NEW Studio One v3 updates incoming.

[musiclover55547]

Feels the same about what, that that feature isn't revolutionary ? As in already possible with a VST SKnote Strip, or that it wasn't worthy of the hype ?

The former. Does it ever occur to you that someone might feel differently from you about that? Tht someone might feel it's a really clever approach, the design of MixFX. It's ok to disagree. It's just a word for god's sake.

It is a little odd to see adults go on about marketing words for 25 pages, as if they've never seen marketing hype before.

LOL I spend more time on other boards & view this forum (in general, not just S1,) through a different lense.

As of late, when I sign on to this site, I pretend I'm back in high school as a sophomore, not an adult spewing sophomoric comments. However, perhaps the user community is far younger here; this thread certainly supports that conclusion.

[nIGhT-SoN]

Feels the same about what, that that feature isn't revolutionary ? As in already possible with a VST SKnote Strip, or that it wasn't worthy of the hype ?

Is SKnote Strip free?

... somebody else thinks it's "revolutionary"....

The revolutionary part for me is how it's implemented, not the actual effect. You won't have to put that plugin on every channel, you just have to do it on a bus and this way you use less CPU. And the best part is that's acting like it's on every channel that goes in that bus.

[LawrenceF]

I hear you Bungle, not a big deal. My comments were more , to paraphrase my larger thinking...

"The Presonus marketing hype machine has permanent batteries for sure, it almost never turns off. I often do chuckle at some of the things they do, have a laugh, and move on. Otoh, some others seem to have a vendetta against them (the marketeers there, not the developers) as if the marketeers kidnapped and raped their sister or something. "

In other words, it's never that important (or shouldn't be), marketing words or phrases. I never thought Cadillac was "The Standard of the World" either, so I don't dwell on that either.

[LawrenceF]

The revolutionary part for me is how it's implemented, not the actual effect. .

I think it's "extremely clever" for sure, the design, but I wouldn't call it revolutionary personally, mmv as usual. But then again, if everyone was the same or thought the exact same way, life would be pretty boring.

I never take those things so literally. It's just marketing.

[Shalotta]

Not sure if a dedicated v3.2 bug thread is more appropriate, I`ll place it here for now.

Can this be confirmed or solved (and can some post the solution to this user):

[VariKusBrainZ]

You know they are selling a commercial product ?

If it doesn't sell, they don't make money and the product gets shelved.
Advertising helps sell products.

Seriously, do you all live as communist hippies ???!

Either that or you're thick as shit for not understanding how products are sold

lol,,, Just note, this Update was and is free to Studio One 3 owners,,,
And yes, you have to buy it if you don't own it, lol,,,

Yes, I'm a customer.

My post was directed at the numpties complaining about the 'marketing campaign' and the free update that didn't meet their individual stringent requirements to create their shitty bedroom EDM

I have zero beef with Presonus

[nIGhT-SoN]

I think it's "extremely clever" for sure, the design, but I wouldn't call it revolutionary personally, mmv as usual. But then again, if everyone was the same or thought the exact same way, life would be pretty boring.

I never take those things so literally. It's just marketing.

True, revolutionary might be a strong word. What I see is a new path for improving mixers inside daws. There always has been that problem with summing inside a daw and on actual hardware. There is a quite a huge difference and what I see here is a probable solution for that.

[jasco]

Did they release the Studio One Remote for Windows tablets yet?

[LawrenceF]

True, revolutionary might be a strong word. What I see is a new path for improving mixers inside daws. There always has been that problem with summing inside a daw and on actual hardware. There is a quite a huge difference and what I see here is a probable solution for that.

I do think, for the most part, for people who like the product anyway, that's the more generic main attraction of it. Not so much that they always do something you've never seen before, but more that they really do seem to very often have new and clever approaches to things.

Some people call it "workflow" I guess, but if you stand back and look at the larger picture objectively, it's just a really big collection of lots of really clever approaches to some older things. They didn't invent groove quantize or freeze for example, but the approaches and layouts and designs are very clever and efficient.

That's kinda what they do best, imo, and what helps close the gap for users waiting for more advanced features. It keeps happening over and over, like with the Automation Transformer, which was a really clever design once you saw it. They're certainly playing catch up to Cubase and DP and others and will be for some time, but those guys are really clever developers design wise... imo, mmv as usual.

[LawrenceF]

Did they release the Studio One Remote for Windows tablets yet?

Yes. It should be in your user account to download.

[progtronic]

Not sure if a dedicated v3.2 bug thread is more appropriate, I`ll place it here for now.

Can this be confirmed or solved (and can some post the solution to this user):

I can confirm this issue.

At first I thought it was something to do with folder/instrument prioritization.. but the more I fiddled with it, the more random it seemed.

Ticking an extra set of outs in Superior Drummer, resulted in the entire instrument being yanked out of the folder and thrown to the top of the list (happened with two separate instances of SD).

So.. I have no idea if this is a bug, or some sort of new "feature".

[Funkybot's Evil Twin]

Not sure if a dedicated v3.2 bug thread is more appropriate, I`ll place it here for now.

Can this be confirmed or solved (and can some post the solution to this user):

I'd definitely file a formal bug report just in case they're unaware. Question: if you recreate the project from scratch in 3.2 (which I understand if you don't want to do), does it still happen? I wonder if it's limited to old projects opened in 3.2 or happens in new 3.2 projects. Either way though, it's a bug.

[bungle]

Weird, it is just a word, but when i type it, it offends you, even though it is just a word too, strange that hah

Wow man. I like how you tried to turn that around.

I only wonder why you care so much if somebody else thinks it's "revolutionary" or whatever... because you keep dwelling on it. That's all.

BTW, I personally don't think it is either. I only wonder why you care so much if anyone does and are still talking about "revolutionary" on page 25.

Not arguing. Just saying,... "Ok, it wasn't "revolutionary" (for some or most)", get over it already.

Why are you trying to imply that these 25 pages have happened post announcement and that i have been posting it every page, are you really that biased over Studio One that you have to make a mountain out of a mole hill ?
But hey i will stop if it annoys you that much, i hope you manage to get over whatever harm it caused you.

[LawrenceF]

No harm to me, I know more than a few people who (for perfectly logical reasons of their own) feel the app kinda sucks for them. Couldn't care less really... they aren't doing my work anyway so... why would I care. It's just software.

I just find some of the comments funny... like "other developers are probably snickering". KVR just takes everything to really nutty extremes sometimes and it's pretty entertaining to read, that's all.

And again, not arguing with you or anyone here so please don't take it that way, was just having a chuckle over the relative drama around stupid marketing words that anyone who wasn't born yesterday should mostly ignore.

Anyway, sorry man.

[bungle]

Ok so you want to carry it on, yes for them to claim (that word that annoys you) is probaly making some developers snigger, simply because of how they have brought it to the public.
Kind of funny that you have completely ignored that i said this was a good update, just pointing out the bad stuff really winds you up, even though you pretend it doesn't, now that makes me snicker, shall i repeat it just for fun, i think this is a good update, mix fx are nothing original, in fact they are just a way to get more money from customers, but this is a good update.