KVR Audio

Uncle E · Post by **Uncle E** » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:08 pm

ATN69 wrote:U-he

I would love this, too, but then it would mean they wouldn't have time to develop plugins.

Kalamata Kid · Post by **Kalamata Kid** » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:45 pm

LawrenceF wrote:
AnX wrote:Is there a market for a new host? We already have cubarse, pro tools, live, etc... none of those are perfect. Why would a new one be any different?
Yes, imo. Daw users, music hobbyists, every other related category surrounding that thing that buys these things are arguably among the most transient segment out there, always searching for the next new or cool thing.

See Studio One where people asked that same question 6-7 years ago. Then Bitwig, when Live already existed.

If you build it somebody will always come.

I thoght the same thing when Studio One was introduced. How stupid is it for Presonus to make DAW with so many good DAW's already being available. Apparently if you make something better people will buy it. I did!

Gymnopedies · Post by **Gymnopedies** » Tue Apr 26, 2016 8:59 pm

Alabama- with a Banjo on it's Knee.

incubus · Post by **incubus** » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:07 pm

cryophonik wrote:
rod_zero wrote:Fabfilter for sure, the DAW GUI needs a revolution and they could do it. I love Live GUI but would also love to see what the talented guys of Fabfilter could do for a DAW.
What if the Ableton guys would just let the FabFilter guys redesign Live's GUI?

Well, it would look the same!

zenophilix · Post by **zenophilix** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:24 am

Robert Randolph wrote:Be nice if Apple made a fully-fledged DAW.

http://www.apple.com/logic-pro/

fedexnman · Post by **fedexnman** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:41 am

Microsoft

Unfocused · Post by **Unfocused** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:51 am

+1 for NI.

Also, how about Celemony? Melodyne 4 Studio is closing the gap already. If they added a good MIDI editor and VST hosting, automation, etc. Imagine multiple MIDI controllable audio tracks!

-u

goldenanalog · Post by **goldenanalog** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:26 am

Unfocused wrote:+1 for NI.

Also, how about Celemony? Melodyne 4 Studio is closing the gap already. If they added a good MIDI editor and VST hosting, automation, etc. Imagine multiple MIDI controllable audio tracks!

-u

+1 for NI, as well as for a CM4S DAW derivitive - a full Celemony DAW might be big $$$, tho -

Korg's Gadget is probably up next for audio track integration (3.0) - I personally think that it would be really cool to see Korg and Auria's Wavemachine Labs working together on the next version of Gadget - including further evolving integration between Gadget & Ableton Live -

Silaris · Post by **Silaris** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:54 am

Softube or Fxpansion.

kokotte · Post by **kokotte** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 3:39 am

UVI, FF, Melda, Xfer.

Kalamata Kid · Post by **Kalamata Kid** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:23 am

Since we are going down this path I want to add the developer that
made Nora to the A list. He is fast and communicates very well!
https://squaredheads.com/program.php

goldenanalog · Post by **goldenanalog** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:36 am

Kalamata Kid wrote:Since we are going down this path I want to add the developer that
made Nora to the A list. He is fast and communicates very well!
https://squaredheads.com/program.php

Wow! I'm going to take a look at this - Thanks, Kalamata Kid!

tooneba · Post by **tooneba** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:15 am

Robert Randolph wrote:Be nice if Apple made a fully-fledged DAW.

Your project will be destroyed by newest version.

SpaceTraffic · Post by **SpaceTraffic** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 11:22 am

i think that a successful DAW must be innovative to really catch it - thinking outside the DAW!

team renoise!

SpaceTraffic · Post by **SpaceTraffic** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 11:23 am

btw, i find the -do we need more daws- attitude scary... do we need more intsruments? do we need more synths?

H E C K Y E A H !

I would love to see a fully fledge DAW from...