KVR Audio

Bio~Rhythm · Post by **Bio~Rhythm** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 3:06 am

Scientific innovation shows no sign of slowing down (quite the opposite is true). So where will science take electronic music?.

How about atomically timed synthesis or atomically timed music production in general. Will quantum computing change the sounds produced in the future ?. Or what about artificial intelligence combined with a human producer?.

The potential could be endless

. Environmental stability aside.

Tet-64 · Post by **Tet-64** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 3:16 am

I think VR is next on the horizon maybe with virtual drum kits, virtual consoles , lessons etc

No doubt the likes of sugar bytes will probably make some wonderfully interactive sound generation

masterhiggins · Post by **masterhiggins** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 3:34 am

I think science will allow even more people with absolutely no musical ability, intuition, or intelligence to make music.

deastman · Post by **deastman** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:00 am

Science and technological invention are not the same thing.

chaosWyrM · Post by **chaosWyrM** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:34 am

Aleatoriac · Post by **Aleatoriac** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:41 am

masterhiggins wrote:I think science will allow even more people with absolutely no musical ability, intuition, or intelligence to make music.

Isn't that already pretty much at a saturation point?
I offer my own... "music" as exhibit A.

There's not a sex smiley.

This site f**king sucks.

foosnark · Post by **foosnark** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:56 pm

I think a much more important question is where musicians will take electronic music.

DJ Warmonger · Post by **DJ Warmonger** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:19 pm

masterhiggins wrote:I think science will allow even more people with absolutely no musical ability, intuition, or intelligence to make music.

It already happens. But i doesn't help them make any good music

Kalamata Kid · Post by **Kalamata Kid** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:22 pm

When Pianoteq 9 is released in 2023 it will simulate the perfect piano.
Beyond version 9 the piano will produce perfect otherworldly piano-like
music.

I love science and technology especially when it related to music.
So I am looking forward to the future.

Bio~Rhythm · Post by **Bio~Rhythm** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:08 pm

Tet-64 wrote:I think VR is next on the horizon maybe with virtual drum kits, virtual consoles , lessons etc

No doubt the likes of sugar bytes will probably make some wonderfully interactive sound generation

Virtual reality could be amazing for the fun factor of actually playing music. And could lead to a evolution (as in something that has not been before, not to be confused with Darwinian evolution. i.e - natural selection ) in the way music is played and made.

As you say virtual instruments like percussion could work well if used in conjunction with a controller that gave responsive and tactile feed back. I like the idea of actually producing electronic music such as house whilst dancing. Feet are the drums ,cymbals (clicks etc) the fingers etc etc. Body parts that actually trigger a specific synthetic sound when moved.

V0RT3X · Post by **V0RT3X** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:10 pm

Algorithmic EDM generator apps for your iphone that even upload to Soundcloud.

Gymnopedies · Post by **Gymnopedies** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:51 pm

Away....Hopefully. At least for the most part.

Bio~Rhythm · Post by **Bio~Rhythm** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:56 pm

masterhiggins wrote:I think science will allow even more people with absolutely no musical ability, intuition, or intelligence to make music.

So science and technology (the appliance of science) has the potential to increase knowledge only if the end user choosers/decides/works out etc, that gaining knowledge or learning new things is worthwhile to them. And those that don't miss out but may never realise just because they have missed the opportunity to improve their thinking power.e.g- spending too much time watching or listening to stuff that never challengers the user to question stuff. I'd argue if you have a thought system that must always believe in any certain specific thing then this could be a self imposed limit on what you allow yourself to think.

I apologise as I digress from the threads central topic. But as masterhiggins suggested, science and the technology that may (or may not) be developed from that knowledge can be/is used by some people whom understand very little about the technology.Further more some actively try to discredit science as a "bad thing". Which of course is nonsense, as the scientific method is a proven system/method that gathers reliable data/information (using statistics to prove or disprove the hypothesis).

How that information is then used is about the behaviour of the end users and the ethics of the society’s they live in.

Bio~Rhythm · Post by **Bio~Rhythm** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:11 pm

foosnark wrote:I think a much more important question is where musicians will take electronic music.

where? don't you mean how people will use the new tech to make interesting new structures of music. The where will be in the only place humans can perceive the music (the brain). Though if your wanting to make philosophical and or spiritual music you could try making a instrument that doesn’t require physics.

Best of luck with that one

.

fabianlobrij · Post by **fabianlobrij** » Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:43 pm

I say we go back to the future... with ambisonics

therefore we should breakup the out-of-phase relationship with stereo.

stereo brought us The Holy Crosstalk? More like junkie talk with a fresh fix of analog dither in the brain... Sweetshaping it all we want but in the end we all null into silence, yes, its true but the given extra headroom wont saturate as phat as thought. Only the Higher Order Lords of Spacial Harmonics can save us now... lets show them our spectral magnitude with pray'n'delay