm glad that Urs can do his CP with only couple of lines but the above mentioned Cubase is a good example how CP could severely affect performance and stability. And it's not the only one as there are know to be other plugins out there of which have half of its size taken up by CP code. Consider a ~60mb plugin which has ~30mb of CP code. That is a huge waste of computing resources for paying users if one loads many instances of such plugins.Lotuzia wrote:101% false. You seem to assume that companies using Ilok can't cumulate anti-piracy methods, in addition to Ilok. And should rely exclusively on Ilok. This is not exact : I know at least one company that does exactly that. And another one implementing it. Cumulating such systems might be the better solution. At the very least, it's a method that could be considered.Urs wrote:
... We have a concept of dealing with piracy once it happens. People who use iLok don't.
There are many methods to fight p.racy. Some are hybrids. World is not black n white.
Buy, or don't buy, very easy alternatives.