Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there.
For $500 I'd still buy it even if it was monophonic
Just to be clear, if it is paraphonic that pertains to the filter and not the oscillator/voices. There's speculation that there's just a single analog filter for all four voices, which would then make it paraphonic. But it still remains to be confirmed by Korg directly as this PlugInGuru guys leaves very strange statements (see my previous post).tehlord wrote:Well the infomation I glean from that video is that it is 4 oscillators. Like I said if that's not the case then all the better.
Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there.
For $500 I'd still buy it even if it was monophonic
What he describes here isn't the same thing as paraphonic, he just says that you can't have one voice with one filter settings and then another sound with another filter setting (i.e. layering). Most analog polyphonic synths today tend to have a shared control for the cutoff and resonance, and not a separate control per voice.eXode wrote:Also, the subject on it being paraphonic is kind of unclear, because this PlugInGuru guy first said it was paraphonic, but then he also said this:
"I have one here next to me - it's a single filter / Amp section in the analog domain. You can't have one sound with one filter setting and another sound with a different filter setting at the same time. Only 1 filter/EG setting affecting the sound. And it's duophonic - not paraphonic (2 notes, ability to detune but it's playing the same waveforms)."
Nowhyterabbyt wrote:
So for those who are saying it only has 4 oscillators, then if there's a mixer for VCO1 vs VCO2 v Noise, and any 4-voice mode uses 'all' 4 oscillators, could you explain why you think the panel is laid out for 2 VCO's and how you think the 'chord' and 'delay' voice modes are going to work properly for patches with noise?
Yes, looks like one random guy said 'oh, its undoubtedly paraphonic' out of nowhere, and with no justification or evidence.tehlord wrote:Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there
Yeah, exactly; they're not multitimbral. That doesnt mean they are paraphonic.eXode wrote:What he describes here isn't the same thing as paraphonic, he just says that you can't have one voice with one filter settings and then another sound with another filter setting (i.e. layering). Most analog polyphonic synths today tend to have a shared control for the cutoff and resonance, and not a separate control per voice.eXode wrote:Also, the subject on it being paraphonic is kind of unclear, because this PlugInGuru guy first said it was paraphonic, but then he also said this:
"I have one here next to me - it's a single filter / Amp section in the analog domain. You can't have one sound with one filter setting and another sound with a different filter setting at the same time. Only 1 filter/EG setting affecting the sound. And it's duophonic - not paraphonic (2 notes, ability to detune but it's playing the same waveforms)."
Well there's more 'evidence' to it than that.whyterabbyt wrote:Yes, looks like one random guy said 'oh, its undoubtedly paraphonic' out of nowhere, and with no justification or evidence.tehlord wrote:Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there
Clearly proof enough for some.
And yet noone will actually provide it.tehlord wrote:Well there's more 'evidence' to it than that.whyterabbyt wrote:Yes, looks like one random guy said 'oh, its undoubtedly paraphonic' out of nowhere, and with no justification or evidence.tehlord wrote:Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there
Clearly proof enough for some.
So the evidence you say exists, but havent posted was bollocks anyway?Apparently Mr Plugin Guru has corrected himself on his own youtube video by saying it has one filter per voice etc etc.
Internet reasons.whyterabbyt wrote:And yet noone will actually provide it.tehlord wrote:Well there's more 'evidence' to it than that.whyterabbyt wrote:Yes, looks like one random guy said 'oh, its undoubtedly paraphonic' out of nowhere, and with no justification or evidence.tehlord wrote:Actually I recall seeing a post over at Gearslutz talking about it being paraphonic too, but to be honest I'm only skim reading anything over there
Clearly proof enough for some.
So the evidence you say exists, but havent posted was bollocks anyway?Apparently Mr Plugin Guru has corrected himself on his own youtube video by saying it has one filter per voice etc etc.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026