What is this chord called?
-
- KVRist
- 302 posts since 12 Feb, 2005 from Finland
Check the attached image.
What's this chord called?
I know that E G B D F# is E minor ninth right?
But what if I add in notes E G B D F# one octave higher like shown in the pic?
Is it double chord or something?
What's this chord called?
I know that E G B D F# is E minor ninth right?
But what if I add in notes E G B D F# one octave higher like shown in the pic?
Is it double chord or something?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRist
- 441 posts since 30 Apr, 2007
A chord symbol doesn't describe exactly how to perform the chord. You can make different choices about how to space the notes out and whether to double notes and still have the same chord name.
-
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 1 Dec, 2004
The octave of notes doesn't matter (except that if the bass of the chord changes, it becomes a different chord).
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Really?MadBrain wrote:The octave of notes doesn't matter (except that if the bass of the chord changes, it becomes a different chord).
So, if I move the bass one octave higher, the chord changes? It doesn't simply become inverted?
To the original OP: Does it matter how the chord is called? Do you like the sound? Use it. If not, don't. Who cares how is it called? As long as it's written, people will play it (assuming it's physically possible to play it).
Fernando (FMR)
-
someone called simon someone called simon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=185637
- KVRian
- 543 posts since 24 Jul, 2008 from a small city in a small country in the antipodes
Humans tend to name things, it helps communicate with others, even helps us remember things for our own benefit. It appears you have one yourself...fmr wrote: To the original OP: Does it matter how the chord is called? Do you like the sound? Use it. If not, don't. Who cares how is it called? As long as it's written, people will play it (assuming it's physically possible to play it).
-
- KVRer
- 7 posts since 2 Feb, 2016
To expand on this, this works with any of the extended chords (9th, 11th, 13th, etc). If it's "add9", "add13", etc, you simply add that one to the triad (triad being the 1, 3, and 5). However if it's just "9" or "13" etc (Em9, D13, etc) you add everything UP TO that note.peteman wrote:Cool, many thanks!Opax wrote:Em9. If you were to leave out the D, it would be Em add9.
So an Em9 has a 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, where an Emadd9 would have a 1, 3, 5, and 9 (no 7).
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 302 posts since 12 Feb, 2005 from Finland
Well yeah, because I try to explain it to another person.fmr wrote:MadBrain wrote:To the original OP: Does it matter how the chord is called? Do you like the sound? Use it. If not, don't. Who cares how is it called? As long as it's written, people will play it (assuming it's physically possible to play it).
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 302 posts since 12 Feb, 2005 from Finland
This!!someone called simon wrote:Humans tend to name things, it helps communicate with others, even helps us remember things for our own benefit. It appears you have one yourself...fmr wrote: To the original OP: Does it matter how the chord is called? Do you like the sound? Use it. If not, don't. Who cares how is it called? As long as it's written, people will play it (assuming it's physically possible to play it).
-
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 1 Dec, 2004
True inversions behave differently from root position chords in progressions. For instance: F/A, G7/F, C/E sounds much less final than F, G7, C.fmr wrote:Really?MadBrain wrote:The octave of notes doesn't matter (except that if the bass of the chord changes, it becomes a different chord).What music theory says that?
So, if I move the bass one octave higher, the chord changes? It doesn't simply become inverted?![]()
There are also some chords that do change into other chords when you change the bass though (not just inversions):
Example 1:
C E A B: Cmaj13
E A B C: Am add9/C
A B C E: Am add9
B C E A: Bsus b9
Example 2:
C E G A: C6
A C E G: Am7
Example 3:
C D E G: Cadd9
D E G C: D11
Example 4:
D F G C: Dm11
G C D F: G7sus4
Example 5:
D F Ab C: Dm7b5
F Ab C D: Fm6
Example 6:
Eb G A Db: Eb7#11
A C# D# G: A7#11 (enharmonic spelling of some notes)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
1. When you are using ennharmonic notes, it is no longer the same chord, since it has other notes (no matter if the sound is the same, the chord is not the same, because what matters is what's written, since that will make a difference in what follows - in written music, you don't use enharmonic notes just because you can, but because the new written notes serve a purpose, for example for changing tonality).MadBrain wrote:True inversions behave differently from root position chords in progressions. For instance: F/A, G7/F, C/E sounds much less final than F, G7, C.fmr wrote:Really?MadBrain wrote:The octave of notes doesn't matter (except that if the bass of the chord changes, it becomes a different chord).What music theory says that?
So, if I move the bass one octave higher, the chord changes? It doesn't simply become inverted?![]()
There are also some chords that do change into other chords when you change the bass though (not just inversions):
Example 1:
C E A B: Cmaj13
E A B C: Am add9/C
A B C E: Am add9
B C E A: Bsus b9
Example 2:
C E G A: C6
A C E G: Am7
Example 3:
C D E G: Cadd9
D E G C: D11
Example 4:
D F G C: Dm11
G C D F: G7sus4
Example 5:
D F Ab C: Dm7b5
F Ab C D: Fm6
Example 6:
Eb G A Db: Eb7#11
A C# D# G: A7#11 (enharmonic spelling of some notes)
2. A chord inverted doesn't sound the same... True. But it is also true that a chord in the same position (meaning - with the same bass, because that's the only element that determines which position the chord is) don't sound the same, depending on which notes you double, which octaves you play them, etc. That doesn't mean the chord is not the same... it is, just the way it is written/played differ... therefore, also the sound differs.
3. You may give me 1.000 more examples. I can even give some to you. That doesn't change what i said. A chord is named after its fundamental position. If you then change the bass note of the chord you have an inversion of that same chord
Last edited by fmr on Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
THIS is for people who don't know music. Those that know music read the notes, and that's enough for them. A chord with E, G, B, D, F, A... whatever, is what it is. Naming it isolated, without a context, is not possible (at least for me, and I know something on the subject). You need to know where it comes from and where it goes to, because there are notes there that may simply not belong to the chord (and probably, there are). I prefer to read the entire text instead of memorizing isolated words. It's better and gives me a better picture (and avoids mistakes, too).peteman wrote:This!!someone called simon wrote:Humans tend to name things, it helps communicate with others, even helps us remember things for our own benefit. It appears you have one yourself...fmr wrote: To the original OP: Does it matter how the chord is called? Do you like the sound? Use it. If not, don't. Who cares how is it called? As long as it's written, people will play it (assuming it's physically possible to play it).
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 1 Dec, 2004
Okay but the example I gave was Eb7#11 vs A7#11 - a tritonic substitution - and tritonic substitions only make sense if you allow for enharmonic notes.fmr wrote: 1. When you are using ennharmonic notes, it is no longer the same chord, since it has other notes (no matter if the sound is the same, the chord is not the same, because what matters is what's written, since that will make a difference in what follows - in written music, you don't use enharmonic notes just because you can, but because the new written notes serve a purpose, for example for changing tonality).
Fine, inversions are on an intermediary level of difference between "different voicing of the same chord but with the same bass" and "different chord". Can you at least agree with this?fmr wrote: 2. A chord inverted doesn't sound the same... True. But it is also true that a chord in the same position (meaning - with the same bass, because that's the only element that determines which position the chord is) don't sound the same, depending on which notes you double, which octaves you play them, etc. That doesn't mean the chord is not the same... it is, just the way it is written/played differ... therefore, also the sound differs.
THAT'S A TAUTOLOGY!fmr wrote: 3. You may give me 1.000 more examples. I can even give some to you. That doesn't change what i said. A chord is named after its fundamental position. If you then change the bass note of the chord you have an inversion of that same chord