Korg Minilogue

[eXode]

What makes you think that's the guy who said it at Gearslutz?

And PluginGuru has recanted the paraphonic comment.

Sorry, I thought you meant where the claim came from. The claim came from PlugInGuru (among others), and he clearly has one in possession. I know that he clarified his earlier posts to say that it is indeed 1 filter per voice.

I think we can all agree on that information has been confusing, at best.

[whyterabbyt]

What makes you think that's the guy who said it at Gearslutz?

And PluginGuru has recanted the paraphonic comment.

Sorry, I thought you meant where the claim came from. The claim came from PlugInGuru (among others), and he clearly has one in possession. I know that he clarified his earlier posts to say that it is indeed 1 filter per voice.

I can see people referring to him saying that at Gearslutz since the video went up today, but the first guy to claim it at Gearslutz is someone else entirely, who did so 5 days ago.

[SLiC]

Talk about arguing about minutia....

''Pseudo Polyphonic'', a number of Oscillators but only one Filter for all- lots of synths work like this including the Korg Poly 800 (and the DSI Pro 2 !!)

Its sounds great, the price point is amazing. Be happy.

[EvilDragon]

" radiokoala 39 minutes ago
If it were paraphonic, it would be impossible for it to have 'sidechain' voice mode, where previously held notes get less loud as you play solo on top of them. This means every part has its own VCA and it's a poly."

[SLiC]

" radiokoala 39 minutes ago
If it were paraphonic, it would be impossible for it to have 'sidechain' voice mode, where previously held notes get less loud as you play solo on top of them. This means every part has its own VCA and it's a poly."

I think by definition its ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' as per my post above, a number of Oscillators, VCA;s etc but only one Filter for all, so an overall voice shaping. Like I said, that feature is on some amazing (and expensive) synths, not necessarily a bad thing, but I guess we are at that stage where people are looking for something to be wrong with it!

[Daags]

sounds great. i'm interested. would have preferred at least six voices though. fingers crossed for a module version.

saw someone say it will be 600 euros, 500 dollars ? can anyone confirm the euro price ?

[whyterabbyt]

" radiokoala 39 minutes ago
If it were paraphonic, it would be impossible for it to have 'sidechain' voice mode, where previously held notes get less loud as you play solo on top of them. This means every part has its own VCA and it's a poly."

I think by definition its ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' as per my post above, a number of Oscillators, VCA;s etc but only one Filter for all

So basically, what Paraphonic actually gets used to describe, except with you introducing the entirely new term ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' instead, just for the hell of it.
Glad you could manage to make things more convoluted.

[tehlord]

It's pedantaphonic

[whyterabbyt]

It's pedantaphonic

No, that would be 5 voices.

[SLiC]

" radiokoala 39 minutes ago
If it were paraphonic, it would be impossible for it to have 'sidechain' voice mode, where previously held notes get less loud as you play solo on top of them. This means every part has its own VCA and it's a poly."

I think by definition its ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' as per my post above, a number of Oscillators, VCA;s etc but only one Filter for all

So basically, what Paraphonic actually gets used to describe, except with you introducing the entirely new term ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' instead, just for the hell of it.
Glad you could manage to make things more convoluted.

I'm here to help

By definition as it shares a common filter it is parphonic, but then so is the DSI Pro 2... I think people are getting confused between the literal definition of paraphonic and (from what I read) people thinking there will not be 4 notes at the same time each built from 2 oscillators with its own VCA etc (no voice stealing). It is just the filter that's common, not one filter per voice...and moist people put a final filter on all of the voices to blend anyway.

PS I don't claim to have made up ''Pseudo Polyphonic'' it was the term coined for the Korg Poly 800

Hope that clears things up

[EvilDragon]

So, what if it DOES NOT share a common filter, and it has filter per voice, just like PluginGuru said?

[SLiC]

So, what if it DOES NOT share a common filter, and it has filter per voice, just like PluginGuru said?

Then the argument is mute and its is not paraphonic, psudo paraphonic, its just polyphonic! I am sure then people will try to find something else to go at, let endless encoders or the wrong type of wood

I am pretty amazed by the ability to record knob movement in the arp, I wonder if its sending CC so it can be recorded in a DAW and operate as a controller? I wonder if it can parameter lock (may give my A4 a run for its money!)

Need a really in depth review!

[whyterabbyt]

So, what if it DOES NOT share a common filter, and it has filter per voice, just like PluginGuru said?

Then the argument is mute

[pedantophonic] moot [/pedantophonic]

pthththt

[EvilDragon]

Of course it is polyphonic! It has velocity sensitivity switch in the filter section - that switch would make NO sense at all in a paraphonic synth!


It's polyphonic.

[Daags]

So, what if it DOES NOT share a common filter, and it has filter per voice, just like PluginGuru said?

then higson boson particles will explode out of shy's eyeballs like some kind of quantum party popper. the universe will subsequently swallow itself whole, and the multiverse will sigh in relief.

inb4 some physics dweeb points out the impossibility of this scenario.