KVR Audio

core · Post by **core** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:35 pm

KnickersDown wrote:
aoao123 wrote:most people voted for their favourite filter, *not* the most realistic one.
Most realistic one = favourite one. Same thing.

Not for me. My favorite is still #4, but I like #1 quite a lot for certain settings as well. I won't vote because I'd pcik my favorite and not the one that behaves most analogue (cause I wouldn't know which one that'd be really)

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:31 am

Looks like we've only had one vote in the last 24 hours or so (it was 275 last night and 276 now). Makes sense, it's been two full weeks. Here's to hoping we hear from Urs soon, I'm very interested in reading his take on the results. I also find it very interesting how different the results are between here and Gearslutz. Granted there's far fewer votes on GS, but Filter 1 has 1 vote there, in last place, and it's in second place here.

mauricio javier · Post by **mauricio javier** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:41 am

this version does not expire when leaving the commercial version? thanks you u - he . the best instruments vst

PAK · Post by **PAK** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:18 am

BR393 wrote:This turned out to be a much harder call than I expected. Since the poll question is "To your ears, which filter behaves most analogue", for me it's still a tie between 2 and 5. Those are the only two filters for which I can't detect anything that sounds like digital artifacts/aliasing either with my ears or a spectrum analyzer.

Yes. Maybe more of a case of "which sounds least digital".

I'd also pick 5. But, at (what sounds like) the cost of high frequencies and transients, it reminds me of older digital filters. I wouldn't want that, even if it's what I'd pick as the answer. For me, 3 makes the best compromise. It keeps most of what 5 gives you, without the same dulling of the sound.

So 4 if you want character and don't mind if it's a bit digital, 1 if you want even more than that, 5 if you want none of that, and 3 if you want most of what 5 gives you minus the muffle or whatever it is. 2 is stuck in the middle of 5 and 3.

Funniest result would be if unloved 2 was the most CPU expensive

e@rs · Post by **e@rs** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:14 am

Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:I also find it very interesting how different the results are between here and Gearslutz. Granted there's far fewer votes on GS, but Filter 1 has 1 vote there, in last place, and it's in second place here.

I wonder if Urs actually got something useful out of all this mess...

spunkmuffin · Post by **spunkmuffin** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:36 pm

e@rs wrote:I wonder if Urs actually got something useful out of all this mess...

Well I'm sure he got a laugh. And laughter relieves stress. So yes he sure did.

pepelogu · Post by **pepelogu** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:48 pm

Anyway, it sounds amazing already, whatever filter you choose. Can't wait for the final release, please don't hold on for it for to long Urs!

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:17 pm

We sure get a lot out of this!

I'm currently stressed out with a lot of other things, but I hope to write a conclusion within the next couple of days.

StarskyCarr · Post by **StarskyCarr** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:23 pm

Still filter 4 for me. I just like it more! - as I mentioned after my first listen I can hear some artefacts in there, but it seems to capture the essence of the synth more than the others.

We're possibly talking diminishing returns here though. 2,3 and 5 are all decent sounding, and it wouldn't put me off purchasing the final product. These all sound perfectly useable in the mix - and in solo if not pushing too hard.

mkastrup · Post by **mkastrup** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:35 pm

I voted #2,

#3 were similar to 2 but i went for #2, the others bleed too much.

By bleed i mean the raw osc is audible at closed filter settings and the filter dont seem to put a blanket fully over the raw osc.

spunkmuffin · Post by **spunkmuffin** » Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:57 pm

Just like to say I love this thing. Love all the filters, even 2. I actually find myself using 2 the most!

You must develop & include 3 even though it is coming 3rd in the poll.

I epecially love the triangle wave. Whoever worked on it you are awesome.

Would like a third oscillator with the triangle wave.

Also maybe seperate filters for each oscillator? I don't know but this could be interesting.

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Wed Apr 20, 2016 12:25 am

spunkmuffin wrote:Just like to say I love this thing. Love all the filters, even 2. I actually find myself using 2 the most!

You must develop & include 3 even though it is coming 3rd in the poll.

I epecially love the triangle wave. Whoever worked on it you are awesome.

Would like a third oscillator with the triangle wave.

Also maybe seperate filters for each oscillator? I don't know but this could be interesting.

It is only going to have the features of an actual Pro One... plus the obvious things like presets, midi

SPSone · Post by **SPSone** » Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:01 am

Filter 4 seems to have something different about it! Not sure what

For me though in terms of which to my hearing behaved "Most Analog" would have to vote 3 followed closely by 5.

Wasn't overly keen on 1 & 2

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:17 am

One thing I've noticed, and that RePro has brought new members and old members with very few posts back to KVR! It sure has some magic

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Apr 20, 2016 12:53 pm

EnGee wrote:One thing I've noticed, and that RePro has brought new members and old members with very few posts back to KVR! It sure has some magic

Yeah, noticed that too!

Repro-1 (out now)

To your ears, which filter behaves most analogue