KVR Audio

thetechnobear · Post by **thetechnobear** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:42 pm

otristan wrote:
thetechnobear wrote: BTW: Tristan, can you add a linear curve for gain (I've added to my own copy), for many controllers they will already be adding a curve, so they don't really need any alteration to the gain level.
Done. There is a new Linear option in Gain Map.
Which controller do that ?

many thanks

both the eigenharp and madrona labs soundplane allow you to define a curve for pressure.
and Id have thought the continuum will allow it too, through the eagan matrix.

Cinebient · Post by **Cinebient** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:58 pm

thetechnobear wrote:
otristan wrote:
thetechnobear wrote: BTW: Tristan, can you add a linear curve for gain (I've added to my own copy), for many controllers they will already be adding a curve, so they don't really need any alteration to the gain level.
Done. There is a new Linear option in Gain Map.
Which controller do that ?
many thanks

both the eigenharp and madrona labs soundplane allow you to define a curve for pressure.
and Id have thought the continuum will allow it too, through the eagan matrix.

The Seaboard too.

Sampleconstruct · Post by **Sampleconstruct** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:15 pm

Something smooth, layering two pads using analog oscillators, an FM pad/lead and a granular vocal scape, some Macro automation and a limiter on the output:

https://soundcloud.com/sampleconstruct/ ... con-sounds

Echoes in the Attic · Post by **Echoes in the Attic** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:36 pm

aMUSEd wrote:I was very disappointed in my QuNexus. tbh I think the way it's designed (particularly in terms of materials) just doesn't make sense for what it's supposed to do.

Me too, I returned my first one because the pitch bend just wouldn't work. Confirmed by KM. My replacement arrived with the exact same issue. Returned that too. Nice folks there but the pads were a bit unpredictable in terms of responsiveness. Looking for an xkey instead for mobile polyAT. Plus I use the touch screen Bitwig keyboard for the glidey stuff. I'd love to see a more compact linnstrument. Maybe half the length and a little thinner.

otristan · Post by **otristan** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:50 am

Regarding MPE, the script has been updated in 1.1.
It now supports relative Y and Z axis with -1..1 range where 0 is the initial triggering value.
Quite useful for timbre where you can add or subtract while moving your finger up/down.
Plus it plays as is even if you play high or low on the key.

otristan · Post by **otristan** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:11 pm

Version 1.1.1 is online

- fix EffectRack custom background display when used in Layer/Keygroup level
- fix regression introduced in 1.1 in IRCAM stretch with non looped samples
- fix IRCAM stretch issue with very large stretching in some cases
- support for vst-xml DnD
- add "Song" Trigger Mode in LFO (synced with host song position)
- fix regression regarding markers missing reset when changing samples in an oscillator
- fix song trigger mode in arpeggiator
- better Chord mode behavior in Arpeggiator

Enjoy !

ErikH · Post by **ErikH** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:33 pm

Thanks Olivier and the entire team!

Download complete, and ready to go falcon-hunting some orc!

ErikH · Post by **ErikH** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:16 pm

Mi again.

It seems that the Ircam guys now have forced the audio settings to 64, 128, 256 etc so my weird card does not get its own settings anymore (144, 288,...).
No big deal as I do realise it's time to ditch the Edirol UA-25EX and get a more recent card.

Apart from that, at first hearing the issues seem to be gone.

SJ_Digriz · Post by **SJ_Digriz** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:20 pm

ErikH wrote:Mi again.

It seems that the Ircam guys now have forced the audio settings to 64, 128, 256 etc so my weird card does not get its own settings anymore (144, 288,...).
No big deal as I do realise it's time to ditch the Edirol UA-25EX and get a more recent card.

Apart from that, at first hearing the issues seem to be gone.

I'm on the road so can't test.. But my interface doesn't support those buffer settings. How does it force it?

ErikH · Post by **ErikH** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:30 pm

In short: in standalone mode it does not.
But in Cubase it does because it's Cubase (the daw) that decides upon the audio settings.

The result is that I can now set all settings inside Ircam Stretch and Scub to zero, or any value I fancy and the CPU usage in Falcon does not exceed 12% and I have no cracles or dropouts anymore, and this at 288.

It seems to be fixed...

Sound Author · Post by **Sound Author** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:33 pm

Is there no way to edit tunings in the Micro Tuner from withing Falcon? So far, it looks like you have to use Scala software.

otristan · Post by **otristan** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:43 pm

@ErikH

Please download Falcon back.
Looks like a test have made its way to the release build.

My bad.

otristan · Post by **otristan** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:45 pm

Sound Author wrote:Is there no way to edit tunings in the Micro Tuner from withing Falcon? So far, it looks like you have to use Scala software.

Nop. It's Scala based only.
Ediingt 127 pitch would be just a nightmare unless you plan to do something simple and
in that case you probably shouldn't be using the MicroTuner but probably a Key > Pitch modulation with a custom mapper.

Sound Author · Post by **Sound Author** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:49 pm

otristan wrote:
Sound Author wrote:Is there no way to edit tunings in the Micro Tuner from withing Falcon? So far, it looks like you have to use Scala software.
Nop. It's Scala based only.
Ediingt 127 pitch would be just a nightmare unless you plan to do something simple and
in that case you probably shouldn't be using the MicroTuner but probably a Key > Pitch modulation with a custom mapper.

Just asking for review purposes. I'm probably never going to use the Micro Tuner, but who knows? Maybe I'll acquire a taste for micro tunings.

otristan · Post by **otristan** » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:53 pm

I see

UVI Falcon - v4 = 2026 released - rumors, ads, praise, kindergarden, auto-sampling and off-topic inside!