Guitar Plug-ins Amplesoft vs Ilya Efimov?

Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

lingyai wrote:
Syncopator wrote:
lingyai wrote:As all of the instruments here are sample libraries, shouldn't this be in the sample library sub-forum?

Of not, can someone please explain how the categories work here?
The forum descriptions state:

Instruments: VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Instruments discussion
Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries: Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)

Since these are Kontakt libraries and since Kontakt is both a virtual instrument and a sampler, this discussion technically fits within either category. Does it really matter?

Back on topic: Would love to hear anyone's new thoughts on these guitar libraries!
No need to be so dismissive , it's not an objection to a mere technicality. It does matter actually in that, because 99% of Kontakt library discussions here take place in the sampling forum, that is where people would expect to look for them. (If you'd like to read people's opinions about these over the past year, you will find them there. Tr
Anyways, it's not all about you, who's already found this thread. It's a find-ability thing for ... you know... other people. Remember them?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK

Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood

Post

lingyai wrote:
lingyai wrote:
Syncopator wrote:
lingyai wrote:As all of the instruments here are sample libraries, shouldn't this be in the sample library sub-forum?

Of not, can someone please explain how the categories work here?
The forum descriptions state:

Instruments: VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Instruments discussion
Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries: Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)

Since these are Kontakt libraries and since Kontakt is both a virtual instrument and a sampler, this discussion technically fits within either category. Does it really matter?

Back on topic: Would love to hear anyone's new thoughts on these guitar libraries!
No need to be so dismissive , it's not an objection to a mere technicality. It does matter actually in that, because 99% of Kontakt library discussions here take place in the sampling forum, that is where people would expect to look for them. (If you'd like to read people's opinions about these over the past year, you will find them there. Tr
Anyways, it's not all about you, who's already found this thread. It's a find-ability thing for ... you know... other people. Remember them?
Wow.

I took the time to post the forum descriptions and to give a plausible explanation for the inclusion of this question in this forum! Yet, you're now accusing me of thinking it's "all about me."

No good deed goes unpunished, right?

And regarding the "find-ability thing," you seem to be implying that I have special "finding powers" that no one else has, which I assure you is not the case. I simply did a search for "guitar libraries" and found this thread.

What prevents other people — whom I clearly do remember, as they're the ones for whom I previously cited the descriptions of the two forums — from searching for and finding this thread? I found the thread. You found the thread!

So, again, since the thread is findable, and since it can quite easily be shown to belong in either forum, I asked, "Does it really matter?" Because there's a little feature called search that allows you to find pretty much anything. You might try it sometime. (Oh, that's right! You already did!) Then you created a problem that didn't exist by complaining about the location of the thread — a thread that I didn't create, but for which I searched — and found — just. like. you. :)
Last edited by Syncopator on Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Post

I don't know the protocol here, but if it's possible for the moderators to remove this unnecessary and distracting detour from the actual topic, that would be awesome. All I wanted to do was talk about guitar libraries. :)

Post

Syncopator wrote:I don't know the protocol here, but if it's possible for the moderators to remove this unnecessary and distracting detour from the actual topic, that would be awesome. All I wanted to do was talk about guitar libraries. :)
Or you could just start a new thread in the Sampler (etc.) sub-forum and lock this one.
No need to depend on the moderators. JDIY! :)

Post

BBFG# wrote:
Syncopator wrote:I don't know the protocol here, but if it's possible for the moderators to remove this unnecessary and distracting detour from the actual topic, that would be awesome. All I wanted to do was talk about guitar libraries. :)
Or you could just start a new thread in the Sampler (etc.) sub-forum and lock this one.
No need to depend on the moderators. JDIY! :)
I don't believe it's possible to (nor would I want to) lock a thread that I didn't start. :)

Post

Refocusing:

Nearly a year after this thread was started (by someone else), I'm curious if anyone has additional thoughts about these guitar libraries (some of which have been updated — e.g., RealGuitar *4*).

Based upon previous comments, the favorites tend to be (in no particular order):
- Orangetree
- RealGuitar (was v3, now v4)

How do they compare with:
- Indiginus (which has some amazing demos)

Less-frequently mentioned:
- Efimov
- Pettinhouse

Any new thoughts, regarding (a) the most convincing sound and especially (b) ease of programming? :)

Post

Syncopator wrote:
BBFG# wrote:
Syncopator wrote:I don't know the protocol here, but if it's possible for the moderators to remove this unnecessary and distracting detour from the actual topic, that would be awesome. All I wanted to do was talk about guitar libraries. :)
Or you could just start a new thread in the Sampler (etc.) sub-forum and lock this one.
No need to depend on the moderators. JDIY! :)
I don't believe it's possible to (nor would I want to) lock a thread that I didn't start. :)
I see that now. However, since you are the one that decided to dredge this one up from last year, it still would be in your best interest to simply start a new one in the appropriate forum and let this one simply fade away (at least until someone else dredges it up as something current).

Post

Syncopator wrote:
lingyai wrote:
lingyai wrote:
Syncopator wrote:
lingyai wrote:As all of the instruments here are sample libraries, shouldn't this be in the sample library sub-forum?

Of not, can someone please explain how the categories work here?
The forum descriptions state:

Instruments: VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Instruments discussion
Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries: Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)

Since these are Kontakt libraries and since Kontakt is both a virtual instrument and a sampler, this discussion technically fits within either category. Does it really matter?

Back on topic: Would love to hear anyone's new thoughts on these guitar libraries!
No need to be so dismissive , it's not an objection to a mere technicality. It does matter actually in that, because 99% of Kontakt library discussions here take place in the sampling forum, that is where people would expect to look for them. (If you'd like to read people's opinions about these over the past year, you will find them there. Tr
Anyways, it's not all about you, who's already found this thread. It's a find-ability thing for ... you know... other people. Remember them?
Wow.

I took the time to post the forum descriptions and to give a plausible explanation for the inclusion of this question in this forum! Yet, you're now accusing me of thinking it's "all about me."

No good deed goes unpunished, right?

And regarding the "find-ability thing," you seem to be implying that I have special "finding powers" that no one else has, which I assure you is not the case. I simply did a search for "guitar libraries" and found this thread.

What prevents other people — whom I clearly do remember, as they're the ones for whom I previously cited the descriptions of the two forums — from searching for and finding this thread? I found the thread. You found the thread!

So, again, since the thread is findable, and since it can quite easily be shown to belong in either forum, I asked, "Does it really matter?" Because there's a little feature called search that allows you to find pretty much anything. You might try it sometime. (Oh, that's right! You already did!) Then you created a problem that didn't exist by complaining about the location of the thread — a thread that I didn't create, but for which I searched — and found — just. like. you. :)
I bet you make new friends everywhere you go.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK

Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood

Post

Syncopator wrote:I don't know the protocol here)
I can see that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK

Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood

Post

BBFG# wrote:
Syncopator wrote:
BBFG# wrote:
Syncopator wrote:I don't know the protocol here, but if it's possible for the moderators to remove this unnecessary and distracting detour from the actual topic, that would be awesome. All I wanted to do was talk about guitar libraries. :)
Or you could just start a new thread in the Sampler (etc.) sub-forum and lock this one.
No need to depend on the moderators. JDIY! :)
I don't believe it's possible to (nor would I want to) lock a thread that I didn't start. :)
I see that now. However, since you are the one that decided to dredge this one up from last year, it still would be in your best interest to simply start a new one in the appropriate forum and let this one simply fade away (at least until someone else dredges it up as something current).
No, it would NOT be in my "best interest" to start a new thread, since my very reason for posting in this thread was to see if the very guys who'd posted here last year had, in the time since then, upgraded their instruments and formed any new opinions!

That's why it's called a thread — because it allows us to have conversations with continuity. It's decidedly NOT in my best interest to start a new thread — in another sub-forum, no less — and then hope that the guys who commented here just happen to find that new thread in another location!

I'd respectfully ask you to decide what's in your best interest, and let me decide what's in mine.

Why is everyone here so angry and confrontational? I found this thread on guitar libraries very helpful, and I simply wanted to see if any of these guys had updated to the latest versions (e.g. RealGuitar 4) and if doing so had altered the opinions they'd shared, last year. (Of course new people would be welcome to chime in, as well.)

But instead of helpful replies, first I get yelled at by someone who doesn't think this thread (which I didn't start) is in the correct sub-forum, and now I'm being criticized for "dredging up" a previous thread, as if that were some sort of crime.

Holy frick, guys! No life much?

Post

You're the one that's keeping this game in play. :wink:
I responded to your original query in your other thread you posted in the Sampler subforum.
:tu:

Post

BBFG# wrote:You're the one that's keeping this game in play. :wink:
I responded to your original query in your other thread you posted in the Sampler subforum.
:tu:
:clap:


And they all lived happily ever after :hug:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK

Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood

Post

BBFG# wrote:You're the one that's keeping this game in play. :wink:
I don't understand the purpose of that comment. You guys are throwing darts unnecessarily, and I'm simply replying and defending my position. Then, because I reply, you're stating the obvious by saying I'm "keeping this game in play." I'm simply replying to the accusations, none of which has been helpful frankly.
BBFG# wrote:I responded to your original query in your other thread you posted in the Sampler subforum.
:tu:
Yes. Since no one here is being helpful, I created a new thread. The purpose of replying here was specifically to hear from the guys who had posted here before. But since that's getting nowhere, I created a new thread there. Perhaps there'll be some helpful and relevant replies there.

Say whatever you like after this. Seriously. I'm done participating in this petty exchange.

Post

Syncopator wrote: Say whatever you like after this. Seriously. I'm done participating in this petty exchange.
Translation:

"Having now helped perpetuate this tangent through my own long and needlessly provocative posts, and then been called out on it, I'm suddenly above this all now, and so will have the last word."

You will find that while many threads veer off-topic here, there are many folks on KVR who are willing to help if you don't behave like an arse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDj_Van ... uNbgY-4qFK

Circumcision's just another way of saying 'bye to the 'hood

Post

Most efficient use of time would be to go to youtube and also devs websites and watch as many tutorials and reviews on each instrument you want to know about and compare them yourself? Why take the opinion of someone you do not know to base your buying decisions?

Post Reply

Return to “Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries”